Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Secularism on State Level?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Secularism on State Level?

    I still dont understand why most muslims reject secularism on state level, even though clearly we have evidence that this is the best system overall, with very few faults. Look at Canada as the best of example. Heck even in the muslim world places like secular (Dubai) are considered way better to live

  • #2
    Originally posted by Karachi View Post
    I still dont understand why most muslims reject secularism on state level, even though clearly we have evidence that this is the best system overall, with very few faults. Look at Canada as the best of example. Heck even in the muslim world places like secular (Dubai) are considered way better to live
    This is how every BS post starts.
    Originally posted by Firdousi
    Never talk with Afghans about politics. All their political knowledge is limited to conspiracy theories, political demonization and contradictions. No logic, no reason.

    Comment


    • #3
      ^ Canada is best evidence, what more can I say. Having lived in two prominent muslim countries Saudi Arabia (14) years, Pakistan (1) year and then a secular country like Canada for 14-15 years, I can say 100% then this is a way better system based on humanity and not religious intolerance. Would people want to live in Taliban, ISIS, Saudi etc.. States or Canada? Thats why Sharia will most likely never see any major support, unless until it is refined to modern times

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Karachi View Post
        ^ Canada is best evidence, what more can I say. Having lived in two prominent muslim countries Saudi Arabia (14) years, Pakistan (1) year and then a secular country like Canada for 14-15 years, I can say 100% then this is a way better system based on humanity and not religious intolerance. Would people want to live in Taliban, ISIS, Saudi etc.. States or Canada? Thats why Sharia will most likely never see any major support, unless until it is refined to modern times
        Shameless Khurasani himself is not living in Saudi or ISIS' "Caliphate" or the Taliban "Emirate" but in.....*SHOCK*....liberal western Holland!

        lol





        Shameless Khurasani =

        * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

        Shukran ya Masr!!!

        Thanks to Egypt for supporting Bangladesh against Pakistani harassment and support for terrorists and war criminals!!

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Karachi View Post
          ^ Canada is best evidence, what more can I say. Having lived in two prominent muslim countries Saudi Arabia (14) years, Pakistan (1) year and then a secular country like Canada for 14-15 years, I can say 100% then this is a way better system based on humanity and not religious intolerance. Would people want to live in Taliban, ISIS, Saudi etc.. States or Canada? Thats why Sharia will most likely never see any major support, unless until it is refined to modern times
          Its hard to reach deaf and blind people. Secularism is just letting people do their own thing, they still can be hardcore muslim if they like, but there should be no pressure on other to act the same way. I don't understand why are people so against this.

          Comment


          • #6
            The only acceptable system is Anarchy, not secular democracy or anything else.

            Zindabad Anarchy where everyone is free.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Khostai View Post
              Its hard to reach deaf and blind people. Secularism is just letting people do their own thing, they still can be hardcore muslim if they like, but there should be no pressure on other to act the same way. I don't understand why are people so against this.
              The ******* mullahs are in the way, that is the problem, jahil muslim public is brainwashed by them to think anything secular is evil, the mullahs are the biggest evil, look what just happend in pakistan, where a mullah forced a boy to cut off his hand because of so called blasphemy. This is why I personnally think Tajikistan and central asian countries are doing the right thing by getting rid of mullahs, even though I agree force is not a good thing, but something needs to be done to fight these ugly mullahs

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Karachi View Post
                The ******* mullahs are in the way, that is the problem, jahil muslim public is brainwashed by them to think anything secular is evil, the mullahs are the biggest evil, look what just happend in pakistan, where a mullah forced a boy to cut off his hand because of so called blasphemy. This is why I personnally think Tajikistan and central asian countries are doing the right thing by getting rid of mullahs, even though I agree force is not a good thing, but something needs to be done to fight these ugly mullahs
                I think the problem with muslims is that the two richest and important Islamic countries are hardcore extremist. you have Saudi Arabia on one hand and Iran on the other, both have big influence on sunni and shia people. But they just produce extremism, altough Saudis have mastered the spreading of extremism much better than Iran. I think big change in those extreme mullah will only come when this two countries change.

                Comment

                Working...
                X