There are two problems here. One is that the meaning is not being taken as per the Quran itself. It is being limited to the present day understanding of the word. Moreover, even the work aakher did not have the meaning of last, in some cases. There is a hadith where the Prophet (saw) said: inni aakherul anbiyaa wa innahu akherul masaajid.
That is why it is so important to understand the Quran.
If khataam means last, even with a fathah on the taa', then it would contradict this verse of the Quran:
That is why it is so important to understand the Quran.
If khataam means last, even with a fathah on the taa', then it would contradict this verse of the Quran:
يَا بَنِي آدَمَ إِمَّا يَأْتِيَنَّكُمْ رُسُلٌ مِّنكُمْ يَقُصُّونَ عَلَيْكُمْ آيَاتِي فَمَنِ اتَّقَى وَأَصْلَحَ فَلاَ خَوْفٌ عَلَيْهِمْ وَلاَ هُمْ يَحْزَنُونَ
It is very clear that this verse is all in the mudhaari'. According to this Muslims should always be waiting for messengers.
Again, I am pleading that you should have fear of Allah and stick to the first translations you did of the word khaatam and khaatim.
Also, you should understand that because the Law of Muhammad (saw) is the best law, that naturally means that no more laws will come after Quran. This is a logical conclusion from the expression used. But the expression by itself does not mean 'last prophet." It means 'seal of the prophets.'
Again, I am pleading that you should have fear of Allah and stick to the first translations you did of the word khaatam and khaatim.
Also, you should understand that because the Law of Muhammad (saw) is the best law, that naturally means that no more laws will come after Quran. This is a logical conclusion from the expression used. But the expression by itself does not mean 'last prophet." It means 'seal of the prophets.'



and don't belive about qadiani (astghferallah )

Comment