Dangers of Religion

[Khostai]

Sam Harris on the Dangers of Religion - YouTube

[Badlun]

Religion if remains limited to personal faith, personal worship and personal morality then it is never dangerous but if you make it political, social, economic, educational then it is an atomic rather hydrogen bomb as wee see it in the shape of Al Qaida, Taliban , sectarian killings today and Crusades and wars of Church in the past. Even the peaceful Buddhists in Srilanka are getting violent.

[khushal]

SAm harris has been debunked:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDNCwjbGOp4

[khushal]

Law of Equilibrium guys. If you have extremists on one side, then you will have on the other side as well. Robert Pape proves it and the fact that Sam Harris strategy has only increased the extemists reaction because he himself is an extremist employing an extremists strategy.

[SiiNii]

Religion-free Communism killed more people and caused more misery the last 100 years than any other ideology.

I'm an atheist and have never been a fan of Sam Harris... look at his eyes, what does your gut instinct tell you about him?

[faye]

some of the problems in the world are to do with religion because the christian and jewish element don't want the muslims to gain any power and want to have complete access to their resources. the others are to do with desire for money and power and the problem of pollution of the world, is from scientific creations and the industrial civilization.

[khushal]

some of the problems in the world are to do with religion because the christian and jewish element don't want the muslims to gain any power and want to have complete access to their resources. the others are to do with desire for money and power and the problem of pollution of the world, is from scientific creations and the industrial civilization.

One major power was left out after the planet was divided up by the Imperial power(the winners that is).
These were the major civilizations
1. Western Europe(was given to France, Britain, America) all have veto powers at the UN
2. Eastern Europe(was given to Russia) veto power
3. East Asia (was given to China) veto power
4. West Asia(Middle East) (was divided up by the winners and left to be ruled by military dictators which is in turmoil) no veto power
5. South Asia (was divided into three and half of it is in turmoil) no veto power
6. Africa (divided up and left to be ruled by military dictators and left in turmoil) no veto power

The ones with no veto powers are in turmoil because the ones with veto power always intervene

[randolph85]

plunder the **** out of them, but when the natives get restless go ahead and demonize their religion and way of life.