Changing demographics fuel ethnic tensions between Baloch and Pashtuns

[Sarbani]

http://tribune.com.pk/story/996578/political-musings-changing-demographics-fuel-ethnic-tensions/

[Sarbani]

The once amicable relationship between Pashtoon and Baloch residents of Balochistan could be at a tipping point, as changing demographics threaten to create tensions between the province’s two largest ethnic groups.

The demographic changes have put Baloch nationalist parties in a catch-22 situation, because the fear of becoming a minority group within a province that shares their name has brought the longstanding alliance between the two ethnic groups on thin ice.

Pashtoons had been the second largest ethnic group in the scarcely populated but area-wise the largest province that covers almost 43 per cent of the country.

Population census in the country is due for the past eight years but the preliminary estimates of population as per 2011 housing listing show that the Balochistan’s population has increased almost 140 per cent on average from 1998 to 2011.

This is deemed the highest average population growth compared to the rest of Pakistan. Statisticians estimate that there was an overall 47 per cent increase in population of the country during this period.



Most of the population growth in Balochistan is concentrated in the northern parts – the Pashtun-dominated areas, giving new dimension to demographic changes in the province. The influx of Afghan refugees and their becoming denizens of the province is considered the main reason.

It is now becoming a Baloch vs Pashtoon controversy – a new ethnic tension between the two peoples who have traditionally been allies in the past in their opposition against what they called the country’s Punjabi-dominated establishment.

These demographic trends might have emerged more by accident than design but the Baloch nationalist parties have started blaming their former allies – the Pashtoon nationalist groups for the trend.

When they partially accuse the establishment for keeping eyes closed for decades on refuges issue – they squarely blame Mehmood Khan Achakzai’s PkMAP for its covert support to assimilate Afghan refugees in Balochistan in an attempt to bring the Pashtoon population at par with that of the Baloch.

This, they claim, is part of the PkMAP’s agenda to grab a bigger slice of the resources, and increase their share in the number of seats in provincial assembly and national legislatures. We interviewed the BNP-Mengal Vice President Senator Dr Jahanzaib Jamaldini, who is a vocal critic of changing demographic trends in his province. He claims that around four million Afghan refugees have been absorbed in Pakistan –most of them in his province, thanks to what he claims the covert support of the PkMAP, causing a tilt in demographic trends in his province.

“Establishment stayed aloof. Now they have been saying these refugees should go back. Even after assimilation of 4 million Afghans into Pakistan, another 1.8 to 2 million are in the pipeline (the ones living with refugee status). A narrow minded political party wants to absorb these too,” he said.

“Unfortunately, there were some political parties here who had chauvinistic designs. They wanted to bring Pashtoon population at par with Baloch population. It was not possible biologically without absorbing Afghan refugees. Our PkMAP friends contributed to this end. They often talk of fifty-fifty based province, (in terms of allocation of resources to ethnicities).”

Pashtoons formed the second largest group – or 29.64% in the 6.5 million population of the province as per the 1998 population data. The government data shows that there were 54.76% people in the province whose mother tongue is Balochi.

However Baloch nationalists dispute this and claim that they along with Barohi speakers – whom they group under Baloch ethnicity constituted almost 70% of population in the province. “Traditionally the overall population ratio in the province was 70% Baloch and 30% others including Pashtoons-Hazaras and settlers”.

Baloch nationalists get irritated when one segregates Barohis from the Baloch.

After a disproportionate increase in the population, Jamaldini thinks the Pashtoon ratio would have increased by 10% in the province. Dr Jamaldini accuses the PkMAP chief of segmentation of nationalist politics and playing into the establishment’s hands for his personal motives.

According to him, the reward came in terms of electoral seats the PkMAP ‘was given’ in 2013 general elections in the provincial assembly. PkMAP is part of the second largest party of the province.

He claimed Mehmood Khan played a role in breaking up of an alliance of nationalist parties to gain these rewards from establishment. “At the national level, the unity we had achieved has degenerated by his actions. Fragmentation and segregation have serious ramifications on what was becoming combined force of nationalists at the national level,” he added.

He said the Baloch nationalists will try to resist holding of long delayed population census now scheduled next year. “First of all, Baloch political parties as a whole are resisting the census. It should not be held before Afghan refugees are sent back to their country. Even the National Party which is in power is against conducting census at this point of time. The BNP-Awami and Baloch members of the PML-N are also against it. Even the JUI-F is against it,” he added.

Published in The Express Tribune, November 23rd, 2015.

[Sarbani]

Great to see Baloch politicians looking out for their people's existence. Wish Pashtun politicians would do the same instead of the cuckoldry currently rampant in KPK.

[Friends of Baloch]

Dont worry, Baloch nationalists and freedom fighters have always supported Pashtuns right to separate Pashtun areas from Balochistan and reunite with Afghanistan or Pakhtunkhwa. The only conflict of interests has been over Quetta because Baloch and Pashtuns both make historical claims to the city.

But as for the traditional Pashtun territory Baloch nationalists support the right of Pashtuns to be separated from Balochistan.

Punjabis are the ones that are opposing Pashtun unity and forcing Pashtuns to be divided into Pakhtunkhwa, FATA and Balochistan.

It took Punjabis over 63 years just to accept even the name Pakthunkhwa but Pashtuns were still humiliated when names of Pashtunistan and Afghania were denied by Rawalpindi and ludicrous hyphenated name of "Khyber"- Pakthunkwa was thrown at Pashtuns and still only grudingly accepted by smelly pakis.

Pashtuns have been too easily fooled by Punjabis deception and abuse of Islam to distract Pashtuns from their true cause of independence from British invented napakistan.

[Loy Afghanistan]

Dont worry, Baloch nationalists and freedom fighters have always supported Pashtuns right to separate Pashtun areas from Balochistan and reunite with Afghanistan or Pakhtunkhwa. The only conflict of interests has been over Quetta because Baloch and Pashtuns both make historical claims to the city.

But as for the traditional Pashtun territory Baloch nationalists support the right of Pashtuns to be separated from Balochistan.

Punjabis are the ones that are opposing Pashtun unity and forcing Pashtuns to be divided into Pakhtunkhwa, FATA and Balochistan.

It took Punjabis over 63 years just to accept even the name Pakthunkhwa but Pashtuns were still humiliated when names of Pashtunistan and Afghania were denied by Rawalpindi and ludicrous hyphenated name of "Khyber"- Pakthunkwa was thrown at Pashtuns and still only grudingly accepted by smelly pakis.

Pashtuns have been too easily fooled by Punjabis deception and abuse of Islam to distract Pashtuns from their true cause of independence from British invented napakistan.

My advice is that both Pashtuns and Balochs make a federation together. Why? Because Baloch can use Pashtuns central area market and hopefully the new silk road in the future and Pashtuns the Sea.

Hopefully it will boost growth for both regions in the future so Pashtuns/Baloch can have powerful navy together

[torkham]

I am surprised to see Pishin with less than 5% "Pashto" on the legion.
1978 was last time I was in Pishin recall it being dominated by KakaRs Atsakzais and Tareens.

[Sarbani]

I am surprised to see Pishin with less than 5% "Pashto" on the legion.
1978 was last time I was in Pishin recall it being dominated by KakaRs Atsakzais and Tareens.

It seems like a false map. There's no way all the regions surrounding Pishin are overwhelmingly majority Pashtun and then some tiny region in the middle of all that has little to no Pashto speakers. I've also heard that Barkhan is Pashtun majority.

[tilla_jogian]

Ethnic tension? Pakistanis live like brother and sisters, there is nothing to worry about. As far as increase of pashtun population, it was always on the cards. Refugees are not going back and there is only so many CNIC nadra can cancel. And we know in 2013 election Afghanistan didn't bother to do language based census out of fear. Anyway lets see next year census in Pak, its clear Afghani pashtun population has decreased and Paki pashtun pop increased more then any other ethnic group.

I can see the future and it seem like things will be good going forward.

[Samandri]

I am surprised to see Pishin with less than 5% "Pashto" on the legion.
1978 was last time I was in Pishin recall it being dominated by KakaRs Atsakzais and Tareens.

Here is the correct map,

[tilla_jogian]

My advice is that both Pashtuns and Balochs make a federation together. Why? Because Baloch can use Pashtuns central area market and hopefully the new silk road in the future and Pashtuns the Sea.

Hopefully it will boost growth for both regions in the future so Pashtuns/Baloch can have powerful navy together

I can see your future, ANA soldier will pay you a visit to see your dance in near future.

[tilla_jogian]

Here is the correct map,

Do Makranis, Baloch and Brahui nationalists/politicians get along with each other? Or they are united just because of pashtuns? Next census will be interesting.

[Samandri]

Actually Baloch-Pashtun tension over the territories goes way before 1947, particularly in 17th century and onwards which saw the emergence of Baloch-Brahui nationalism under Khans of Kalat. In a series of tribal wars, Pashtuns lost possession of Kalat, Kachchi, Kohlu, Mastung, DG Khan and other areas to Balochs. In 1758, Ahamd Shah Abdali gifted Shal-Mastung (then populated by Kasi and other Afghans) and Dhahdar (then populated by Barozai Panni Afghans) to Mir Nasir Khan Brahui. Mir Nasir , after death of Ahamd Shah, expelled Pashtuns from these territories and settled Brahuis in these areas, this gave birth to the existing Baloch-Pashtun tension in the province over Quetta. Khans of Kalat have had locked horns with neighboring Pashtun tribes throughout history. In late 18th century, Marris, who were then denizens of Hasni Tareens, succeeded in overpowering their temporary masters and with assistance from Khan of Kalat, they totally destroyed the power of Hasni and Luni Pashtuns. After this , up to 1872, Marris succeeded in conquering Kohlu (from Zarkun Afghans), Lower Sibi (from Panni Afghans) and penetrated into Loralai by defeating Luni, Musa Khel, Jafar tribes of Afghans. (References: Tarikh-i-Balochistan by Hathu Ram, Notes on Afghanistan and part of Balochistan by Raverty, Gazetters of Sibi and Quetta)

[Orakzai]

This is why ethnic chauvinists are doomed to fail. They'll cannibalize one another and when they've succeeded in devouring their rivals, they're left with no allies or supporters.