God does not exists!!!

[Yousafzai Pakhtun]

A man went to a barbershop to have his hair cut and his beard trimmed.



As the barber began to work, they began to have a good conversation.




They talked about so many things and various subjects. When they eventually touched on the subject of God, the barber said: "I don't believe that God exists."




"Why do you say that?"asked the customer.




"Well, you just have to go out in the street to realize that God doesn't exist.




Tell me, if God exists,would there be so many sick people? Would there be abandoned children? If God existed, there would be neither suffering nor pain. I can't imagine loving a God who would allow all of these things."




The customer thought for a moment, but didn't respond because he didn't want to start an argument.




The barber finished his job and the customer left the shop. Just after he left the barbershop, he saw a man in the street with long, stringy, dirty hair and an untrimmed beard. He looked dirty and un-kept.




The customer turned back and entered the barber shop again and he said to the barber: "You know what? Barbers do not exist."




"How can you say that?"asked the surprised barber. "I am here, and I am a barber.And I just worked on you!"




"No!" the customer exclaimed. "Barbers don't exist because if they did, there would be no people with dirty long hair and untrimmed beards, like that man outside."




"Ah, but barbers DO exist! What happens is, people do not come to me."




"Exactly!"- affirmed the customer. "That's the point! God, too, DOES exist! What happens, is, people don't go to Him and do not look for Him. That's why there's so much pain and suffering in the world."

[Levanaye Zalmaye]

"Exactly!"- affirmed the customer. "That's the point! God, too, DOES exist! What happens, is, people don't go to Him and do not look for Him. That's why there's so much pain and suffering in the world."

Yeahhh.... that's why God managed to misdirect his earthquakes towards Aceh, Kashmir, Afghanistan and other ardent yet poor Muslim areas. I wonder what more they ought to have done to please God and to save themselves from his inflicted pain and suffering.

And to punish Bush, he sunk a whole bunch of Democrat-voting blacks in New Orleans...

[imb706]

Hey, God IS on Bushś side, Bush said so XD

[Master Khan]

Very nice read manana

[Son of Mountains]

Manana wrora to share a v logical story. But still i m seeing some people who have some heavy curtains between their reading eyes and understanding cells of brain..

[Dinosaur Khan]

The receptors neurons of our athiests friends are blocked with some heavy antagonist of irrationality.

[MazloomyarMaseed]

If Athiests are so stupid and unknowledgable, then why is it a co-incidenance that alot of athiests have contritubed alot to modern science than any Mullah,Rabbi or Preist has ever done.

The reason why Athiests hardly go public against Relgion through Media or Litrature, is due to the violent reactions by most Relgionous Lunatics, just as we experienced with the Cartoons.

Ive heard many times over and over again, that if one insults a prophet of Islam, then he must be killed, doesnt this seems like a Mafia style rule?

[Dinosaur Khan]

It is a natural reaction. Muslims dont portray their prophet, why westrens provoke sentiments of muslims? freedom of expression can not be out of bound, e.g a person may abuse my mother, father, sisters, brothers in the name of limitless freedom of speech.

If some one abuse my father, i will beat him down to the breaking of his bones and imagine Prophet mohamad is dearer to every muslim hundreds of times than their fathers.

[ozymandias]

If Athiests are so stupid and unknowledgable, then why is it a co-incidenance that alot of athiests have contritubed alot to modern science than any Mullah,Rabbi or Preist has ever done.

The reason why Athiests hardly go public against Relgion through Media or Litrature, is due to the violent reactions by most Relgionous Lunatics, just as we experienced with the Cartoons.

Ive heard many times over and over again, that if one insults a prophet of Islam, then he must be killed, doesnt this seems like a Mafia style rule?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religiosity_and_intelligence

Select quotes:
"His results, published in the scientific journal Intelligence demonstrated that on average, Atheists scored 1.95 IQ points higher than Agnostics, 3.82 points higher than Liberal persuasions, and 5.89 IQ points higher than Dogmatic persuasions."

"The study analysed the issue from several viewpoints. Firstly, using data from a U.S. study of 6,825 adolescents, the authors found that atheists scored 6 g-IQ points higher than those adhering to a religion."

"Among the sample of 137 countries, only 23 (17%) had more than 20% of atheists, which constituted “virtually all the higher IQ countries.” The authors reported a correlation of 0.60 between atheism rates and level of intelligence, which is “highly statistically significant.”"

I would say that it's pretty well proven that if Atheists are 'stupid' the religious are even more so.

[ozymandias]

It is a natural reaction. Muslims dont portray their prophet, why westrens provoke sentiments of muslims? freedom of expression can not be out of bound, e.g a person may abuse my mother, father, sisters, brothers in the name of limitless freedom of speech.

You are right -- there are no such bounds to free speech. If they want to 'abuse' (through the use of free speech, as opposed to the oppression of human rights) they have they right to do so.

If some one abuse my father, i will beat him down to the breaking of his bones

Assuming, again, that you are deliberately using the word 'abuse' to refer to the exercise of free speech, and not physical abuse, or the repression of rights, this is why you are looked down upon by civilized society.

and imagine Prophet mohamad is dearer to every muslim hundreds of times than their fathers.

So? Repression of free speech is still not the answer, and your rules still only apply to you. That is all the 'Western' world is asking -- you can live your life however you choose -- just do not force your rules on others.

[MazloomyarMaseed]

Its understandable to defend your father from an attack in a physical form. But however, one should have the right to question faith, on a intellectual level, iam not speaking about oppression of ones desire to follow a faith, but however more of a debate and a knowledge gainer type of understanding, If Mullahs,Priests and Rabbis have no fear in debating or defending their faith on a intellectual level, then why should it be prohibited or outlawed if anything is true and nothing is wrong.

[ozymandias]

Its understandable to defend your father from an attack in a physical form.

Self defense, and defense of one's loved ones from physical attack is justifiable.

But however, one should have the right to question faith, on a intellectual level, iam not speaking about oppression of ones desire to follow a faith, but however more of a debate and a knowledge gainer type of understanding,

Indeed. Not to mention the fact I keep harping on -- you do not have the right to force other's to follow your rules, you just have to respect their right to decide which rules, or religion (or lack of religion) that they decide to follow.

If Mullahs,Priests and Rabbis have no fear in debating or defending their faith on a intellectual level, then why should it be prohibited or outlawed if anything is true and nothing is wrong.

Exactly.

[MazloomyarMaseed]

If Relgion Is brought onto the table of Intellectuality and reason, then maybe all respected faiths will be taken away from the hands of those lunatics who use it as a tool to bring fear onto Mankind.

Everybody has the right to question Faith, but this doesnt mean one should violently oppose it to satisfy their own low self esteem.

Everybody has some form of faith, Faith is something you keep to yourself, but as history has proven, Due to relgion and faith, alot of bloodshed has happened with no beneficial resuts,as a non Atheist I respect their right to express and question faith, as it will be alot more peaceful than speaking to lunatics who abuse faith as a tool of conquest.

[imb706]

I dont have a prophet though.

[Dinosaur Khan]

You are right -- there are no such bounds to free speech. If they want to 'abuse' (through the use of free speech, as opposed to the oppression of human rights) they have they right to do so.

You are justifying abusive abuses and calling names in the name of freedom of speech?.........As expected from a member of morally deterioted westren society.

Assuming, again, that you are deliberately using the word 'abuse' to refer to the exercise of free speech, and not physical abuse, or the repression of rights, this is why you are looked down upon by civilized society.

You people are materialistically advanced but dont claim your society as "civilized"