Golden's inability to understand basic 3rd grade level mathematics is testimony to how bad education is in Pakistan LOL
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
is there a divide between Pakistani and Afghan Pashtuns?
Collapse
X
-
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Originally posted by ذو الفقارdon’t try to be smart.
-
Men some of you guys are just too much, where did you see cm? Don't frighten it, you are still taller then India and Bangladesh. Look at ranking of countries properly, calm down a bit.Originally posted by Aryana View PostWhat bull**** are you trying to spew? Both Indians and Bangladeshis are ~155 for females and ~160 for males. It just goes to show that your inferiority complex is preventing you from accepting the truth. 183cm is the average of the Dutch, the tallest people on Earth, and you're saying that Bangladeshis are 185cm? LOL. Stop trying to grab other people groups into the same situation as filthy Poonjabis.
Comment
-
I've always been a little curious. Why do these Aryan Afghans that race bait and talk **** never share their own pictures on here? I mean, we Pakistanis are all brown, indic, and ect.
We'd love to see you Nordic Afghans. Post your pictures and show us poor brown people how Aryan you are. lol
Comment
-
The average height for Afghans is 175cm. To be honest, it's even more BS how Porkistan and Sri Lanka are higher up on the list than Afghanistan. The average height (for males) in Porkistan is 167cm, in Sri Lanka 166cm, while amongst Pashtuns/Afghans it is 175cm. Just look at this map on female height:Originally posted by Golden View PostMen some of you guys are just too much, where did you see cm? Don't frighten it, you are still taller then India and Bangladesh. Look at ranking of countries properly, calm down a bit.
"If a lion comes and takes your share, go get it back from the mouth of the lion"
Comment
-
[MENTION=19516]Rooh[/MENTION]
I for one don't think Afghans look Nordic, Aryana is citing an out-dated claim by Carleton Coon, that's like over 80 years old
I'd post pictures of myself but I'm afraid you're just trying to bait everyone here to share their pictures so you can wack off to them.....grossLast edited by Iblis_Efreetzai; 08-01-2016, 06:51 PM.
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Originally posted by ذو الفقارdon’t try to be smart.
Comment
-
[MENTION=19473]Golden[/MENTION]
since you're such a basic arithmetic whiz. Tell us how much of a percentage of difference of Indic genes are Pakistani Punjabis from Punjabi Pahari Rajputs?
Punjabi Jatt Muslim 30% 39% 13% 8%
Punjabi Khatri 30% 42% 12% 12%
Punjabi Lahori Muslim 31% 44% 11% 8%
Punjabi Pahari Rajput 34% 43% 11% 7%
Punjabi Pakistan 28% 36% 16% 7%
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Originally posted by ذو الفقارdon’t try to be smart.
Comment
-
I can't believe it, you're clearly 0 in math. We are talking about Indian component score only, not all of them combined. Pathans score 1/3 more Indian then afghan pashtuns. Do you understand it or not?Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post23%-15%= 8%, When you have percentages, the ratios are already calculated, to say there's 40% higher means you're double dividing the ratios. Which is a skew.
You need basic math skills.
Comment
-
Yeah right, those components are already factored in to their percentages. which means to compute a percentage over the percentage is double dividing. You don't have to take percentages of percentages, it's a redundant step that doesn't accurately represent the number. So the correct answer would be 23%-15%= 8%Originally posted by Golden View PostI can't believe it, you're clearly 0 in math. We are talking about Indian component score only, not all of them combined. Pathans score 1/3 more Indian then afghan pashtuns. Do you understand it or not?
You never learned percentages in grade school?
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Originally posted by ذو الفقارdon’t try to be smart.
Comment
-
Get on with times. Its all BS unless Afghanis are highest on everything LMAO one reason could be too much sexual intercourse with goats have made you shorter. But this isn't scientifically proven.Originally posted by Aryana View PostThe average height for Afghans is 175cm. To be honest, it's even more BS how Porkistan and Sri Lanka are higher up on the list than Afghanistan. The average height (for males) in Porkistan is 167cm, in Sri Lanka 166cm, while amongst Pashtuns/Afghans it is 175cm. Just look at this map on female height:
MG]
Comment
-
Sorry not here to teach a retard how to calculate.Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View PostYeah right, those components are already factored in to their percentages. which means to compute a percentage over the percentage is double dividing. You don't have to take percentages of percentages, it's a redundant step that doesn't accurately represent the number. So the correct answer would be 23%-15%= 8%
You never learned percentages in grade school?
Comment
-
What's your point though dude? Pathans are Pakistani nationals, they live amongst the rest of us. Of course they're mixed.Originally posted by Golden View PostI can't believe it, you're clearly 0 in math. We are talking about Indian component score only, not all of them combined. Pathans score 1/3 more Indian then afghan pashtuns. Do you understand it or not?
What's your overall point here?
Comment
-
You don't seem to have the skill set to do that anyways. LOLOriginally posted by Golden View PostSorry not here to teach a retard how to calculate.
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Originally posted by ذو الفقارdon’t try to be smart.
Comment
-
They think taliban are arabs, they saw taliban on TV and confused sikhs for them. Every muzlim is arab for them. Clearly they can't distinguish between one and other. But I'm sure they could differentiate between sikhs and eastern europeans, caucasians LolOriginally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post[MENTION=1753]Manzareh[/MENTION]
Golden was lying, they thought the Sikhs were Arabs. I guess he's going to say Arabs and Sikhs must look alike because some ignorant American thought so. LOL
Murder of Balbir Singh Sodhi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Comment
-
Purity of afghans most be preserved at all costs as per wishes of Afghanfootball. This is why Pakistan need to deport refugees back as soon as possible before they become pathans.Originally posted by Porus View PostWhat's your point though dude? Pathans are Pakistani nationals, they live amongst the rest of us. Of course they're mixed.
What's your overall point here?
Comment

Comment