Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dissident commanders meet to choose rival Afghan Taliban leader

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dissident commanders meet to choose rival Afghan Taliban leader



    PESHAWAR: Weeks after the Afghan Taliban's biggest battlefield success since 2001, dissident commanders unhappy with their new leader Mullah Akhtar Mansoor are meeting to choose a rival, they told Reuters on Tuesday.

    Analysts say the recent brief occupation of the northern city of Kunduz has cemented Mansoor's power, boosting his reputation among foot soldiers and causing the US government and NATO to slow plans for withdrawing their troops.

    But in the opaque manoeuvring around the Taliban leadership, it is unclear whether the anti-Mansoor faction will seek to challenge him on the battlefield, how many fighters they control or how much money they have.

    A leadership battle within the Taliban could create space for militants loyal to the self-styled Islamic State (IS) to expand their foothold in the region, and could discourage Mansoor from resuming Pakistan-backed peace talks with the Afghan government.

    Afghan President Ashraf Ghani is pushing for a negotiated settlement to the 14-year insurgency, which has escalated markedly since tens of thousands of NATO combat troops withdrew ahead of an end-2014 deadline.

    The two sides held inaugural talks in Pakistan in July, but many commanders, including prominent dissident Mullah Abdul Qayum Zakir, opposed the process. It has since stalled.

    Mullah Abdul Manan Niazi, a spokesman for the anti-Mansoor faction, said a new leader would be chosen within days.

    “There is one agenda, and that's to choose the new emir (leader) unanimously and get rid of Mullah Mansoor,” he said.

    Niazi said the dissident commanders would not accept Mansour despite the Taliban's brief occupation of Kunduz earlier this month, their most important military success since the US-led invasion toppled the Taliban government in 2001.

    Just weeks after the peace talks, Mansoor was hastily appointed head of the Afghan Taliban when Kabul's intelligence agency leaked news that Mullah Omar, the reclusive one-eyed founder of the Taliban, had been dead for more than two years.

    During that time, Mansoor issued statements in Omar's name, a subterfuge he said was necessary to unify the insurgency. But many commanders were furious over the deception and refused to accept him.

    A spokesman for Mansoor was not immediately available for comment.

    Alliances and cash
    One complicating factor is Mansoor's relationship with neighbouring Pakistan. Mansoor appointed Sirajuddin Haqqani as his deputy.

    Taliban insiders say that was partly to offset the influence of Zakir, a prominent commander formerly held in the US prison at Guantanamo Bay.

    Zakir used to be an aide to Mullah Omar, until Mansoor replaced him, and is a prominent member of the anti-Mansoor alliance. The Taliban say Zakir has a power base in his home province of Helmand, but Mansoor has more money and men.

    “In our faction, there are brave and trained people, but we don't have as many resources as Mansoor,” said one anti-Mansoor commander.

    “For more than two years, he controlled all the resources. Nobody challenged him, as he would say: 'It's Mullah Omar's orders',” he added.

    The dissident Taliban faction includes Niazi, a former Taliban provincial governor close to Mullah Omar; Zakir; Mullah Hasan Rahmani and Mohammad Rasool, two Taliban leaders with substantial power bases; and Mullah Abdul Razaq, a former Taliban interior minister.

    The dissidents say they also have the support of Tayyab Agha, the former head of the political office in Qatar.
    There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

    Sayyid Qutb

  • #2
    now this is some real challenge to Mansour faction, these rival taliban have much more credible persons like zakir and tayyab agha and they can gain support of local commander if right resources are met. mansour is already tagged being ISI stooge.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by marwat View Post
      now this is some real challenge to Mansour faction, these rival taliban have much more credible persons like zakir and tayyab agha and they can gain support of local commander if right resources are met. mansour is already tagged being ISI stooge.
      Why are you rooting against mansoor. you do realize that he is the one who is promoting peace with the afghan gov.

      Typical hypocrite paki who wants non violent demonstrations in his own country and wants violence in afghanistan.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by khushal View Post
        Why are you rooting against mansoor. you do realize that he is the one who is promoting peace with the afghan gov.

        Typical hypocrite paki who wants non violent demonstrations in his own country and wants violence in afghanistan.
        i would support mansour if i was a talib, i believe he is the right man to do the job. but here we are discussing ground realities and not personal opinion.
        rival taliban faction can influence the local commander very much and can turn him against mansour, we both know how much poison talib and common afghan have against pakistan. mansour is considered close to Pakistan intelligence agency.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by marwat View Post
          i would support mansour if i was a talib, i believe he is the right man to do the job. but here we are discussing ground realities and not personal opinion.
          rival taliban faction can influence the local commander very much and can turn him against mansour, we both know how much poison talib and common afghan have against pakistan. mansour is considered close to Pakistan intelligence agency.
          So you would support Mansoor if you were a talib. That's still hypocritical of what you believe in. You are against the paki state even though you know that mansoor is a paki proxy. Why would you support a paki proxy if you are against the paki state? Because the paki proxy promotes the paki state.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by khushal View Post
            So you would support Mansoor if you were a talib. That's still hypocritical of what you believe in. You are against the paki state even though you know that mansoor is a paki proxy. Why would you support a paki proxy if you are against the paki state? Because the paki proxy promotes the paki state.
            because you had to compromise on some of your principal, you can't have that transparent word like your imaginations. further i am saying that mansour is considered close to ISI within taliban circles. personally i don't consider him ISI stooge. if i ever tag him as ISI stooges my reference will still be taliban sources

            Comment

            Working...
            X