د لمانځه طریقه او ژباړنه| pashto translation of salah prayer

[شمله ور خراساني]

لسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته| As salaamu aleikoum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu,

I am working on a series of videos for educational purposes. This one is about the prayer (salah) translated into Pashto, plus an instruction of how to pray in accordance to the Sunnah of the prophet Muhammad saww.

This video is the introduction. The rest of the videos contain images of a person preforming the prayer and showing exactly how to pray.

As soon as I have finished the next parts of the video, I will post them here in this thread.

[شمله ور خراساني]

Sangar did you make this video yourself?

Yes. But the voice is not mine. Its Sheikh Ameenullah.

[Zarawar]

^ Sheikh Aminullah Al Kunari is one of the few Afghan scholars I listen to

[شمله ور خراساني]

^ Sheikh Aminullah Al Kunari is one of the few Afghan scholars I listen to

I love him.

on Quran aw Sunnat there are plenty of his lectures.

[شمله ور خراساني]

[Mujib]

Brothers and sisters, these talks do not teach prayer according to the proper method. The method of prayer described in these talks is not according to any of the four madhhabs. In Islam, we follow madhhabs for legal rulings. A madhhab facilitates the Shari`a for non-scholars.

For a guide to prayer according to the Hanafi madhhab, see The Complete Hanafi Prayer.

[Mujib]

As for the website itself, they preach false and incorrect information. They attack traditional Islam and Muslims (Ahl al-Sunna/Sunni), and they attempt to undo the very foundation of the din.

Wahhabism is an extremist sect that considers the majority of Muslims, scholars and laymen alike, to be outside the fold of Islam. Their "scholars" declare Muslims kafir, charging them with shirk and kufr, and the followers use these fatwas to fight and kill Muslims around the world. This extremist sect is funded by Saudi oil money. Young Muslims from around the world are recruited into their schools and universities, and after indoctrination, they are sent back to their homelands to spread Wahhabism/Salafism.

We must all be weary of this fitna that plagues the umma. Ahl al-Sunna/Sunni (traditional/orthodox/mainstream) Islam is represented by the four madhhabs - Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi`i, Hanbali - in jurisprudence (fiqh), by the two schools - Maturidi and Ash`ari - in beliefs (`aqida), and by the various orders (tariqas) of Tasawwuf/Sufism, the Islamic science of the purification of the heart.

Alhamdulillah, there are many great Afghan scholars whose bayans are available online. So there's no need to hear those newcombers who challenge and oppose the knowledge and piety of our great scholars.

[شمله ور خراساني]

Brothers and sisters, these talks do not teach prayer according to the proper method. The method of prayer described in these talks is not according to any of the four madhhabs. In Islam, we follow madhhabs for legal rulings. A madhhab facilitates the Shari`a for non-scholars.

For a guide to prayer according to the Hanafi madhhab, see The Complete Hanafi Prayer.

thank you for being so kind.

But the 4 schools are founded on quran and hadith. And Sheikh Ameenullah solely relies on Quran and hadith.

[شمله ور خراساني]

As for the website itself, they preach false and incorrect information. They attack traditional Islam and Muslims (Ahl al-Sunna/Sunni), and they attempt to undo the very foundation of the din.

Wahhabism is an extremist sect that considers the majority of Muslims, scholars and laymen alike, to be outside the fold of Islam. Their "scholars" declare Muslims kafir, charging them with shirk and kufr, and the followers use these fatwas to fight and kill Muslims around the world. This extremist sect is funded by Saudi oil money. Young Muslims from around the world are recruited into their schools and universities, and after indoctrination, they are sent back to their homelands to spread Wahhabism/Salafism.

We must all be weary of this fitna that plagues the umma. Ahl al-Sunna/Sunni (traditional/orthodox/mainstream) Islam is represented by the four madhhabs - Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi`i, Hanbali - in jurisprudence (fiqh), by the two schools - Maturidi and Ash`ari - in beliefs (`aqida), and by the various orders (tariqas) of Tasawwuf/Sufism, the Islamic science of the purification of the heart.

Alhamdulillah, there are many great Afghan scholars whose bayans are available online. So there's no need to hear those newcombers who challenge and oppose the knowledge and piety of our great scholars.

The website you are promoting, Sufipath declares everyone a kaafir. In fact they have declared ibn Taymiyyah as Kaafir.

Also, your Sufi website promotes Hindu Advaita concept ( wahdatul wujood).

[Mujib]

thank you for being so kind.

But the 4 schools are founded on quran and hadith. And Sheikh Ameenullah solely relies on Quran and hadith.

Deriving legal rulings from primary sources such as the Qur'an and Sunna is the job of mujtahid imams. The rulings of prayer have already been established by the four madhhabs. The greatest scholars of Islam have contributed to the formulation and growth of the four madhhabs. What need, then, is there for lesser scholars to attempt to undo 1000 years of scholarship and reform the Shari`a?

[شمله ور خراساني]

Deriving legal rulings from primary sources such as the Qur'an and Sunna is the job of mujtahid imams. The rulings of prayer have already been established by the four madhhabs. The greatest scholars of Islam have contributed to the formulation and growth of the four madhhabs. What need, then, is there for lesser scholars to attempt to undo 1000 years of scholarship and reform the Shari`a?

The 4 imams were human beings. Just like you and me. I know it is quite a difficult concept for you to understand. But allah has created all men as equals.

The 4 imams relied on quran and hadith. And not all ahadith were collected and organized and filthered when Imam Abu Haneefah was alive. This is why he said that anything from him that is in contradiction with quran and hadith should be rejected.

And the 4 imams were not mentioned in the quran. They were not prophets. So any human being who achieves the status of great scholar can preform ijtihad. We have had many great scholars through-out the history who have contributed to our way of life.

As long is a scholar is not an evil innovator, and his teachings are founded and based on quran and hadith, then there is nothing wrong about it.

You should stop worshiping your scholars. And you should stop being evil and stop issuing warnings.

You are being a hypocrite. While the kuffaar and the qadianis are flooding this website, you sit quitely and allow this to happen without ever responding to them.

But when something is shared that is inviting people to Quran and Hadith you quickly post your nasty comments.

Sheikh Ameenullah was quite right to describe the attitude of people like you as that of the Jews.

You oppose the truth and you want to prevent people from knwoing the sources of their religion. But you rather have people following the Sufis blindly.

This is why your evil sect is doomed. The dawah of Quran and Sunnah is prevalent all across the world. Even in Europa and north America, people flock to Quran and Sunnah. And despite the fact that Jews thinkthanks in America are promoting Sufism, you still fail to grow. You people will slowly vanish into oblivion. The more educated people become, the more distance they will seek from deviant Sufis and their evil practices.

[Mujib]

The website you are promoting, Sufipath declares everyone a kaafir. In fact they have declared ibn Taymiyyah as Kaafir.

Does a falsehood become truth just because someone says it is? Can you point to a single answer at SunniPath that declares another Muslim a kafir? Can you point to the answer that declares Ibn Taymiyya a kafir?

Also, your Sufi website promotes Hindu Advaita concept ( wahdatul wujood).

Were you not asking about Wahdat al-Wujud and Advaita just a few days ago? Have you now grasped both such that you can make these baseless claims?

The following answers concerning Hindu Monism and Pantheism should be enough to save you from making this assertion again:

Pantheism Contradicts Islamic Belief

Replies to Questions on Hinduism.

You are now obliged to correct yourself wherever you've made this and similar claims.

[Mujib]

The 4 imams were human beings. Just like you and me. I know it is quite a difficult concept for you to understand. But allah has created all men as equals.

May Allah make it easier for me to understand. It couldn't have been difficult for you to understand, brother, yet you posted Brother Ameenullah's talks. He is just a human being like Sangar and Mujib. And do you forget this concept when you go to school and sit before a professor, when you go to a doctor, when you go to the mechanic? The professor, doctor, and mechanic are all human beings just like Sangar and Mujib.

And the 4 imams were not mentioned in the quran. They were not prophets.

Neither is Brother Ameenullah. The choice, then, is between the great mujtahid imams of this umma who have contributed over 1000 years of scholarship to the madhhabs, and the likes of Brother Ameenullah.

You are being a hypocrite. While the kuffaar and the qadianis are flooding this website, you sit quitely and allow this to happen without ever responding to them.

Defending myself is not my goal here, and it is a waste of time. The truth is clear to those who have eyes.

[شمله ور خراساني]

Does a falsehood become truth just because someone says it is? Can you point to a single answer at SunniPath that declares another Muslim a kafir? Can you point to the answer that declares Ibn Taymiyya a kafir?



Were you not asking about Wahdat al-Wujud and Advaita just a few days ago? Have you now grasped both such that you can make these baseless claims?

The following answers concerning Hindu Monism and Pantheism should be enough to save you from making this assertion again:

Pantheism Contradicts Islamic Belief

Replies to Questions on Hinduism.

You are now obliged to correct yourself wherever you've made this and similar claims.

This is what your website is saying.

Orthodox Sunni belief teaches that Allah Most High does not resemble his creation in any way whatsoever, and hence neither location nor direction may be ascribed to Him. Allah's creation occupies space; Allah is transcendently beyond occupying space. It is hence incorrect to say that He is everywhere, just as it is incorrect to say that he is physically "in" any particular place.

As usual. they are lying. Because according to sahih hadith, the prophet saww asked the slave girl where is allah. Ans she pointed out to the sky. Affirming that he is above.

Also, according to sahih hadith, the prophet saww would raise his hands towards the sky in prayer.

And in qur'an, it says that arrahman is on his throne.


Sufipath is obviously in denial of these evidence. For the reason that they rather follow the opinion of scholars than to look into the books.

And yest, Wahdatul Wujood comes from hindu Advaita.

[شمله ور خراساني]

May Allah make it easier for me to understand. It couldn't have been difficult for you to understand, brother, yet you posted Brother Ameenullah's talks. He is just a human being like Sangar and Mujib. And do you forget this concept when you go to school and sit before a professor, when you go to a doctor, when you go to the mechanic? The professor, doctor, and mechanic are all human beings just like Sangar and Mujib.

Neither is Brother Ameenullah. The choice, then, is between the great mujtahid imams of this umma who have contributed over 1000 years of scholarship to the madhhabs, and the likes of Brother Ameenullah.

Defending myself is not my goal here, and it is a waste of time. The truth is clear to those who have eyes.

Well, Ameenullah is not inventing things. Neither is he doing any ijtihad. And never have I said that we should follow him blindly.

But you are a vicious Sufi who is scared of people like Ameenullah. Because he promotes Quran & Sunnah.

You are of the kind who would reject anything that contradicts Sufis. If there are piles of ahadith that contradict Sufis. why should we believe you when you claim that Sufism, graveworship and innovation by Sufi deviants is correct?