Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama plans to end U.S. troop presence in Afghanistan by 2016

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Obama plans to end U.S. troop presence in Afghanistan by 2016

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/...0E71WQ20140527
    Politics | Tue May 27, 2014 6:28pm EDT

    Obama plans to end U.S. troop presence in Afghanistan by 2016

    WASHINGTON | By Steve Holland










    U.S. President Barack Obama on Tuesday outlined a plan to withdraw all but 9,800 American troops from Afghanistan by the end of the year and pull out the rest by the end of 2016, ending more than a decade of military engagement triggered by the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States.
    The decision means that Obama will leave office in early 2017 having extricated the country from the longest war in U.S. history. He ended Washington's combat presence in Iraq in 2011.
    Obama's White House Rose Garden announcement prompted criticism from Republicans that the hard-fought gains made against the Taliban could be lost in much the same way that sectarian violence returned to Iraq after the U.S. withdrawal.
    Obama, who made a whirlwind visit to U.S. troops in Afghanistan over the weekend before American combat operations conclude at the end of 2014, appeared to anticipate concerns that he is abandoning Afghanistan. He said it is time for Afghans to secure their country.
    "We have to recognize that Afghanistan will not be a perfect place, and it is not America's responsibility to make it one," Obama said.
    Under his plan, 9,800 U.S. troops would remain behind into next year. By the end of 2015, that number would be reduced by roughly half.
    By the end of 2016, the U.S. presence would be cut to a normal embassy presence with a security assistance office in Kabul, as was done in Iraq.
    The 9,800 troops would take an advisory role backing up Afghan forces. They would train Afghan troops and help guide missions to rout out remaining al Qaeda targets.
    Any U.S. military presence beyond 2014 is contingent on Afghanistan's government signing a bilateral security agreement with the United States.
    Outgoing Afghan President Hamid Karzai has refused to sign it. But U.S. officials were encouraged that the two leading candidates in Afghanistan's presidential race, Abdullah Abdullah and Ashraf Ghani, have both pledged to sign quickly should they be elected in the second round of voting set for June 14.
    Obama said the lengthy U.S. presence in Afghanistan is proof that "it's harder to end wars than it is to begin them."
    "But this is how wars end in the 21st century: not through signing ceremonies but through decisive blows against our adversaries, transitions to elected governments, security forces who are trained to take the lead and ultimately full responsibility," he said.
    While Americans have long since grown weary of a conflict in which nearly 2,200 U.S. troops have been killed, some Republicans greeted the news with skepticism.
    They continued a drumbeat of criticism of the president's handling of foreign policy and national security ahead of a speech on the subject Obama is to give on Wednesday at the U.S. Military Academy in West Point, New York.
    "The president's decision to set an arbitrary date for the full withdrawal of U.S. troops in Afghanistan is a monumental mistake and a triumph of politics over strategy," Republican Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham said in a statement.
    A senior Obama administration official bristled at the notion that the United States would be leaving Afghan forces to do battle against the Taliban alone.
    "We never signed up to be the permanent security force in Afghanistan to fight against the Taliban," the official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told reporters.
    The United States now has about 32,000 troops in Afghanistan. U.S. military leaders had pushed for a force of at least around 10,000, saying it was the minimum required.
    Remaining U.S. and NATO forces will advise Afghan forces, focusing on functions such as budgeting, logistics, and support for security institutions.
    NATO countries have helped build Afghanistan’s military and other forces from scratch since 2001. While Afghan forces have grown more independent, they lack key skills such as intelligence collection and air power.
    As part of the post-2014 force, a small number of U.S. soldiers is expected to conduct counterterrorism operations against al Qaeda and other hardline militants, located mainly in remote areas along Afghanistan’s eastern border with Pakistan.
    "The past is not my concern. The future is no longer my concern either. One minute. One minute of everything at once. And anything before is nothing. Everything after nothing. Nothing in comparison to that one minute."

  • #2
    "We never signed up to be the permanent security force in Afghanistan to fight against the Taliban," the official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told reporters.
    "The past is not my concern. The future is no longer my concern either. One minute. One minute of everything at once. And anything before is nothing. Everything after nothing. Nothing in comparison to that one minute."

    Comment


    • #3
      I have no doubt that this decision will be revised to allow troops to remain in the country but most importantly for the air campaign to continue. At this point, the US is letting their puppets die for them on the ground, their greatest contribution is air strikes.
      There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

      Sayyid Qutb

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by randolph85 View Post
        I have no doubt that this decision will be revised to allow troops to remain in the country but most importantly for the air campaign to continue. At this point, the US is letting their puppets die for them on the ground, their greatest contribution is air strikes.
        There have been several attempts by US military generals, Senators, Pakistan military, and the Kabul regime to have the US withdrawal decision reversed. In all cases, Obama and his National Security Council (Susan Rice) stuck to the decision of a complete US withdrawal. I don't see Obama reversing a critical legacy issue with his last two years in office. This goes along with the US-Iran nuke deal, another legacy issue for him.

        US air power is at a 5 year low. Kabul regime has been complaining about the lack of US air power this year.



        But Obama also made it clear that he wouldn’t depart from his current plan to close the remaining U.S. bases in Afghanistan and consolidate the remaining U.S. forces in Kabul by the end of 2016.
        “Afghanistan is still a dangerous place,” Obama said. “The way it’s going to become less dangerous is by Afghan security forces* being capable of keeping law and order and security in the country, and that is not going to happen if foreign forces* are continually relied upon.”
        "The past is not my concern. The future is no longer my concern either. One minute. One minute of everything at once. And anything before is nothing. Everything after nothing. Nothing in comparison to that one minute."

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Insight View Post
          There have been several attempts by US military generals, Senators, Pakistan military, and the Kabul regime to have the US withdrawal decision reversed. In all cases, Obama and his National Security Council (Susan Rice) stuck to the decision of a complete US withdrawal. I don't see Obama reversing a critical legacy issue with his last two years in office. This goes along with the US-Iran nuke deal, another legacy issue for him.

          US air power is at a 5 year low. Kabul regime has been complaining about the lack of US air power this year.



          But Obama also made it clear that he wouldn’t depart from his current plan to close the remaining U.S. bases in Afghanistan and consolidate the remaining U.S. forces in Kabul by the end of 2016.
          “Afghanistan is still a dangerous place,” Obama said. “The way it’s going to become less dangerous is by Afghan security forces* being capable of keeping law and order and security in the country, and that is not going to happen if foreign forces* are continually relied upon.”
          https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...4ff_story.html

          http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/16/wo...isis.html?_r=0

          Though the number of strikes in June reached a high point for 2015, it still represented an overall decrease from previous years. The 106 weapons fired this June were less than half the 272 fired in June 2014. In June 2011, the figure was 610 weapons fired.
          This is even under the illusion of a cessation of combat on the ground. One can even draw a comparison to the lower number of air strikes and the record high ANA deaths.

          I see the vow of Obama to withdrawal by 2016 as genuinely as the combat mission being over right now supposedly.
          There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

          Sayyid Qutb

          Comment

          Working...
          X