Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Punjab's Hegemony A Reality

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Punjab's Hegemony A Reality

    I don’t want to go into the details of the issue of whether Punjab is a nation or not but there is no doubt that it is a hegemonic political entity or group which has had severe problems with Pashtun, Sindhi, Seraiki, Bengali and Baloch nations soon after Pakistan’s creation and its military occupation of Baloch land in 1948.

    It is also of no use to discuss whom to consider Punjabis and who are non Punjabis.

    Anyhow, as we know that there is an Arab nation and we also know this fact that not all Arabs belong to the same ethnic group as that of Arabian Peninsula. Historically after Arab’s conquests the people of many conquered lands lost their original identity and are now considered as Arabs. For instance, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Libya etc., are such countries which don’t ethnically belong to the peninsular Arabs but the inhabitants of these countries are now called Arabs.

    The example of Arabs which I’ve cited above is enough to explain that it is not at all essential that all the people of a nation must belong to the same ethnic group.

    Original Arab people from Arabian Peninsula who conquered Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Algeria etc. apparently had a religious agenda but this ultimately resulted in the Arabization and the transformation of the people of these newly conquered lands. Historically the people of Iraq used to speak Aramaic language but now they speak Arabic. Iranian people are an exception in the Middle East region who retained their language and to a greater extent their culture as well.

    Let’s now come to the relevant case. In very rare cases there may be Pashtun families who don’t consider themselves as Pashtuns but this is absolutely false to claim that the Pashtuns of Mianwali and Attock consider themselves as Punjabi, though their domicile is from Punjab. For the information of readers I intend to make it clear that Attock and Mianwali regions were dissociated from NWFP and were merged with Punjab after the imposition of One Unit in 1955. Mianwali was once the District of Tehsil Banu before the promulgation of One Unit. Besides, the people of Mianwali don’t speak Punjabi rather they speak Seraiki language just as many Pashtun speak Dari language in Afghanistan.


    There are Afghan families who settled in India during Afghans’ long rule over India. After living for so many centuries in India if they are not concerned about their Afghan identity they have the right to do so. Same has even happened within Afghanistan where people from other ethnic groups, like Ozbeks, Turkman, Hazara have been integrated into afghan nation.


    Now we turn to the case of Punjab’s hegemony which started with the very inception of Pakistan. Pakistani federation originally comprised of Bengali, Sindhi, Punjabi, Seraiki and Pashtun nations (with their historical lands) with a very tiny (9 percent) Baloch population in British Balochistan (a misnomer for the 91 percent Pashtun majority province). The actual Baloch land was the Qalat States Union with Kharan, Makran and Lasbela as its Khanates. Baloch got their independence on August 15, 1947 but in 1948 Pakistan occupied their land through a military operation.

    When the British decided to divide India, the elected members of NWFP assembly and Pashtun Jirga demanded for an independent state of Pashtunistan through the famous Banu Resolution on 21st June, 1947 but, sadly, the British colonialists refused to comply to their genuine demand for an independent Pashtunistan. Above all the British even deprived the elected legislative assembly of NWFP of its right to vote in favor of India or Pakistan. A fake referendum was staged and historical Pashtun land was thus forcibly merged with the federation of Pakistan.

    As an illustration let me start with a brief information about Bengali nation, which had an outright majority with 56 percent of the total population of Pakistan in comparison to the west wing of the federation which had 44 percent of the population.

    If one looks at the constitutional history of Pakistan it becomes obviously clear that the initial history of this so-called Pakistani federation is full of conspiracies to stop federating units from the getting autonomy as was promised in the Lahore Resolution of 23 March 1940. The Basic Principle Committee of the First Constituent Assembly presented three formulas where the third formula was accepted by the Constituent Assembly to approve the very first constitution for the newly created country based on the principle of a Federal Parliamentary Democracy but the then Governor General Ghulam Muhammad dismissed the Constituent Assembly in 1954 to stop the enaction of the very first constitution. The speaker of the Constituent Assembly appealed against the dismissal of the assembly but the Supreme Court justified the decision of the Governor General through the Doctrine of Necessity.

    In 1955 through a conspiracy by the Punjab dominated civil-military bureaucracy the infamous rule of One Unit was imposed to keep Pakistan deprived of any kind of constitution whatsoever for nine long years. The intention behind the imposition of One Unit was the so-called Principle of Parity, i.e., to counter Bengal’s majority. Under the rule of One Unit the rulers of Pakistan forcibly merged NWFP, British Balochistan (a misnomer for Pashtun majority land), Qalat States Union, Sindh, the State of Bahawalpur and Punjab.

    During this period a new (fake) constitution was enacted in 1956 to pave the way for the imposition of Presidential Rule in the country. Elections were declared in 1958 for the next constituent assembly but before holding elections General Ayub took over and imposed Martial Law in October 1958 to stop elections from being held. After the abolition of One Unit in 1968 the Pashtun majority province of British Balochistan was merged with Qalat States Union and was named as Balochistan. Attock and Mianwali were merged with Punjab and same happened with Seraiki State of Bahawalpur.

    In 1970, 24 years after the creation of Pakistan, first general elections were held. But as usual the results of the elections were not acceptable to the Punjabi civil-military establishment and Awami league; Bengal’s representative party was refused to be recognized as victor despite winning an outright majority. As a consequence war ensued in Bengal which resulted in the cessation of Bengal from Pakistan. This was the very unique case in the political history of the world when the majority of a country had opted for dissociation from minority after Bengali nation’s historic and unsuccessful political struggle. This war cost them three million lives.

    Before the creation of Pakistan the British had established a strong industrial infrastructure in our province and province’s control over the natural resources was far greater as per Government of India Act 1935 if compared to what Pakistan granted to the federating units later. Under the British regime the very first government (1937) of Khudai Khidmatgar declared Pashto as the official language of the province and a compulsory subject in schools.

    If we analyze the forces behind the creation of Pakistan the only genuine political force appears to be the one which belonged to Bengal. Punjab had a government of Unionists; the British loyalists, NWFP had Khudai Khidmatgars’ government as a result of 1946 elections.

    Bengalis and Pashtuns were politically more aware and more conscious of winning their freedom back. Even the literacy rate of Bengal was far higher than Punjab and all other provinces, so it should not be accepted as an argument that Punjabis were smarter than Bengalis.

    Likewise, during the British Rule, Pashtuns province of NWFP had a well developed industrial infrastructure with nine big industrial units like Mardan Sugar mill by then the biggest in the Asia, Charsada Paper mill, Takhtbai Sugar mill, Nishat Textile mill, Janana Textile mill, Banu Woolen mill etc. So it is a false assumption that Pashtuns are incompetent that’s why they are not developed. This is another common myth or misperception propagated by some vested interest people that Punjabis are hardworking that is why Punjab is developed. But facts reveal the case to be the contrary. In fact Pashtun is one such nation on earth which has the largest (as compared to other nations) portion of its population out of its homeland, majority of whom are doing menial jobs in very miserable conditions. Just in Karachi Pashtun is the 2nd largest immigrant community with over 4 million pashtuns. A large section of our population is away from its homeland in the Middle East living in very pathetic circumstances.

    Ironically our land is rich of natural resources like minerals, forests, oil and natural gas resources, resources which are vital for economic development. Our water resources are being used to irrigate the vast lands of Punjab and Sindh but our own farmers pray for rain water to irrigate their millions of acres of barren land. All our natural resources are in Punjab’s control and we are like beggars in our own land.


    Pashtun nation and its political leadership have offered immense sacrifices by spending almost whole of their lives in prisons. Bacha Khan and Khan Shaheed Abdul Samad Khan were such great personalities with thousands of other political workers who suffered greatly under the British and Punjabi rule. Our leadership has been severely punished for raising its voice against the blatant robbery of Pashtuns’ resources. The distorted, one sided and biased history in Pakistani text books and state owned media and a complete ban on every reference to Pashtuns’ historic struggle for their independence against the British colonialists is just another obvious character of Punjab’s hegemony. Sindhis are fortunate to have Sindhi as their official language but we don’t have even a single official Pashto newspaper, TV or radio channel not to speak of having Pashto as our official or national language.

    The main purpose of this writing is to make people aware of the blatant Punjabi hegemony.
    This seems ridiculous when false and fallacious justifications are concocted for Punjab’s hegemony which is actually a continuation of the British Rule. Our rich and strategically important land was gifted to Punjab as a reward of its loyalty and services it offered to its British masters to help them continue and perpetuate their rule over India.

    The event of Bengal’s cessation from Pakistan and the open rebellion of Baloch nation, the declared anti Pakistan stance of the once very pro Pakistani leaders like G.M Syed, Mujib ur Rahman, Akbar Bugti is a clear endorsement and eye opener for those who plead advocacy for Punjab’s innocence.

    Punjab’s military supremacy which it got during the British Rule gave it unprecedented advantage to control every institution of this country. Even majority holder Bengali nation was helpless before Punjab to bring about any substantial change with regard to Provincial or National Autonomy. Now that Punjab has got an outright parliamentary majority by merging Attock and Mianwali regions from Pashtuns and Seraiki belt from the Seraiki nation it is obviously a lame excuse to accuse Pashtun nation or its leadership. Punjab, through its parliamentary majority, has even vetoed our unanimously adopted resolutions regarding Kalabagh dam and renaming our province (thanks to 18th amendment by the PPP’s Sindhi leadership).

    The current reign of terror in both Azad Afghanistan and Pakhtunkhwa is the result of the Punjab’s imperialistic dreams of occupying the Afghanistan, which was initially subjected to a proxy war and was later on turned into a safe haven for global terrorists.

    Although the historic events which caused our enslavement was the technologically far superior British invaders but what is shocking for Pashtun and Baloch nations is the fact that their heroic struggle against the British rule ended up in the commencement of just another episode of their servitude to the former British slaves who know very well that Pashtun and Baloch nations never wanted to join Pakistan. Another thing which needs explanation is that Pakistan is actually a cover up name for Punjabi rule.
    Last edited by khyaal; 09-28-2010, 06:31 PM.

  • #2
    This is a classic piece of writing supported by arguments as well as an eye opener for those who are happy with their enslaved status in Pakistan.
    Pir Rokhan

    http://Pashtoonkhwa.blogspot.com

    Comment


    • #3
      Very well written. I actually read through every line. thank you!

      Comment


      • #4
        Very good working your are dong best than the other website.

        8 class result 2020

        Comment


        • #5
          English was once language of lower~class then later englis became sort of renowned- keep mother language Safe and Father language •must • b revered.

          politix is really 4 fugli losers lacking proper home Life pleasures.
          And whom is the dreaded terrorist? If r mutually enemies r offing each other so much thr better- why get r divine - nay- fully celestial hands dirty? Eff why?

          humorous off topic anecdote— stupid fiberal French Canadian froggie shrinkilogist is imbecilic as it didn’t understand the word “mendacious” definition - mine lawyer sister was appalled because mentir is frenchE werd 4 fibbing- jhute dishonest and untruthful - deceitful- he claim 2 have “tons” of indian friends - like attracts like - he is as deceitful as any hindu hindjew etc so i thought of this tale because of utilization of werd “fallacious” why to repeat two words for dishonesty- salley bengaley

          bharatiPanjab has been whittled down and 2 many kirches Xtian edifice - not 4 long because Xtian spread racial filth liquor and cinema- quit Panjab Xtian- out of the milkiway Xtian ruin Roman Empire Ram sita Ram

          so here is mine reaction to article - international appeal in a philosophical manner plus strategic business partnership amongst well wishers- no need to make noise - still waters run deep.

          why Panjab is popular is v alone understand kalapila peril - proper wedlock at vedic sacrosanct arya land - hey this is eastern fringe of resurgent Persian empire and I suggest bangaley not forget this .

          criminal bengal squat at bharatiPanjab and torment Panth 1984 - bengal is Dirty- what kind of criminal would need book to love husband - answer dirty hindu divorced nonveg bengal female squatting at blond brunet California and very bookish and fugli complexion no amount of mantra could hope to cure

          Panjab worship beauty. Anglosaxon civilization is actually identical .

          it was kosher criminality that illegally failed to not recognize Sikh sovereignty- now panthic history reveals pashtun save Panth from extinction which is why I’d do anything for Afghanistan - hey a in Pakistan is for Afghanistan- grow up - proper marriage is absolute undying eternal monogamy something arab hindu jew could never understand- damn zog war mAke ideal Aryan family life well nigh impossible .

          Wretched existence in perpetuity for enemies of Afghanistan.

          i loathe bengal but I revere Zarathustra Persian empire resurgence - it is a good day when scandi boy refuse to retract statement “kill all jews “ I have a feeling he harbour crush on indiot female - miss puja lol she is a depigmented midget madrasan- what a lousy songstress - cover ur head kuti.

          Arabic language has distorted sense of time yet hebrew filth condemn Sanscrit concept of yesterday tomorrow - never is not possible to understand if one refer to yesterday tomorrow plus proper pronoun verb ending - abolish border and let the chips fall where they may -

          - looking forward to bantu free dunya bantu admix mess up fat East Asia so Prakriti always take proper badla - Her Arsenal cannot be trifled with- an earthquake here a hurricane there frigid temperatures everywhere and perpetual springtime at Costa Rica .
          ya

          Comment


          • #6
            Still you afghani people get the things in this pattern
            No-one can help you indeed
            Yes, we are united, we are resilient, more importantly, we are Nationalists. Pakistan Zindabaad.

            Comment


            • #7
              Its more of an Indic/Desi hegemony rather than a Punjabi hegemony. The option is to either assimilate and lose your identity or cease to be Pakistani and be branded a traitor. Most are choosing the former option.

              Comment


              • #8
                Pakistan has stunning geography- there’s a lot to lose frankly- it took oceans of blood sweat and tears to create divine Pakistan Janamsthan of SriNanak Dev Patsahib.
                in traditional RigVedic norms of life segregation, even self segregation is something good.
                Phenomenal statesman NiazUncle (Imran “Khan”) has opened the kcorridor to prove he isn’t majoritarian demagogue.
                So my concern is modi might wish for another population transfer (sanitized word for ethnic cleansing ) once the Dharmic minorities of Afghanistan Pakistan are resettled at Hindosthan. Let’s face it the view of The divine is different in semitic creeds - so maybe strategical marriages can avert this impending scenario of chaos in the coming years - trying to outbreed Dharmic demographic in our only homeland and then getting multiracial Ummah settling at wonder that is India ain’t gonna happen- not on my watch.

                the only thing I like about modi is he’s staunch vegetaryan just like me and he’s renunciate with no children just like me to combat overpopulation- historically 30 percent of India was always pure renunciate for life as to us the mountains forests rivers oceans r alive and to keep the land pure was sacred duty of renunciate.

                i would hate to see international Ummah set up shop at India with torture chambers for our divine cows birds lambs etc India is not a musla butcher khanna never .

                but vegetaryan sufi kin I have soft spot in heart for dervishes of India blood lineages . They r kinfolk.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I hail from nw region of India so I’ve seen with mine own eyes and felt with every pore of mine being the vibrations of bliss divine in the air and aether itself (Akash) - so I’m not just being sentimental- even osho remarked on the air itself of India being different due to tapasya of high level sages - I’ve noticed the sky and sun seem different - in the daytime the sky forms a high ceiling like a spacious luxury room in a palace . At night the sky is low and one can almost reach and grab the stars in ones hands - obviously astrology started here!
                  for the first time in my life yesterday I had a thought that I wanna go home- not home to Vancouver British Columbia (I’m in lousy Ontario) but home to Hindosthan- it took me decades to reach this point but it’s easier knowing The part of Canada I’m in or would like to be at r unceded territory - I don’t wish to reside on hunter gatherers land of nonvegetaryan- even successful legal victory would be a failure - I’m lucky I have place on the subcontinent to build modest home - and supposedly government of India says peaceably working for Khalistan is acceptable as long as there is no violence but I don’t trust the government because a boy from California was just distributing leaflets for Khalistan and he was captured and tortured by the “police” but now government is explaining to citizens that police exist to help citizens so positive change is occurring but if Khalistan becomes reality still there ought to be common defense otherwise usa will colonize different regions of India and China too is a monster - I’ve heard China will split into smaller states - even now China is buying up India which is very wrong considering the genetic cultural distance between China and India - it’s like the distance between german and bantu .

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Once India is totally vegetaryan the air will be so clean. Yes ballai.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Final point for now: Kabul Sangat has carte Blanche in all matters iow all’s fair in love and war (dhan dasam Patsahib)

                      Comment


                      • #12

                        LogoCreate New Topic

                        No IconPostArrowLightbulbExclamationQuestionCoolSmile AngryUnhappyTalkingRed faceWinkThumbs downThumbs up
                        Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.

                        ◢
                        x
                        PostPreviewCancel
                        • Go to... HelpContact UsPrivacyGo to top

                        No part of this site may be copied without permission of the administration. The views, posts, opinions and threads expressed by members of the community here are not necessarily those of the staff and management of Pashtun Forums.
                        Powered by vBulletin® Version 5.5.1
                        Copyright © 2020 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
                        All times are GMT-5. This page was generated at 10:19 PM.
                        Preview

                        • Insight
                          Insight started a topic
                          Today, 10:20 PM
                          https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/26/w...ction-day.html

                          Trump Wants Troops in Afghanistan Home by Election Day. The Pentagon Is Drawing Up Plans.


                          President Trump has repeatedly voiced a desire to leave Afghanistan sooner than the timeline laid out in the Feb. 29 peace agreement. He may want to campaign on bringing home every soldier.

                          By Thomas Gibbons-Neff and Julian E. Barnes
                          • May 26, 2020Updated 4:53 p.m. ET

                          WASHINGTON — Senior military officials are set to brief President Trump in the coming days on options for pulling all American troops out of Afghanistan, with one possible timeline for withdrawing forces before the presidential election, according to officials with knowledge of the plans.

                          The proposal for a complete withdrawal by November reflects an understanding among military commanders that such a timeline may be Mr. Trump’s preferred option because it may help bolster his campaign.

                          But they plan to propose, and to advocate, a slower withdrawal schedule, officials said.

                          The move is part of the Pentagon’s attempt to avoid another situation like the one in December 2018 and again in October 2019, when Mr. Trump surprised military officials by ordering the complete withdrawal of U.S. troops from Syria. Diplomatic chaos and violence followed, and the president subsequently modified each announcement. American troops remain in Syria, although in smaller numbers.

                          Senior military officials believe a quick withdrawal from Afghanistan would effectively doom the peace deal reached this year with the Taliban.


                          In recent months, Mr. Trump has repeatedly voiced a desire to leave Afghanistan sooner than the timeline laid out in the Feb. 29 peace agreement with the Taliban, which stipulated U.S. troops would leave in 12 to 14 months if the insurgent group met certain conditions.

                          The Pentagon is expected to try to persuade a commander in chief who has made clear his desire to end America’s involvement in what he has criticized as “endless wars” — and who has regularly surprised the military with his decisions.

                          The debate also highlights the mounting difficulty facing the February agreement. Political strife, the novel coronavirus and bloody Taliban attacks have almost derailed what little progress has been made since the deal’s signing.

                          This article is based on conversations with five officials familiar with the debate over the troop withdrawal. The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity because the deliberations were intended to be private.



                          The Pentagon is set to lay out multiple options in the meeting with Mr. Trump.

                          One would give Mr. Trump the option of pulling all forces from the country before Election Day. But the Pentagon has other options that would withdraw forces more slowly, with one plan sticking close to the current timeline that would keep American forces in the country until May 2021.

                          Senior officials believe the president may be able to be persuaded that protecting the peace agreement, which his administration sponsored and supports, will require a slower drawdown of forces, to give the Taliban an incentive to reduce attacks.

                          Defense Department officials are also arguing to the White House that they cannot yet guarantee that Afghanistan will not again become a haven for attacks against the United States. Arguably the only clear-cut condition of the February deal, outlined in one of the secret annexes, is that the Taliban must publicly renounce the Islamic State and Al Qaeda before the full troop withdrawal begins.

                          There are currently fewer than 12,000 troops in Afghanistan. The U.S.-led mission in the country is in the process of drawing down to 8,600 troops as part of the February agreement. This smaller American contingent will rely heavily on Special Operations forces and joint United States-Afghan cells, known as “regional targeting teams,” that are focused on counterterrorism missions across the country.



                          “Any reduction under 8,600 U.S. troops will be conditions-based after the U.S. government assesses the security environment and the Taliban’s compliance with the agreement, and in coordination with our NATO allies and partners,” Lt. Col. Thomas Campbell, a Pentagon spokesman, said in a statement.

                          Another factor that has contributed to Mr. Trump’s desire for an early withdrawal is the coronavirus and its unchecked spread throughout Afghanistan after it crossed over the country’s western border from Iran.

                          The Pentagon believes that at least 50 percent of Afghan security forces most likely have the virus, meaning that any training and joint operations between United States and Afghan forces have been paused, halting a key pillar of the American war effort, especially against Islamic State enclaves in the country’s east. But airstrikes against the group still continue.

                          As part of the peace agreement, the U.S. military is shutting several bases. But the spread of the coronavirus has also accelerated the closing of smaller Special Operations outposts used by the elite units while operating alongside their Afghan counterparts.



                          In a statement on Saturday, the Taliban declared a temporary cease-fire for the three days of the Islamic festival Eid al-Fitr, which started on Sunday and marks the end of Ramadan, the holy month of daytime fasting.

                          The Afghan government followed, declaring a cessation of fighting even though officials had recently declared that they were restarting offensive operations after waves of Taliban attacks had killed hundreds of security forces after the February agreement. Sunday’s cease-fire is the second of the entire war. The first, widely praised on all sides and in the international community, was in 2018, also during Eid.

                          “This development offers the opportunity to accelerate the peace process,” Zalmay Khalilzad, the United States envoy for Afghan peace, said in a statement. “Other positive steps should immediately follow: the release of remaining prisoners as specified in the U.S.-Taliban agreement by both sides, no returning to high levels of violence, and an agreement on a new date for the start of intra-Afghan negotiations.”

                          The exchange of 6,000 prisoners was one of the first sticking points after the United States-Taliban deal, as it all but forced the Kabul government to release Taliban prisoners even though it was not a signatory of the agreement.




                          Top American officials, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, have pressured President Ashraf Ghani of Afghanistan to release the prisoners in the hopes that it would pave the way for the Afghan government to negotiate with the Taliban. Mr. Ghani has ordered their release in a series of groups, as has the Taliban, but after the announced cease-fire, Mr. Ghani pledged to release up to 2,000 more in an attempt to use the three-day cease-fire as a reset for a peace deal that was on the verge of falling apart.

                          On Tuesday, the Afghan government released 900 Taliban prisoners, the largest in one day since the slow process of prisoner release started and in what Afghan officials described a “good will” move in the hopes the cease-fire could be extended before direct negotiations.

                          During the closing days of the Obama administration, the Pentagon was also pressing the White House to slow its planned drawdown.

                          President Barack Obama had been intent on ending the long war in Afghanistan, but the military thought it precipitous. Commanders argued that removing troops would threaten what little progress had been made after years of prolonged fighting, but officials also acknowledged the pause would give the a new president time to reassess options. In October 2015, Mr. Obama halted his drawdown. Mr. Trump and America’s NATO allies ultimately added forces after the Taliban had retaken broad parts of the country.


                          The current plan of keeping forces in Afghanistan until May 2021 would allow Mr. Trump, if he is re-elected, to re-evaluate his decision to remove troops based on the level of Taliban violence and how well the peace agreement is working. Some American officials also say the political pressure to remove the troops could be different in a second term.

                          And if Mr. Trump is defeated, a new president may want to reassess whether a continued American troop presence is necessary.

                          Lisa Maddox, a former C.I.A. analyst, said that cutting short the deployment by only a few months might not seem like a lot, but the current situation in Afghanistan was fragile.

                          “It sends a message to our Afghan partners that we are running away,” she said. “Extra time allows for better turnover, which is a complicated process given the U.S. government’s involvement in supporting the country’s security and governance.”

                          Mujib Mashal contributed reporting from Kabul.

                        PostClose
                        "The past is not my concern. The future is no longer my concern either. One minute. One minute of everything at once. And anything before is nothing. Everything after nothing. Nothing in comparison to that one minute."

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X