BBC Interview with Abdul Salam Zaeef

[Catya Sher]

Why do you look for contradictions if you're going to keep them to yourselves?! Can you explain why an interview should not be a friendly talk instilling confidence and hence leading to more disclosures? Why must the interview take such hostility to - it sounds like from L.D.'s here from Part I - between the parties? It almost verges on psychological warfare with the tone of berating until the poor man submits and will agree to what she demands him to say for the BBC agenda.

[ComradePashtun]

Guys, guys, guys!


I don't understand what was so special about this frail Mullah's interview. It simple as the simpleton that he is and meets no standard.

Mullah Zuaeeep (frail lol) was striped nacked by Panjabi army officers and then kicked and beaten before haned over to the Americans.

Some food for thought and I would like to have the proto-type Talibans' in here view on this. This joker Mullah is grumbling in his book about how Pakistanis are two face and ISI is a mafia organisation who are sabotaging any negotiations with the Taliban, Afghan govt and the Americans. Here are some one liners and a passage from from his book 'My Life with the Taliban':

"Tripartite talks between Pakistan, Afghananistan and America are always sabotaged by Pakistan"

Speaking of his conversation with the U.S. ambassador he says "Pakistan, I told him is never an honest mediator and will control and manipulate any talk that it mediate and participate in."

And another interesting comment which I would like you all to head to: "The wolf and the sheep may drink from the same stream, but since the start of the Jihad, ISI extended it roots deep in to Afghanistan like a cancer puts down down roots in to human body. Every ruler of Afghanistan has complained about it but non could get rid of it."

[ComradePashtun]

Hello!- the bunch of you, any thoughts then?