Why is it that Islamo-fascism (pan-islamism, etc. )and Afghan Nationalism are ok for many members here but the moment anybody talks of Pashtun nationalism, such behavior is associated with "racism"? Doesn't it smack of hypocrisy and malevolent intentions?
Obviously, Islamo-fascists want to unite all Muslims to conquer followers of other religions by force and impose on them (and the rest of non-complacent Muslims) their tunnel view of life.
Afghanists on the hand have other dreams i.e., they want to eastblish Pashtun hegemony over other ethnicities by over-stretching and over-extending the semantics of the word "Afghan" and associating with it some broader meanings. (It would an effort in futility looking at the miserable situation of Pashtuns).
We Pashtun nationlists on the contrary want self-rule on the territiories between Hindukush and Indus contiguous to each other and with majority of inhabitants as Pashtuns. We don't want to snatch one inch of other people land neither want to concede one inch of our own land to other people.
Which stance is more humanistic and non-racist by the way?
Obviously, Islamo-fascists want to unite all Muslims to conquer followers of other religions by force and impose on them (and the rest of non-complacent Muslims) their tunnel view of life.
Afghanists on the hand have other dreams i.e., they want to eastblish Pashtun hegemony over other ethnicities by over-stretching and over-extending the semantics of the word "Afghan" and associating with it some broader meanings. (It would an effort in futility looking at the miserable situation of Pashtuns).
We Pashtun nationlists on the contrary want self-rule on the territiories between Hindukush and Indus contiguous to each other and with majority of inhabitants as Pashtuns. We don't want to snatch one inch of other people land neither want to concede one inch of our own land to other people.
Which stance is more humanistic and non-racist by the way?

Comment