Scholars of Islam Series: Biography of Ibn Taymiyyah

[شمله ور خراساني]

There is a general consensus in the Umma that all the hadiths in Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim are sahih.

Whether or not some story we read or hear somewhere makes sense to us has no bearing on that.

Consensus among which scholars?

What if there are Ahadith that are broven dha'if by some scholars? Are they wrong?

[Badlun]

Correction. Not all narration in Sahih Bukhari are authentic. Later scholars have declared some narration in his Sahih as weak.

But he was a revolutionary scholar.

And stop back biting and talking rubbish about our scholars.

Thanks God sahi Bukhari is not totally sahi ,,thats is a good news of to day

The damage which false and irrational hadiths have done to Islam is the worst one

Criticizing a scholar is not back biting. They are not Prophets or God. Encourage us to discuss these topics not just a reading material paste and copy borring game

[شمله ور خراساني]

Thanks God sahi Bukhari is not totally sahi ,,thats is a good news of to day

The damage which false and irrational hadiths have done to Islam is the worst one

Criticizing a scholar is not back biting. They are not Prophets or God. Encourage us to discuss these topics not just a reading material paste and copy borring game

I think I have said something which is misinterpreted. The ahadith which are classified as weak are not part of Imam BUkhari's Sahih Jaami. The great Sahih collection.

THe narrations recorded by Imam Bukhari which are weak are in other books. Like Adab al Mufrad