Jewish wife of Khalilzad says "Europe's Afghan Crime Wave Is Mind-Boggling"

[Iblis_Efreetzai]

Still nothing compared to India lol

[a.s.takhar]

Milton Soldier, Who Stepped In To Stop Sexual Abuse Of Boys By Afghan Police, Facing Discharge | WBUR News

Milton Soldier, Who Stepped In To Stop Sexual Abuse Of Boys By Afghan Police, Facing Discharge

According to both the U.N. and the U.S. State Department, the practice in Afghanistan of recruiting, enslaving and sharing boys for sex is widespread.


Indian woman in USA comments:

'Playing With Boys'

Afghan National Police "raped children with impunity," according to the U.S. State Department's annual human rights report of 2013.

"What we are witnessing in Afghanistan today is a serious violation of human rights," said Charu Lata Hogg, who works for the human rights group Child Soldiers International. "It is a grave violation of the rights of children."

She’s referring to the Afghan practice of bacha bazi, literally “playing with boys." Boys recruited, bought or kidnapped are dressed and made-up to look like women. They dance for the commanders who keep them, and then they are raped, or shared with other men and often gang-raped.

"This is sexual abuse and sexual slavery," Hogg said.


This is the situation Martland confronted in September 2011. He and Green Beret Capt. Dan Quinn encountered a badly bruised woman. She told them she had been beaten when she sought the release of her 12-year-old son taken by a local police commander.

“He didn’t just rape him,” Quinn recently told Fox News. "He chained the boy to his bed for seven to 10 days, raped him repeatedly. When they came to our camp, they both showed obvious signs of abuse and came to us asking for help."

Quinn says he and Martland summoned the Afghan police commander, whom they had installed. They were clearly frustrated. The previous police chief the Americans had put in charge had raped a young girl. Now this one not only admitted raping the boy, but shrugged it off, laughing "in our face," according to Quinn.

"I picked him up threw him onto the ground multiple times," Quinn told CNN. "And Charles did the same thing. We basically had to make sure that he fully understood that if he ever went near that boy or his mother again there was going to be hell to pay."

[maneatinglizard]

Didn't want to partake in these endless arguments, but there are so many lies and falsities that I have to say something.

Dravidians live in south India. I've have read so called genetic studies on various forums. Most of Afghans live in Pakistan and last time I checked its not in central asia.

The parts of Pakistan that are Afghan provinces are not part of the Indian subcontinent, but rather the Iranian Plateau, i.e. Central Asia.

Genetically early aryans are believed to be like europeans.

lol no one believes that except ignorant white supremacists. Aryans are exclusively the IE tribes that migrated into Central Asia, and then spread from there into India, China, the Middle East, etc. The IE tribes that moved into Europe (i.e. the predecessors of the Greeks, Romans, Germanics, etc.) were not Aryans. Additionally, the inhabitants of modern Europe are primarily the descendants of native Europeans. They were somehow assimilated into IE culture (we don't know if it was through conquest or some other means), but their genetics show that they are not primarily descended from the original tribes.

Western Europe and India are similar in that they had large local populations that adopted IE languages (and a resultant culture that was a mixture of the indigenous and IE peoples). The only people who are primarily descended from the IE tribes are some Slavic groups, Pashtuns, and (to a slightly lesser extent), Tajiks.

Afghans are mostly mixed with turks, mongols, indians etc

lol no they're not, but you're welcome to embarrass yourself further to try to prove that.

Brahmins are closest population to those aryans but we don't know yet if aryans went from India or other way around.

There are a ton of Brahmin groups, including Dravidian ones, and even the most endogamous groups have significant local ancestry, so no.

And the only people who think the Aryans originated in India are delusional Hindu nationalists who can't accept that large parts of their culture derive from a group that migrated into India a few thousand years ago. Try making that claim to any serious anthropologists and you'll be laughed at.

Hopefully you was just joking about afghans writing Rig Veda, most of them can't write their name. If not for Indians then Afghanistan will have 0 civilization. From afghan music to bamayan statue, all are Indian origin.

Not worth responding to.

Its a fact we get along with whites, even nationalist whites. We integrate better and don't try grow up as criminals. You guys on the other hand live like pariahs or dalits in USA and Europe.

You can tell this guy has never been to any Western country with claims like this. White nationalists can barely even get along with themselves, and you want to claim that they don't have issues with you?

The sad thing is this guy is desperate to be accepted by a bunch of angry losers that hate him simply for his race.

Wrong because afghans also show strong dravidian admixture.

lol there's no study in the world that claims "strong dravidian admixture" in Afghans. Genetic tests can't even determine something like that. At best they'd be able to determine common genes, but that says nothing about where the genes originally came from.

You also have mongol and turk admixture as central asians look like our own east indian chinki people.

You mean the Turkic Central Asians look Turkic? Wow, what a discovery!

Too bad Afghans are Central Asian Iranic people, and don't look anything like East Asians.

If aryans didn't move out of India then they didn't originate in Kabul either.

Neither is true. The difference is we aren't delusional enough to claim they came from Kabul.

There are only 2 theories about origins of aryans, either Indians or europeans hence indo-european. If aryans subjected indigenous Indians then they did after subjecting indigenous afghan people before aryan invasions.

Wrong again. Aryans originated from the contact between a nomadic IE tribe(s) and the BMAC culture in Central Asia (parts of Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzebekistan). That is the accepted theory, and no other legitimate theory posits India or Europe as the origin point.

As for the IE tribes, the most popular theories are the Pontic Steppe, Anatolia, or Iran.

Indo-European isn't invented but combination of India and Europe for aryan origin.

You clearly have no understanding of the IE theory.

Afghans have high dravidian admixture. If they were aryans then europeans will also have same afghan admixture like you said.

Amazing how this guy is still mentally colonized by Europe. You can tell all he really wants is some sort of link to Europe, he doesn't care at all about who his real ancestors were.

Europe has nothing to do with Aryans.

Here is proof of Indian high civilisation print in blood of afghans. Proof of hindu religion in Kabul originally being from India.

"MDS and Barrier analysis have identified a significant affinity between Pashtun, Tajik, North Indian, and West Indian populations, creating an Afghan-Indian population structure that excludes the Hazaras, Uzbeks, and the South Indian Dravidian speakers. In addition, gene flow to Afghanistan from India marked by Indian lineages, L-M20, H-M69, and R2a-M124, also seems to mostly involve Pashtuns and Tajiks. This genetic affinity and gene flow suggests interactions that could have existed since at least the establishment of the region's first civilizations at the Indus Valley and the Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex."

Afghanistan's Ethnic Groups Share a Y-Chromosomal Heritage Structured by Historical Events

Afghan L-M20 is M357, which is not the M27 subclade that is common in India. The earliest example L-M20 found so far was located in Armenia ~7000 years ago. As for H-M69 and R2a-M124, only one Pashtun belonged to each group in that study, which says very little about the group as a whole.

So try again.

Now post any study which proves afghans are original aryans.

Do you know what a strawman is?

It should be obvious enough that no group today is its own ancestor from thousands of years ago.

Since you will not even read, no point in discussing further. Brahmin is one of population used for "north Indian" to compare with afghans, they are mentioned as saraswast brahmins. “When the debate is lost, insults becomes the tool of the loser". Apolo


We are natural allies of Afghans and will stop here to not humiliate you.

So you accuse your allies of being illiterate rapists and barbarians? No wonder you think you get along with white nationalists.

[Iblis_Efreetzai]

Hopefully you was just joking about afghans writing Rig Veda, most of them can't write their name. If not for Indians then Afghanistan will have 0 civilization. From afghan music to bamayan statue, all are Indian origin.

You act like all of India knew how to read 3000 years ago. In ancient times all Literature was restricted to certain classes of people. Afghan music is based on India? What Cow dung are you smoking man? ...The Rabab, an instrument NOT Native to India is because of Indians ...that doesn't make sense.

But even Hindu Pundits claim that the Rg Vedas were originally composed in the place now known as Afghanistan.

[miniskit]

You act like all of India knew how to read 3000 years ago. In ancient times all Literature was restricted to certain classes of people. Afghan music is based on India? What Cow dung are you smoking man? ...The Rabab, an instrument NOT Native to India is because of Indians ...that doesn't make sense.

But even Hindu Pundits claim that the Rg Vedas were originally composed in the place now known as Afghanistan.

Rig Veda was composed in NW India, not Afghanistan. Why you people are pathological liars? Indians knew how to write thousands of years ago before many others, forget about primitive nomad Afghans who can't write their name even now.

Afghan musical instruments look like of Indian origin. Indian hindu rajput kashtrriya and brahmins ruled Kabul for thousand years before Turks invasions. They left behind music, hindu culture, bamayan statue as permanent reminder of their legacy. Before you go on rant about Bamayan being bhudists. Who was Bhuddha? He was hindu rajput Kashtriya who chose different path born in central India. Bhudists and hindus are same thing.

[miniskit]

Didn't want to partake in these endless arguments, but there are so many lies and falsities that I have to say something.



The parts of Pakistan that are Afghan provinces are not part of the Indian subcontinent, but rather the Iranian Plateau, i.e. Central Asia.



lol no one believes that except ignorant white supremacists. Aryans are exclusively the IE tribes that migrated into Central Asia, and then spread from there into India, China, the Middle East, etc. The IE tribes that moved into Europe (i.e. the predecessors of the Greeks, Romans, Germanics, etc.) were not Aryans. Additionally, the inhabitants of modern Europe are primarily the descendants of native Europeans. They were somehow assimilated into IE culture (we don't know if it was through conquest or some other means), but their genetics show that they are not primarily descended from the original tribes.

Western Europe and India are similar in that they had large local populations that adopted IE languages (and a resultant culture that was a mixture of the indigenous and IE peoples). The only people who are primarily descended from the IE tribes are some Slavic groups, Pashtuns, and (to a slightly lesser extent), Tajiks.



lol no they're not, but you're welcome to embarrass yourself further to try to prove that.



There are a ton of Brahmin groups, including Dravidian ones, and even the most endogamous groups have significant local ancestry, so no.

And the only people who think the Aryans originated in India are delusional Hindu nationalists who can't accept that large parts of their culture derive from a group that migrated into India a few thousand years ago. Try making that claim to any serious anthropologists and you'll be laughed at.



Not worth responding to.



You can tell this guy has never been to any Western country with claims like this. White nationalists can barely even get along with themselves, and you want to claim that they don't have issues with you?

The sad thing is this guy is desperate to be accepted by a bunch of angry losers that hate him simply for his race.



lol there's no study in the world that claims "strong dravidian admixture" in Afghans. Genetic tests can't even determine something like that. At best they'd be able to determine common genes, but that says nothing about where the genes originally came from.



You mean the Turkic Central Asians look Turkic? Wow, what a discovery!

Too bad Afghans are Central Asian Iranic people, and don't look anything like East Asians.



Neither is true. The difference is we aren't delusional enough to claim they came from Kabul.



Wrong again. Aryans originated from the contact between a nomadic IE tribe(s) and the BMAC culture in Central Asia (parts of Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzebekistan). That is the accepted theory, and no other legitimate theory posits India or Europe as the origin point.

As for the IE tribes, the most popular theories are the Pontic Steppe, Anatolia, or Iran.



You clearly have no understanding of the IE theory.



Amazing how this guy is still mentally colonized by Europe. You can tell all he really wants is some sort of link to Europe, he doesn't care at all about who his real ancestors were.

Europe has nothing to do with Aryans.



Afghan L-M20 is M357, which is not the M27 subclade that is common in India. The earliest example L-M20 found so far was located in Armenia ~7000 years ago. As for H-M69 and R2a-M124, only one Pashtun belonged to each group in that study, which says very little about the group as a whole.

So try again.



Do you know what a strawman is?

It should be obvious enough that no group today is its own ancestor from thousands of years ago.



So you accuse your allies of being illiterate rapists and barbarians? No wonder you think you get along with white nationalists.

Please read article I posted. You are repeating same lies.

[Friends of Baloch]

Hindus are aryans. Rajputs defeated arabs and they never bothered to invade India again. Afghans were always beaten like donkeys by rajputs and sikhs. And now they live in misery because of that. You need to learn definition of boot lickr.

Hindus are Dravidians. The word Hindu was invented by Persians as an ethnonym for South Asian natives, ie, Indians/Dravidians.

Afghans have invaded and conquered India numerous times.

Rajputs are known in history as pathetic skinny weaklings that had no fighting skills and would not fight unless under the influence of opium or "bhang" because they were afraid to fight and could only do so while intoxicated.

Afghans, Turks, Mughals.. all have soundly conquered, humiliated and enslaved Rajputs, who are no different than other Dalit Hindu in the eyes of non-Indians. Rajputs were serving just a handful of Turks and Mughals for centuries despite the invaders only being few in number.

Sikhs are an even bigger joke. They have been driven out of the bigger portion of Bundjab in 1947 by fellow converted Dalits, now known as Pakis.

Its a fact we get along with whites, even nationalist whites.

LOL. You're the most deluded Dravidian on this forum lately.

Afghan musical instruments look like of Indian origin. Indian hindu rajput kashtrriya and brahmins ruled Kabul for thousand years before Turks invasions. They left behind music, hindu culture, bamayan statue as permanent reminder of their legacy. Before you go on rant about Bamayan being bhudists. Who was Bhuddha? He was hindu rajput Kashtriya who chose different path born in central India. Bhudists and hindus are same thing.

You're so full of your own bullsh!t i can tell even your eyeballs are brown.

You have just demonstrated in front of all of us that you have no idea what you're talking about, you have even no idea about your own culture and history, let alone the history of Kabul or any other place in Afghanistan.

Not only that, but you are a pathetic self-hater that insults your own people and think that you are somehow better than your Dalit brothers. You are clearly some kind of deluded spastic with a racial inferirioty complex that knows deep down that Indians are a very disgusting and humiliated people that have no solidarity among each other and are always first in line to offer their souls for a few bucks from the "saheebs".

Indians are a very dirty, cheap people with no class, no dignity and full of nothing but hot air, always trying to show off but have nothing to show for themselves but their ignorance, stupidity and hysterical imagination

Do yourself a favor and get an education. Forget Afghanistan, first you obviously need to learn your own history.

[Iblis_Efreetzai]

Rig Veda was composed in NW India, not Afghanistan. Why you people are pathological liars? Indians knew how to write thousands of years ago before many others, forget about primitive nomad Afghans who can't write their name even now.

Afghan musical instruments look like of Indian origin. Indian hindu rajput kashtrriya and brahmins ruled Kabul for thousand years before Turks invasions. They left behind music, hindu culture, bamayan statue as permanent reminder of their legacy. Before you go on rant about Bamayan being bhudists. Who was Bhuddha? He was hindu rajput Kashtriya who chose different path born in central India. Bhudists and hindus are same thing.

It's simple really, the Aryans were ancient nomadic people and Pashtuns have a known recorded history of being Nomads, where as Indics, have no known histiory of nomadism except for Gypsies who are recent nomads, not ancient nomads. Which means its more likely that Afghans would have composed the Rg Vedas than Some Naked Indians who worshipped Monkeys and Four Legged Animals ...and resemble ape-ish Africans from the Congo ...except weaker, more effeminate and smaller genitalia

The thing about the word "Hindu" is that it is very vague, Because of the domination of Aryans in India, people associated Indian religion with Aryan religion, but in actuality India is a Mix of Dravidian heritage with Aryan domination. so Anthropologists assumed that Aryan religion in Afghanistan was Hindu, but in reality was probably vastly different than what they practiced in India ....for example in Afghanistan cow slaughter was still in practice even in Pre-Islamic times and the cow was not worshipped. This matches the original Aryan practices of consuming beef and such.

There's no way cow and monkey worshipping Sub-African Girlish males who run around naked could have made the Rg Vedas lol

By the way the Sitar is of Iranic origin. Which means it was more likely Afghans who gave music to India, than the other way around. What would India have given Afghans, ....Ooga Booga Monkey Chest thumping? lol

[Friends of Baloch]

^ They are servants paid to do a job. Being poor, they did such job to support their family. Nothing wrong with doing a job and getting paid for it.

I get my hair cut by white, Egyptian, Italian barbers. I pay them and tip them as well. Same with those Indians in the photo. They did a job and got paid.

Bwahahahahahaha.... Barbers arent servants you fking moron.. lmao...

Amazing. Look at the depths these Hindus go to deny reality and try to rewrite their history of centuries of servitude and humiliation under foreign occupations.

"Getting paid for a job". What a stinking liar!

[Mirwais~]

Didn't want to partake in these endless arguments, but there are so many lies and falsities that I have to say something.



The parts of Pakistan that are Afghan provinces are not part of the Indian subcontinent, but rather the Iranian Plateau, i.e. Central Asia.



lol no one believes that except ignorant white supremacists. Aryans are exclusively the IE tribes that migrated into Central Asia, and then spread from there into India, China, the Middle East, etc. The IE tribes that moved into Europe (i.e. the predecessors of the Greeks, Romans, Germanics, etc.) were not Aryans. Additionally, the inhabitants of modern Europe are primarily the descendants of native Europeans. They were somehow assimilated into IE culture (we don't know if it was through conquest or some other means), but their genetics show that they are not primarily descended from the original tribes.

Western Europe and India are similar in that they had large local populations that adopted IE languages (and a resultant culture that was a mixture of the indigenous and IE peoples). The only people who are primarily descended from the IE tribes are some Slavic groups, Pashtuns, and (to a slightly lesser extent), Tajiks.



lol no they're not, but you're welcome to embarrass yourself further to try to prove that.



There are a ton of Brahmin groups, including Dravidian ones, and even the most endogamous groups have significant local ancestry, so no.

And the only people who think the Aryans originated in India are delusional Hindu nationalists who can't accept that large parts of their culture derive from a group that migrated into India a few thousand years ago. Try making that claim to any serious anthropologists and you'll be laughed at.



Not worth responding to.



You can tell this guy has never been to any Western country with claims like this. White nationalists can barely even get along with themselves, and you want to claim that they don't have issues with you?

The sad thing is this guy is desperate to be accepted by a bunch of angry losers that hate him simply for his race.



lol there's no study in the world that claims "strong dravidian admixture" in Afghans. Genetic tests can't even determine something like that. At best they'd be able to determine common genes, but that says nothing about where the genes originally came from.



You mean the Turkic Central Asians look Turkic? Wow, what a discovery!

Too bad Afghans are Central Asian Iranic people, and don't look anything like East Asians.



Neither is true. The difference is we aren't delusional enough to claim they came from Kabul.



Wrong again. Aryans originated from the contact between a nomadic IE tribe(s) and the BMAC culture in Central Asia (parts of Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzebekistan). That is the accepted theory, and no other legitimate theory posits India or Europe as the origin point.

As for the IE tribes, the most popular theories are the Pontic Steppe, Anatolia, or Iran.



You clearly have no understanding of the IE theory.



Amazing how this guy is still mentally colonized by Europe. You can tell all he really wants is some sort of link to Europe, he doesn't care at all about who his real ancestors were.

Europe has nothing to do with Aryans.



Afghan L-M20 is M357, which is not the M27 subclade that is common in India. The earliest example L-M20 found so far was located in Armenia ~7000 years ago. As for H-M69 and R2a-M124, only one Pashtun belonged to each group in that study, which says very little about the group as a whole.

So try again.



Do you know what a strawman is?

It should be obvious enough that no group today is its own ancestor from thousands of years ago.



So you accuse your allies of being illiterate rapists and barbarians? No wonder you think you get along with white nationalists.

Many Tadzhiks have more IE ancestry than us. R2 is not native to India either. It was found in ancient Iran. The 3 ancient Armenian samples are L-M27 which is found at high rates among subgroups of Syrians, Turks, Tajiks, Uzbeks, etc so it is not native to India. Modern distribution doesn't tell us where a haplogroup originated. Biased Hindus clearly had to stick their agenda into that study. They are obsessed with Pashtuns.

Khalilzad's wife is very right-wing. You see no signs of Afghanyat in their son whose name is Alexander. Clearly she has contempt for Pashtuns!

[Iblis_Efreetzai]

This creepy looking Tales from the Crypt throwback is why Khalilzad's nuts are in a clench? ....You've got to be kidding me.

[miniskit]

Hindus are Dravidians. The word Hindu was invented by Persians as an ethnonym for South Asian natives, ie, Indians/Dravidians.

Afghans have invaded and conquered India numerous times.

Rajputs are known in history as pathetic skinny weaklings that had no fighting skills and would not fight unless under the influence of opium or "bhang" because they were afraid to fight and could only do so while intoxicated.

Afghans, Turks, Mughals.. all have soundly conquered, humiliated and enslaved Rajputs, who are no different than other Dalit Hindu in the eyes of non-Indians. Rajputs were serving just a handful of Turks and Mughals for centuries despite the invaders only being few in number.

Sikhs are an even bigger joke. They have been driven out of the bigger portion of Bundjab in 1947 by fellow converted Dalits, now known as Pakis.



LOL. You're the most deluded Dravidian on this forum lately.



You're so full of your own bullsh!t i can tell even your eyeballs are brown.

You have just demonstrated in front of all of us that you have no idea what you're talking about, you have even no idea about your own culture and history, let alone the history of Kabul or any other place in Afghanistan.

Not only that, but you are a pathetic self-hater that insults your own people and think that you are somehow better than your Dalit brothers. You are clearly some kind of deluded spastic with a racial inferirioty complex that knows deep down that Indians are a very disgusting and humiliated people that have no solidarity among each other and are always first in line to offer their souls for a few bucks from the "saheebs".

Indians are a very dirty, cheap people with no class, no dignity and full of nothing but hot air, always trying to show off but have nothing to show for themselves but their ignorance, stupidity and hysterical imagination

Do yourself a favor and get an education. Forget Afghanistan, first you obviously need to learn your own history.

This post doesn't look like written by "educated". I honestly no longer need to guess how far you have made in to this world. Let me guess, cleaning plates in europe or driving taxis?

Rajputs and sikhs beat every invader. They ruled Afghanistan till British saved them. Afghans are still being ruled by foreigners yet we are weaklings. OK

[Friends of Baloch]

This post doesn't look like written by "educated". I honestly no longer need to guess how far you have made in to this world. Let me guess, cleaning plates in europe or driving taxis?

Rajputs and sikhs beat every invader. They ruled Afghanistan till British saved them. Afghans are still being ruled by foreigners yet we are weaklings. OK

Stop wasting your time trolling and go and educate youself. Nobody is going to play along with you anymore, you have already exposed your utter stupidity and ignorance of not only Afghanistan, but of your own Indian history.

[Pakwatan1]

This creepy looking Tales from the Crypt throwback is why Khalilzad's nuts are in a clench? ....You've got to be kidding me.

Pashtun honoring his Israeli roots by marrying fake jew. Great Irony.

[Pakwatan1]

Many Tadzhiks have more IE ancestry than us. R2 is not native to India either. It was found in ancient Iran. The 3 ancient Armenian samples are L-M27 which is found at high rates among subgroups of Syrians, Turks, Tajiks, Uzbeks, etc so it is not native to India. Modern distribution doesn't tell us where a haplogroup originated. Biased Hindus clearly had to stick their agenda into that study. They are obsessed with Pashtuns.

Khalilzad's wife is very right-wing. You see no signs of Afghanyat in their son whose name is Alexander. Clearly she has contempt for Pashtuns!

Tajikstanis are probably the purest aryans left: