Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Haqqani’s two sons mediating in Kurram

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Haqqani’s two sons mediating in Kurram

    Haqqani’s two sons mediating in Kurram

    Haqqani’s two sons mediating in Kurram
    By Our Correspondent
    Thursday, 21 Oct, 2010


    A soldier holds a rocket launcher while standing in a bunker on a hill in Sadda, a town in Kurram Agency. -Reuters File Photo
    WORLD
    ‘Pakistan plans to target militants in North Waziristan’
    ISLAMABAD: The three-year fragile and ineffective efforts for peace between warring sectarian tribes in Kurram Agency have received an unexpected boost in the shape of the controversial Haqqani network which is now trying to play peace broker.

    This has been confirmed by more than one source from among the key players involved in the peace process.

    The entry of the Haqqanis in the Kurram peace talks, which date back to 2007, has surprised many. After all, the network is usually mentioned in terms of its war theatre in Afghanistan and its base in North Waziristan. The US has been pressurising the government for months to dislodge the Haqqanis from North Waziristan.

    Khalil and Ibrahim, sons of the network’s founder Jalaluddin Haqqani, have reportedly been meeting tribal elders from the Kurram in Peshawar and Islamabad to end the hostilities between the local tribes and bring peace to the area which has witnessed some of the worst clashes in its history over the past three years.

    The last round of talks was held in Islamabad on Oct 10. “They first turned up at a meeting held in Peshawar in the first week of September,” a tribal elder told Dawn.

    This account is corroborated by another elder who adds that the two brothers were also present at the second meeting in the provincial capital on Sept 16 and then at a subsequent one in Islamabad.

    It is expected that elders and mediators will put their heads together in the next few days yet again to ensure sustainable peace in the area.

    Although the ongoing spate of violence dates back to 2007 and the peace efforts to 2008, the Haqqanis have been in contact with the rival tribes since early last year.

    In the early phase, Haqqani’s senior ‘commanders’ negotiated with all the groups in Kurram on his behalf. But the talks remained inconclusive.

    Now he has nominated his two younger sons which shows how important the region has become for the group.

    However, the people of the violence-wracked Kurram are apprehensive of the aims of the mediators.

    Not only are they wary of those involved in fighting in Pakistan and Afghanistan, but also because they think that the involvement of the Haqqanis may not be possible without the tacit approval of the military which is reported to enjoy links with this group of Afghan militants.

    Such suspicions gain credence against the backdrop of reports that members of the Haqqani clan visited Peshawar and Islamabad for the talks.

    Some reports suggest that the Haqqanis have sought full authority and ‘machlaka’ (bond) from rival factions before unveiling a new peace agreement. The proposed deal will be binding on all parties.

    However some groups are reluctant to give full authority and machlaka to the ‘mediators’.

    Instead, they are stressing that the Murree/Islamabad agreement signed by all tribes be implemented.The government had brokered the agreement in Murree that was signed on Oct 16, 2008.

    Under the agreement, the rival tribes deposited Rs20 million to the local authorities as guarantee that they would refrain from fighting in the future.

    But the five-point agreement which covers all major issues could not be implemented.

    Tribesmen blame a lack of interest on the part of the state organs for this.

    According to some reports, the tribesmen have sought the release of the people kidnapped during an attack on a convoy on the Thall-Parachinar road in July.

    The Haqqanis’ interest is not linked to the welfare of the residents of Kurram but to the tribal agency’s strategic position. The most important among all the agencies in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas, Kurram borders Afghanistan’s Khost province in the south, Paktia in the southwest and Nangarhar in the north, while Kabul is 90 kilometres west of Parachinar.

    In fact, during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, all the major groups of ‘Mujahideen’ had bases in the area.

    The Haqqani group is active in Paktia, Paktika, Khost, Ghazni and Wardak, which is close to Kabul. And especially as Waziristan has become vulnerable for the network in the wake of frequent US drone attacks, the Haqqanis are desperate to find safe locations outside the agency. Kurram would prove ideal for them and this is why they are trying to reconcile with the tribes in its lower and upper parts.

    They are not the first to find Kurram’s proximity to Afghanistan attractive. In fact, Taliban first came there in 2006 when they moved to Orakzai Agency and some parts of Kurram from Waziristan after signing peace deals with the government.

    Baitullah Mehsud, the late chief of the banned Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan had deputed Hakimullah Mehsud to oversee Kurram, Khyber and Orakzai.

    Another reason the Taliban shifted activities to Orakzai and Kurram was that North and South Waziristan were being closely watched by the International Security Assistance Force for Afghanistan and they were facing difficulties crossing the border from there.

    However, the militant groups’ move to Kurram was opposed locally. The residents of the upper parts of Kurram opposed the movement of armed men through the agency. Eventually the agency plunged into bloody clashes in April 2007, leaving over 3,000 people dead, according to unofficial estimates, while hundreds of families were displaced.

    Property worth millions of rupees was destroyed in clashes and the people suffered immensely because of prolonged closure of the Thall-Parachinar road.

    Unfortunately, scrappy media coverage of the clashes gave them a sectarian colour and the involvement of the Taliban was ignored, although the government did acknowledge on some occasions the involvement of a third party.

    For a number of reasons, the Taliban since then have not been able to enforce their writ in Kurram. And this is why they have been forced to negotiate peace, a process which the Haqqanis have joined. Meanwhile, the residents of Kurram remain sceptical about the new initiative.

  • #2
    Karzai in talks with Haqqani: Afghan lawmaker

    Wednesday, 20 Oct, 2010


    KABUL: The Afghan government has been in reconciliation talks for months with members of a Taliban faction closely tied to al-Qaida and responsible for lethal attacks on coalition forces and bombings inside the capital, Kabul, according to a member of the Afghan parliament.

    The parliamentarian, who requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the talks, said President Hamid Karzai's government had been in direct contact with Jalaludin Haqqani, the aging leader of the Haqqani network, which is based in Pakistan and is believed to have close ties to Pakistan's intelligence service. The network is being run by his son, Sirajuddin.

    The New York Times reported Wednesday that three members of the Taliban's leadership council, known as the Quetta shura, also have taken part in preliminary discussions with the Afghan government, according to an Afghan official and a former diplomat in the region.

    The newspaper said the White House and an Afghan who has participated in the discussions requested that the newspaper withhold the names of the three Taliban leaders plus a member of the Haqqani family who were involved in the talks presumably to shield them from reprisal attacks.

    Confirmation of talks with the Haqqani network would indicate that negotiations are being held with more than a handful of disaffected low- to mid-level insurgents as the US and its allies seek an end to the more than nine-year-old war.

    While skeptical in the past, the US last week expressed support for the Afghan government's efforts to talk with senior members of the Taliban.

    Karzai, meanwhile, has asked Pakistan to hand over 31 Taliban figures who have been detained in the neighboring country, including Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, the Afghan Taliban's No. 2 leader who was arrested in February in a joint raid with the CIA, according to peace negotiators in Kabul.

    The Taliban released a statement Tuesday saying no top leaders of the Taliban, known as the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, have been talking to the Afghan government. The statement was issued by Mullah Abdul Kabir, a member of the Taliban ruling council and rumored to be among the figures open to a peace deal.

    ''They mention names of a few members of the leadership, saying they have had contacts with them or at least shown willingness to initiate negotiation,'' Kabir said in the statement. ''The enemy has not produced any evidence despite many claims to indicate that the officials of Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan were engaged in talks with them.''

    US officials have long said they didn't expect the Taliban the hard-line Islamic movement that harbored Osama bin Laden to talk peace as long as the militants believed they were winning. The Taliban's refusal to hand over bin Laden after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in the US triggered the Afghan war.

    That stance changed publicly last week when US Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton backed exploratory talks between the Afghan government and the militants. Top NATO commander, Gen. David Petraeus, confirmed that coalition forces were providing safe passage to some top Taliban leaders who were talking to the Afghan government.

    The new acceptance of reconciliation could be seen as an admission that the war is going badly. Or it may reflect the view of US military commanders that NATO troops have damaged the insurgency following the surge of more than 30,000 US forces ordered by President Barack Obama.

    Richard Holbrooke, US special envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, attributed an increase in contacts with individuals linked to the Taliban to stepped up military pressure that NATO and its Afghan allies were placing on the insurgents.

    Wakil Ahmad Muttawakil, a former foreign minister and confidant of Taliban leader Mullah Omar also denied that top Taliban leaders were engaged in talks.

    ''There is no trust line between the US and international community and the Taliban,'' Muttawakil said Tuesday in an interview. ''Because of this, the Taliban are not serious about talking.''

    He demanded that the US and its international partners release Taliban prisoners being held at Guantanamo Bay and remove the names of Taliban figures from the U.N. sanctions list to build trust. Muttawakil said face-to-face talks would be too difficult right now. He suggested that if formal negotiations are eventually held, it would be better to hold them in Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates or Germany.

    Some analysts believe the detention of the Taliban figures, including some who were exploring reconciliation, was driven by Pakistan's desire to influence any peace deal in Afghanistan.

    A senior Pakistani security official, speaking on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to discuss the issue publicly, said Islambad has not been asked to assist in the talks and does not know the identities of the participants. – AP

    Comment


    • #3
      BLS, what would you say of these developments..? It seems the wedge between Taleban and Pakistani security forces has widened specially when Mullah Beradar was arrested...

      Comment

      Working...
      X