Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pashtun strength in parliamant wanes thank to Talibums

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pashtun strength in parliamant wanes thank to Talibums

    In previous parliamant out of 249 seat Pashtuns occupied 122 or 123 which roughly made 49-50% of entire parliamant.

    Now even from majority Pashtun province Ghazni all seats are won by Hazaras, according to preliminary count, while Helmad over 90% Pashtun only handfull Pashtuns made it, similarly Pashtuns seems to have suffered in prodominant Pashtun provinces such as Kundoz and Baghlan and as well as other province in which Pashtun make up large minority such as Balkh, Badghis etc.


    Pashtuns strength in Afghan parliament diminished



    ISLAMABAD: Pashtuns in Afghanistan have suffered a serious setback after the September 18 parliamentary elections that has reduced their presence in the Afghan National Assembly, preliminary results of the poll show.

    According to the results of the second national polls of the Wolesi Jirga – the lower house of parliament – the largest ethnic group of Afghanistan, Pashtuns, have lost their dominance in the parliament.

    During an interview with The Express Tribune, Deputy Speaker of the Afghan National Assembly Mirwais Yasini admitted that barely 100 Pashtun candidates could make it to the house of 249 members, which was lower than the 115 members who were elected following the first parliamentary polls in 2005.

    Yasini is a Pashtun legislator from the Afghan province Nangarhar that borders Pakistan. He was also one of the candidates who contested the presidential elections in 2004 against Hamid Karzai.

    He believes that the war in the Pashtun provinces led to a low voter turnout. As a result, other ethnic groups such as the Tajiks, Uzbeks and Hazaras, who are otherwise a minority, won more seats than the Pashtuns in the assembly.

    Tajiks and Hazaras inflicted defeat on Pashtuns even in the populated provinces such as Ghazni, Qudooz, and Nangarhar, where they secured more combined seats than the Pashtuns. The Persian-speaking Hazara tribe also won in many constituencies where the Pashtuns have an overriding presence than other minorities.

    In the Pashtun-populated provinces, the voter turnout was less than 25 per cent, said Yasini, adding that it was the highest in the Turkmen, Uzbek and Tajik-populated provinces in the north – generally between 50 and 60 per cent. Surprisingly, the turnout also remained low (34 per cent) in the capital Kabul, which is dominated by Tajiks.

    According to Yasini, Pashtuns in Afghanistan constitute over 50 per cent of the population, while Tajiks are 25 per cent followed by the Hazaras who are 15 per cent. In terms of the population size, Uzbeks are the smallest. The remaining population comprises Muslim ethnic minorities Turkmen, Baloch, Gujar and Nooristanis and non-Muslim minorities Christians, Hindu, Sikhs and three Afghan Jew families.

    Yasini, however, is hopeful that the Pashtun presence may rise in the National Assembly with the ten seats reserved for Pashtun Kochi (nomads). “The Kochis will help maintain a balance in the assembly,” he said, adding that they will be a source of strength for Pashtuns in the lower house.

    Until then, political analysts fear that the insufficient numbers of Pashtuns in the assembly may cause problems for President Hamid Karzai, who has been pursuing his ambitious plan to integrate the Taliban in the democratic setup of the country.

    Karzai and Taliban represent Afghanistan’s largest ethnic group of Pashtuns and their recent peace talks have been opposed by the Hazara tribe who were subjected to large-scale bloodshed during the Taliban rule in Kabul. The tribe also suffered during the recent clashes with the Kochis.
    However, Yasini does not agree with the perception that the defeat of Pashtuns will make Karzai weak.

    Afghanistan is still largely divided on ethnic lines and although candidates stand as individuals, some blocs in the parliament are formed by regional power brokers based on their ethnicity.

    Others belong to various political parties and factions, many formed by warlords who fought for and against the Soviet occupation of the 1980s and in the subsequent civil war.
    Last edited by ComradePashtun; 11-08-2010, 10:31 PM.

  • #2
    Can this election be deemed as legitimate. I don't think so.

    Comment


    • #3
      ma pa dar ka chay mansor khalku ta yad shi
      moda oshwa sok pa dar khatalay na di...
      .....


      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by ComradePashtun View Post
        In previous parliamant out of 249 seat Pashtuns occupied 122 or 123 which roughly made 49-50% of entire parliamant.
        And we wonder why this country is run by incompetent individuals? The Deputy Speaker of Lower House Mr Yasini does not even know the constitution and plays the ethnic card at the first opportunity to his ISI masters.

        Whether 2 people voted in Helmand or Paktika or 1 million voted, the Pashtuns got their allocations from their respective provinces. So the issue of there was war in Pashtun provinces does not make sense since Pashtuns got their allocations in their provinces.

        As far as the North is concerned, the Pashtun's never had the numbers to get more than 1 or at best 2 seats (in Qundoz) in a few Northern Provinces.
        They lost 20 of their 25 seats in the north for two reasons:

        Times have changed dramatically from 4-5 years ago since the last parliamentary election. In the last election Tajiks were in a delusional ‘we are all Muslim and Afghan’ mood in the post-Taliban euphoria and Tajiks actually voted for Pashtuns whom played the religious card wisely. The country is far more ethnically polarized today.

        Secondly and just as importantly, Tajiks learned from the Hazaras and voted more intelligently this time. For example, in previous election of 2005 in the province of Balkh (60% Tajik), the top two vote getters were Tajiks, who combined between them got over 55% of the total votes for the province. However only 3 out of 11 representatives of Balkh were Tajik. This time around, Tajiks voted in terms of candidates from their districts and spread their votes around in provinces like Balkh, Kapisa, Takhar, Baghlan, Qundoz, Baghdis and thus reaped the benefits.

        Essentially the 20 Pashtuns in the North who were voted in by Tajiks, were now kicked out by Tajiks.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Shadow Caster
          Khidr, This is not a fair system then, because Pashtuns are a majority in Afghanistan

          so they are supposed to have more seats?
          LOL

          Pashtun's might just the largest ethnic group in Afghanistan, even though that claim of Pashtun's being largest ethnic group has not been proven in any impartial census. The only 'census' started by Pro-Pashtunist Daud Khan and finished and released by Pashtunist Taraki, does not satisfy anyone's notion of impartiality. A few farsi articles have been written by government workers of the time who have mentioned Hafizullah Amin's extreme shock at discovering Pashtuns made up only 38% and Tajiks 36% in the census and his immediate orders to 'review the results.'

          The estimate of Pashtuns being even a percentage over 40% and Tajiks being less than 35-37% is pure fantasy created by Pashtun Kings of the past to give legitimacy to their rule.

          There is a reason why Tajiks demanded a census in 2001 Loya Jirga, to which Karzai agreed but he has not gone ahead with it 10 years later now. An impartial and transparent census conducted by the U.N would break the spine of facists who have created fake figures over the last 100 years to justify their rule and tyranny.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Shadow Caster
            Well, you got to agree, that no less than 3 million pashtuns are still outside of Afghanistan, staying in Pakistan. It makes a big difference for a country with small population like afghanistan.
            I'm sure you would agree there are approx 1.2 million Tajiks in Pakistan, and another 1 million in Iran and Central Asian Republics combined.


            The same objection as yours was raised by Pashtuns in the Loya-Jirga in 2001, it was decided that the U.N would use its organizations data and resources to make an educated estimate of Afghan refugees in Iran, Pakistan and Central Asian Republics and incorporate that into the Census. Karzai agreed.

            We are still waiting for the census Mr Karzai.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Shadow Caster
              Well, you got to agree, that no less than 3 million pashtuns are still outside of Afghanistan, staying in Pakistan. It makes a big difference for a country with small population like afghanistan.
              Over 1 million afghans still live in iran and amongst them the majority is tajiks and hazaras.

              Comment

              Working...
              X