Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pakistan Paranoid about Pakhtun ethnic identity

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pakistan Paranoid about Pakhtun ethnic identity

    Renaming of the NWFP as Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa in the 18th constitutional amendment has led to a wave of violence in Hazara Division. Eight people have been killed, including policemen on duty and dozens injured. The PMN-N and the PML-Q hold each other’s politics responsible for the unrest in Hazara. Together they also consider the ANP responsible for this violent situation. Farooq Leghari, the former president of Pakistan, said the renaming of the province would create divisions in Pakistan. Mr Nawaz Sharif, the PML-N leader, repeatedly said he reluctantly agreed to rename the province as Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa. Someone even challenged the renaming of the NWFP in the high court on the plea that Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa is a step towards Pakhtunistan. Leaders of the demonstrators in Hazara openly declare they will take revenge from the Pakhtuns for the killing of their companions. The media is giving an unprecedented coverage to the protests in Hazara — such coverage has never been given to any Pakhtun issues that even remotely depict Pakhtun nationalism.

    Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa is a compromised name — thanks to the ANP. This party has a track record of compromising on the Pakhtun interests. It did so on this occasion as well. The ANP should have stuck to Pakhtunkhwa and should have rejected the whole constitutional package for that. Moreover, the constitutional package offers nothing for the people of FATA. How could the ANP, a Pakhtun nationalist party, accept the constitutional package without FATA reforms? It is ridiculous that one of the FATA parliamentarians proposed ‘Qabailistan’ as a new name for FATA but he and his colleagues said nothing about the constitutional reforms in FATA.

    Despite the ANP’s compromises, the way the Hazara protests have been exploited by the Punjab-based political parties and covered by the Pakistani media shows once more that many powerful forces in Pakistan are paranoid about anything that symbolises Pakhtun ethnic identity. The Pakistani state has suppressed Pakhtun nationalism for decades and has divided the people in four administrative units (FATA, NWFP, Balochistan and the Pakhtun territories in the Punjab province). For the paranoid Pakistanis, the only acceptable Pakhtun is either a murdered Pakhtun or Talib Pakhtun. There is so much goodwill for the Pakhtun Taliban and so much oblivion, even disgust for the anti-Taliban Pakhtun. The anti-Taliban Pakhtuns, whether nationalists or otherwise have been killed like insects all over FATA by the military and its B-team, the Taliban, and no one in Pakistan seems to care, whereas the Hazara anti-Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa demonstrations have captured the imagination of entire Pakistan.

    There is so much media uproar over the killing of the people in Hazara. This is justified and those who killed the innocent people must be held accountable. But the same media outlets are deaf and dumb over the brutal killing of over 70 innocent Pakhtun women, children and men in Tirah, FATA, by the Pakistan Army a week ago! All the politicians and news analysts screaming over the killings in Hazara are deadly silent over the murderous act of the Pakistan Army against the innocent Pakhtun civilians.

    The Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa government has made a judicial committee to probe the killings in Hazara. Who will make a similar judicial committee to investigate the killings in Tirah? It is true that the Pakhtun of FATA have no human rights under the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. But the republic has signed the UN Human Rights Declaration that guarantees human rights to the people of FATA. Should the people of FATA turn to the UN for a judicial investigation since the military and political masters of Pakistan never considered the death and destruction in FATA worthy of judicial investigation?

    The Pakhtuns are subservient and loyal citizens of Pakistan and yet there is no dearth of fellow Pakistanis who doubt their loyalty to the state the moment they refer to their ethnic identity. They are not even welcomed to celebrate the belated state recognition of their right, i.e. their ethnic identity being reflected in the name of their province. Politicians and news analysts have condemned the ANP for the celebrations. Rana Sanaullah, provincial law minister Punjab, holds the ANP celebrations over the renaming of the province responsible for the protests in Hazara. There are also those who cannot even tolerate the celebrations and have killed tens of Pakhtuns in Timergara by attacking the celebration rally. The media and politicians of Pakistan have forgotten the martyrs of Timergara, but continue to criticise the Pakhtuns who celebrated the renaming. What kind of state-citizens relationship is this where the Pakhtuns cannot even express joy?

    The ANP has already announced to welcome a separate province in Hazara through constitutional means. Now the PML-N must show the grace to accept the Seraiki demand of a separate province in south Punjab.

    The people of Hazara have the right to demand a separate province in their area, but they have no right to dictate a name of their choice on the overwhelming majority of the Pakhtun. Seventy-three percent of population of the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa identify Pashto as their mother tongue according to the 1998 census in Pakistan. According to the same census, Pakhtuns are the second largest ethnic group of Pakistan after the Punjabis in terms of mother language.

    Let us not forget that the population of Hazara is not homogenous in terms of culture and language. Hazara is also home of those Pakhtuns who have preserved their language, tribal culture and customs, like the Pakhtuns in Batagram, Kaladaka, Oogi, etc. The Jaduns and Tareens of Hazara are ethnic Pakhtun, although they have abandoned the Pashto language. It is pertinent to mention that some elected representatives and civil society members from Batagram, Kaladaka, Kohistan and Shangla have demanded separation from Haraza Division to join the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province in the event of Hazara becoming a separate province. It is clear that most of the Pakistani media and the political forces, paranoid about the Pakhtun ethnic identity, would ignore this demand of the Pakhtuns in Hazara.

    I am afraid peace is not going to come to the Pakhtun land as along as our fellow Pakistanis in Punjab are caught up in fear of the Pakhtun identity. They have to get rid of their paranoia for a durable peace in Pakistan.


    The writer is a research fellow at the Centre for Interdisciplinary Gender Research, University of Oslo, and a member of Aryana Institute for Regional Research and Advocacy. She can be reached at bergen34@yahoo.com



  • #2
    ... And so the struggle continues ...

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by tor_khan View Post
      ... And so the struggle continues ...
      The name has already been changed from the compass province, former NWFP to khyber pakhtunkhwa. And yes the struggle continues for more rights...

      Comment


      • #4
        I don't know why Hazara are upset.
        NWFP had no meaning to Pashtuns and Hazaras.
        khyber pakhtunkhwa is 75% pashtuns and they wanted to change it.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Master Khan View Post
          I don't know why Hazara are upset.
          NWFP had no meaning to Pashtuns and Hazaras.
          khyber pakhtunkhwa is 75% pashtuns and they wanted to change it.
          There is a small minority of Punjabis living in Hazara, that's why...........

          Comment


          • #6
            I mean this is like a Election.
            74% wanted khyber pakhtunkhwa so that means we win.
            they can protests all they want because it will get them no where.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Master Khan View Post
              I don't know why Hazara are upset.
              NWFP had no meaning to Pashtuns and Hazaras.
              khyber pakhtunkhwa is 75% pashtuns and they wanted to change it.

              It is really sad, we have always been good to them, and now when we friggin wanna change the name to something decent they give us hell!!!


              this is unfair and completely un brotherly like

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by pakistani
                Hazaras are always causing problems.

                They should be quiet before Amir Abdur Rehman occurs again.
                Those hazaras are different. This hazara in shumaalii pashtunkhwa(khyber pashtunkhwa) is a division and valley. It is half pashtun by population, and the other half are hindko speakers, panjabis, syeds, etc.
                http://i29.tinypic.com/2a6j8jm.gif

                Comment


                • #9
                  Da parun DAWN che yo lazh koti related article wo:




                  RENAMING the NWFP Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa has led to expected protests in the non-Pakhtun areas of the province. In Hazara these protests turned violent recently.

                  While it is clear that the province’s Pakhtun population was largely in favour of the name change, the latter was never a popular idea with the non-Pakhtuns.

                  The NWFP nomenclature has been a divisive factor since 1901. Archival evidence shows that the British wanted to create a separate province since the region did not fit into Punjab. But due to the area’s multiethnic nature they could not give it a name grounded in linguistics or ethnicity.

                  So while in 1935 it was no problem for the government of India to create Orissa for the Orissans and Sindh for the Sindhis, a Pakhtun province could not be created in 1901, especially since nearly half the Pakhtuns were resident in the Balochistan agency, and the districts detached from Punjab to form the new province were not all of Pakhtun majority. Hence geography was given precedence in the naming of the province to avoid dissension.

                  Without tackling the problem of geographical boundaries, renaming the province is a disastrous step. Just like the Pakhtuns want to live in a province which acknowledges them, the Hazaras would like to live in one which recognises their separate identity. Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa would make a lot more sense if it did indeed include all the Pakhtuns on this side of the Khyber Pass.

                  With a large number of Pakhtuns residing in Balochistan and hundreds of thousands of non-Pakhtuns in the NWFP, renaming the province without reorganising provincial boundaries appears to be a political ploy designed to sidestep the real issues relating to identity and ethnicity in Pakistan.

                  The Pakistani state has always been wary of regional identities and has treated them as a threat to the nation and its ideology. Since Pakistan’s main battle cry was Islam, its rulers appeared to believe that a common religion was sufficient to bring people of diverse ethnic backgrounds together.

                  The East Pakistan experience was a lesson that while religion might be the most important marker of identity, it is by no means the sole defining factor. Since the East Pakistan episode, any move towards reorganizing provinces and creating new ones based on linguistic and ethnic lines has been looked upon as an act of betrayal.

                  There are two general approaches towards the notion of national identity and cohesion. The first mandates that all sub-national identities should merge and create one unifying national identity with which all can empathize. This was the approach taken by Pakistan and religion was the main vehicle in creating a ‘Pakistani’ identity.

                  The second approach — championed by India under Nehru — was a pluralistic one, where ‘national’ meant a different array of identities. So, for example, a proud Punjabi in India was as Indian as an ardent Tamil, and while they might not have a lot in common, together they created an ‘Indian’ identity.

                  Gandhi, who was a brilliant political strategist, clearly saw that regional identities could not be throttled for the sake of a single national identity and ideology, and had to be given full and equal share in creating a national character. Therefore, while the Muslim League was largely organised along provincial lines in British India, Gandhi organised the Congress along linguistic lines.

                  Hence there was an Andhra Congress committee long before the creation of Andhra Pradesh in 1953. This issue of provincial reorganisation along linguistic lines was a Congress demand and promise even during British rule, and played a key role in strengthening the party’s political power.

                  The promise of provincial reorganisation was also a major factor in Abdul Ghaffar Khan’s alliance with the Congress. The Red Shirts wanted a Pakhtunistan within India and later within Pakistan but wanted it to be composed of all the Pakhtun areas of the country, not just the ones currently in the NWFP.

                  The time has come for Pakistan not to shy away from issues relating to regional identities and the legitimate aspirations of people in these areas. The death of several people in Hazara is evidence that people of that region are unhappy with the name change and want the right to a separate province acknowledged. Even in 1955, just before the One Unit scheme in West Pakistan, there existed several different ‘units’ in the country. The Baloch states were united in the Balochistan States Union, Khairpur and Bahawalpur were separate states, and the four Frontier states retained their separate existence till 1969. Keeping in mind the main criterion employed by the British government in India — that of the ability of the province to stand on its own feet within a few years at the most — the Pakistani government should have no qualms about creating new provinces.

                  Bahawalpur, for example, was thriving when it was a separate unit of Pakistan and did not show any secessionist tendencies at that time. So there is no reason why a Seraiki province cannot be created in order that the people of the region can flourish within Pakistan.

                  Similarly, what harm could happen if Balochistan’s Pakhtun areas join Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and the Baloch and Brahui finally have their own province? And also, why can’t the people of Hazara have their own province and be allowed to develop at their own pace?

                  Pakistan needs to re-imagine its understanding of national identity. Allowing different ethnicities their separate provinces as long as they are viable is not an act of subversion. Rather, it would be an attempt to create a pluralistic and coherent sense of nationhood in a divided country.


                  The creation of a Hazara-Hindko speaking province, a Seraiki province and an actual Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa will be the sign of not only political maturity but recognition that all these regions, with their diverse talents, have an equal and responsible share in the development of a truly federal Pakistan.

                  The writer is a historian at Keble College, University of Oxford.

                  yaqoob.bangash@keble.ox.ac.uk
                  "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be".

                  "Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives".

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    EDIT: Sorry BLS i thought that was you, since you and Khyal seem to have a certain liking for these kinds of threads

                    Khyal use the title given in the report, DONT add stuff
                    .. Here is the title according to the newspaper "analysis: Paranoid about Pakhtun ethnic identity "


                    Funny how you added the word "Pakistan" instead of the word "analysis' " to generalise the nation as a whole and thus showing your biased attitude to anything Pakistan. Do you have a reading disorder perhaps ?



                    People from Hazaara/Hunza are a minority yes, but they are a signifcant minority, are you whining about as to why they even "dared" to protest ?. And i'll already answer the question that i know i am going in return, ethnicites in other provinces such as Punjab and sindh are fine with name of their provinces and have no reservations if there was a struggle or if they desired indvidual provinces it would certainly be heeded. But that is not the case in Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa, clearly the ethnic minorities are angered by having their name not included in the new name.


                    And frankly there is a reason to be paranoid when guys like Bilour ( The ANP minister who was very active in the renaming process ) make following comments about the people who died in the abottabad riots

                    " To kia hua ? thoray say log he to maray hain, qayamat to nahin a gaye "
                    Last edited by Talal; 04-17-2010, 10:38 PM.
                    It's enough that I know, Our time had a home, In your heart..Was a place..But the glass always breaks..

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      There is so much media uproar over the killing of the people in Hazara. This is justified and those who killed the innocent people must be held accountable. But the same media outlets are deaf and dumb over the brutal killing of over 70 innocent Pakhtun women, children and men in Tirah, FATA, by the Pakistan Army a week ago! All the politicians and news analysts screaming over the killings in Hazara are deadly silent over the murderous act of the Pakistan Army against the innocent Pakhtun civilians.
                      Quoted for truth. Thanks for posting the article, Khyaal.

                      Originally posted by Talal View Post
                      And frankly there is a reason to be paranoid when guys like Bilour ( The ANP minister who was very active in the renaming process ) make following comments about the people who died in the abottabad riots

                      " To kia hua ? thoray say log he to maray hain, qayamat to nahin a gaye "

                      Read the passage I quoted above. The Pakistani government's and print and electronic media's silence over the death of more than 70 innocent Pashtun men, women and children stems from the same attitude. Moreover, up till now, no media outlet has asked for access to Waziristan to witness the gross violation of human rights there. When Pashtuns are target-killed in Karachi, they're buried and their story is forgotten. Pashtuns have suffered tremendously because of this apathy. Don't point the finger back at us.
                      Last edited by Levanaye Zalmaye; 04-17-2010, 10:34 PM.
                      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be".

                      "Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives".

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Talal View Post
                        Bravo once again BLS for twisting everything.. Here is the title according to the newspaper "analysis: Paranoid about Pakhtun ethnic identity "


                        Funny how you added the word "Pakistan" instead of the word "analysis' " to generalise the nation as a whole and thus showing your biased attitude to anything Pakistan. Do you have a reading disorder perhaps ?



                        People from Hazaara/Hunza are a minority yes, but they are a signifcant minority, are you whining about as to why they even "dared" to protest ?. And i'll already answer the question that i know i am going in return, ethnicites in other provinces such as Punjab and sindh are fine with name of their provinces and have no reservations if there was a struggle or if they desired indvidual provinces it would certainly be heeded. But that is not the case in Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa, clearly the ethnic minorities are angered by having their name not included in the new name.


                        And frankly there is a reason to be paranoid when guys like Bilour ( The ANP minister who was very active in the renaming process ) make following comments about the people who died in the abottabad riots

                        " To kia hua ? thoray say log he to maray hain, qayamat to nahin a gaye "
                        you seem to have an unhealthy obsession with my posts. Funny story I didn't post that article,.
                        http://i29.tinypic.com/2a6j8jm.gif

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by BLS_1919v2.0 View Post
                          you seem to have an unhealthy obsession with my posts. Funny story I didn't post that article,.
                          Hahahaha!
                          "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be".

                          "Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives".

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Levanaye Zalmaye View Post
                            Quoted for truth. Thanks for posting the article, Khyaal.




                            Read the passage I quoted above. The Pakistani government's and print and electronic media's silence over the death of more than 70 innocent Pashtun men, women and children stems from the same attitude. Moreover, up till now, no media outlet has asked for access to Waziristan to witness the gross violation of human rights there. When Pashtuns are target-killed in Karachi, they're buried and their story is forgotten. Pashtuns have suffered tremendously because of this apathy. Don't point the finger back at us.






                            Pakistan's army chief, Gen Ashfaq Kayani, has apologised for the deaths of dozens of civilians during air raids near the Afghan border last week.
                            More than 40 people died in what the army claimed was an attack on militants in a small village in the Khyber area.
                            They belonged in fact to a tribe that was pro-government and had resisted Taliban influence, correspondents say.
                            The army regularly reports killing militants in air strikes, while denying responsibility for civilian deaths.
                            In a brief statement on Saturday, Gen Kayani offered his heartfelt condolences to the bereaved families and said he had ordered measures be taken to avoid such "unfortunate incidents" in the future.
                            Deadly strike
                            Last Saturday, Pakistani military aircraft bombed the remote village of Saravilla.
                            The villagers belonged to a pro-government tribe

                            Officials initially said 42 Taliban militants had been killed, but locals said more than 60 civilians were killed, including women and children.
                            Compensation has been set aside for the affected families, but the attack has unsurprisingly been extremely damaging for Pakistan's army, the BBC's Aleem Maqbool reports from Islamabad.
                            The army chief's apology and assurances suggest he recognises how crucial and fragile public support is, our correspondent adds.
                            The army is under heavy pressure from the US to move against Taliban and al-Qaeda militants in the north-west.
                            Human rights groups have said civilian casualties in military operations have been considerable, but have been underestimated and under reported.
                            Relief agencies say the offensives against militants in Pakistan and in neighbouring Afghanistan have displaced more than one million people.
                            In a separate incident on Saturday, at least 30 people were killed and 50 injured in a double suicide bomb attack at a camp for displaced people near the city of Kohat, police said.
                            The victims were Shia Muslims, and a Sunni group, Lashkar-e-Jhangvi al-Alami, said it carried out the attacks, our correspondent says.
                            It's enough that I know, Our time had a home, In your heart..Was a place..But the glass always breaks..

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by BLS_1919v2.0 View Post
                              you seem to have an unhealthy obsession with my posts. Funny story I didn't post that article,.
                              I edited it, hey you cant blame me..Youd be surprised at how similar your and khyals threads are. Anyways apologies on my behalf till the next pakistan bashing thread comes along
                              It's enough that I know, Our time had a home, In your heart..Was a place..But the glass always breaks..

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X