Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Afghan native slams defenders of Islam in aftermath of Manchester massacre

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Baserka View Post
    Ramazan Mubarak to all those who consider it appropriate to suggest someone else's mother become a prostitute during an argument online and all those who consider this behaviour worth applauding.
    If one was to tie the mouth of a dog for 15 plus hours in a day and force it not to eat or drink anything, it might wonder what the purpose behind that action is but not you idiots.
    Bloody beghairats.
    Ramzan or not , the language used here on this forum,and some members are specifically to blame for this , is sometimes very indecent and inappropriate.
    On the other hand , Karachi is a perpetual fasaadi.Most of his posts are aimed against Islam,Pashtuns etc.Almost as if his only purpose here is to cause unrest and dissent.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by toughpashtun View Post
      Ramzan or not , the language used here on this forum,and some members are specifically to blame for this , is sometimes very indecent and inappropriate.
      On the other hand , Karachi is a perpetual fasaadi.Most of his posts are aimed against Islam,Pashtuns etc.Almost as if his only purpose here is to cause unrest and dissent.
      He's a nationalistic Hindu that pretends to be a Pakistani Muslim.
      ----------

      *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

      Originally posted by Karachi
      like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post
        Well first off Salafis/Wahhabis are not mainstream Islam thus, irrelevant to Islam itself. But even most Salafi/Wahhabi Sheikhs express that Islam prohibits targeting combatants. So my argument still stands, you and this author are clueless.

        Salafis not mainstream? lol, they are the most powerful of muslims idiot, and which sheikhs? yes there liberal Salafis too, didn't deny that, however there is a huge salafi population which are violent thugs, they are the ones who causing trouble all across the world

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by BarakzaiAbdali View Post
          You really are stupid beyond belief. I really am beginning to think its a structural brain problem you have.

          Where and when in that post did I say I like, back, praise, or adopt Che Geuvera's approach or admire him?

          The point of it was that he was willing to carry out indiscriminate attacks because of what motivated him.

          The Che Guevara Pan Latin American insurgency did not find itself needing or requiring religious foundations to address the grievances it had which was primarily centered around intervention/subjugation in Latin America by Yankee/Western European.

          The Father Romero movement on the other hand had its basis in Catholicism.

          For that matter, the Irish Republican Army existed/exists, as did its militant Sinn Fein arm to address Catholic grievances on Irish soil against an interventionist/occupation by the British.

          The whole point is that people will rally around whatever flag, ideology, religious concept etc that galvanizes resistance to perceived or real wrongs.

          Damn you are so dumb Karachi. Probably the dumbest person I have encountered in a long long time.
          Idiot, why does every one of these groups want a Sharia state then? What does a Sharia state has to do with war with Asad for example?

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by BarakzaiAbdali View Post
            Wrong. As we said, the only robust study out there from Arizona State shows that they never cite the ones you claim motivate them.

            Their own speeches and words indicate once again, whether its real or not is left to the reader to decide, a perception of wrong, invasion, kinship with the invaded etc.

            A religion of any sort or an ideology of any sort (e.g. Marxism, Democracy, Nationalistic Patriotism) can be utilized as a vehicle to motivate people into action but what we see clearly even with the Tamil Tigers is that the motivating factor behind these movements has very little to do with religion but much more to do with politics and international power relationships.

            As I said, two options exist, either you have a mental growth stunting that is profound due to your inability to process basic information or rebut a simple argument or you are an agent provocateur (perhaps you got in some trouble).

            Fool, Tamil Tigers were not trying to establish a state in the name of Hinduism, they were fighting a nationalist war to establish a home land. Again if Syrians were against Asad, why do they need a Islamic state? why are so many fighters in Syria non Syrians? clearly they are there for one motive, to establish a Sharia State, nothing else. Getting rid of Assad is way down the ladder for them
            Last edited by Karachi; 05-31-2017, 05:24 PM.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Firdousi View Post
              @Karachi, you ugly dalkhor, may your prostitute mother be cursed, educate yourself, you dirty b astard. Most of Salafist are not violent people. They focus on being puritan Muslims, avoiding all political debates/issues and on propagating Islam through peaceful means (dawah).

              Please, kill yourself, cockroach. Disgusting bachabaz untermensch LOL
              Stupid Shia Irani Mutah, trying to bend over for Salafis now lol, you are a joke you haramkhor, you are secular, yet you love the Taliban, I have never seen this, only a drug addict harami would be this stupid

              When did I say all Salafis are violent? of course there are Salafis like the Saudi Royals who are opening their aholes for Trump. But then there are extreme violent Salafis world over creating all these terror groups and just look at the European Salafis
              Last edited by Karachi; 05-31-2017, 05:26 PM.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by toughpashtun View Post
                Ramzan or not , the language used here on this forum,and some members are specifically to blame for this , is sometimes very indecent and inappropriate.
                On the other hand , Karachi is a perpetual fasaadi.Most of his posts are aimed against Islam,Pashtuns etc.Almost as if his only purpose here is to cause unrest and dissent.

                Just because I show stupidity of muslims world over, doesn't mean I am fasadi

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Karachi View Post
                  Just because I show stupidity of muslims world over, doesn't mean I am fasadi
                  I don't get why you are here in the first place.I mean, what relation or link do you have with Pashtuns? This is a Pashtun Forum.People from other ethnicities are more than welcome if they want to contribute positively.
                  And don't you get tired of receiving the worst kind of insults from the other members over here?

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Manzareh View Post
                    He's a nationalistic Hindu that pretends to be a Pakistani Muslim.
                    I don't think this guy pretends to be a Muslim.Or he does a very bad job at it.Many of his posts are blasphemous in nature and it doesn't take a genius to figure out that he was either never a Muslim at all,or he was born a Muslim but has distanced himself from the religion at some point in his life.
                    He may very well be a Pakistani,though.Even though it is obvious he hates that country.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Karachi View Post
                      Idiot, why does every one of these groups want a Sharia state then? What does a Sharia state has to do with war with Asad for example?
                      Your moronic mentality is why you have such stupid questions in the first place. All their interviews and the treasure trove of evidences the CIA has analyzed show that this concept of Shariat/Caliphate etc is secondary in the minds of these folks. In fact the predecessors of Daesh advised AGAINST declaring a Caliphate or a state all of a sudden because a state has resources that can be hit with weapons and requires a functioning government that must actually distribute resources somehow to its people.

                      For the Abdul Azzam Generation the notion of Caliphate was something akin to the Evangelical "When Kingdom doth Come" concept.

                      The research and data is what it is. Rebut the Arizona study design and data or else go do what you were born to do and stick those dirty lips onto Jennifer's dad's behind and clear the air of your mental flatus.
                      "2 crackheads don't become any better or stronger by sharing the same crack pipe." - Greatest PF quote

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Karachi View Post
                        Fool, Tamil Tigers were not trying to establish a state in the name of Hinduism, they were fighting a nationalist war to establish a home land. Again if Syrians were against Asad, why do they need a Islamic state? why are so many fighters in Syria non Syrians? clearly they are there for one motive, to establish a Sharia State, nothing else. Getting rid of Assad is way down the ladder for them
                        Wrong again idiot. Pape's research on both movements show that the overwhelming aggregate of data points toward a perceived injustice, a sense of wrong done to a kinship group, defensive and NOT offensive posturing in both historical instances. In the Tamil case it was a perceived sense of wrong even though the Tamils were preferred by the British and when the latter left, the shoe was on the other foot and they had to cope with the other ethnic group rising to power and taking revenge. The Tamil narrative however was a sense of "our homeland, our land, our ethnic group, our language are under duress." The Arizona data, Scheuer's published work, and Pape's universal data set all show clearly that the modern Jihadist have the same narrative and place far less emphasis on a drive to establish shariat or Caliphate but rather operate off the narrative of a sense of being wronged.

                        Your mental stature is that of a midget Karachi. Talk about things you understand, like Unicorns and pseudo traveling.
                        "2 crackheads don't become any better or stronger by sharing the same crack pipe." - Greatest PF quote

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by toughpashtun View Post
                          I don't think this guy pretends to be a Muslim.Or he does a very bad job at it.Many of his posts are blasphemous in nature and it doesn't take a genius to figure out that he was either never a Muslim at all,or he was born a Muslim but has distanced himself from the religion at some point in his life.
                          He may very well be a Pakistani,though.Even though it is obvious he hates that country.
                          You're late to the party

                          The back story is he has always had somewhat of a weak personality. Major news network news causes him to have paroxysms of anger and sadness as if every bit of it is 100% accurate and that there is no back story.

                          He had some desire to get married to some Muslim girls and it sounds like the situation soured.

                          This in turn led him to get angry at all Muslims, especially Pashtuns because one of the girls was a Pashtun or something.

                          Now he has some white girl he is trying to court and her dad hates Muslims so he is trying his best to pick up on the notion of he is "one of the good ones."
                          "2 crackheads don't become any better or stronger by sharing the same crack pipe." - Greatest PF quote

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            You still around I thought you might have been shagging your virgins with your Talib Brethres.
                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Karachi View Post
                              Salafis not mainstream? lol, they are the most powerful of muslims idiot, and which sheikhs? yes there liberal Salafis too, didn't deny that, however there is a huge salafi population which are violent thugs, they are the ones who causing trouble all across the world
                              Even this claim is nonsense, but assuming it's true "most powerful" and "mainstream" are not equivalent. You're back peddling now because you just don't know what you're talking about .....as usual.

                              Huge population? Any data to back this up?

                              Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


                              Originally posted by ذو الفقار
                              don’t try to be smart.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Niazi View Post
                                You still around I thought you might have been shagging your virgins with your Talib Brethres.
                                No man, you got it wrong, I'm shagging YOUR virgins... and from recent events it seems so are they
                                "2 crackheads don't become any better or stronger by sharing the same crack pipe." - Greatest PF quote

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X