Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Russia to help build Egypt's first nuclear power plant Russian and Egyptian president

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Russia to help build Egypt's first nuclear power plant Russian and Egyptian president

    Russia to help build Egypt's first nuclear power plant
    Russian and Egyptian presidents announce several deals, including plan to build plant in Alexandria, after Cairo talks.



    The presidents of Russia and Egypt have announced after talks in Cairo that the two countries are to build Egypt's first nuclear power plant together, as well as boosting natural gas trade among other deals.

    Vladimir Putin and Abdel Fattah el-Sisi made the announcement on Tuesday at a joint news conference in the Egyptian capital, where they signed an agreement on the plant's construction.

    "If final decisions are made, it will mean not just building a nuclear power plant, it means the creation of the entire new atomic industry in Egypt," said Putin.

    The plant would be built at the existing nuclear site in Dabaa, on the Mediterranean coast west of the port city of Alexandria, where a research reactor has stood for years.

    Putin's landmark two-day visit, during which he was feted with much pomp and pageantry, came as Russia faces heightened tensions with Washington and the European Union over Moscow's backing of armed separatist rebels in Ukraine.

    Boosting electricity generation has been a priority for Egypt, where shortages lead to frequent blackouts in cities, especially in the summer, which have stoked popular anger.

    Sergei Kiriyenko, the head of Russia's Rosatom state-controlled nuclear corporation, said a power plant with four reactors would be built, producing 1,200 megawatts each.

    In other key deals, Sisi said the two nations signed agreements to improve investment and the natural gas business, as well as create a Russian industrial zone along the Suez Canal, the expansion of which has been a priority project for the Egyptian president.

    Egypt has also signalled renewed interest in purchasing Russian arms, although observers said any eventual deals would be unlikely to reorient Cairo's dependence on Washington, which grants it up to $1.3bn in annual military aid.

    Security issues
    Putin and Sisi also said they were both committed to fighting the "threat of terrorism" in their respective countries.

    Sisi, who is fighting armed rebels in the Sinai region, said Putin had agreed with him that "the challenge of terrorism that faces Egypt, and which Russia also faces, does not stop at any borders".

    At the joint news conference, Putin also said that he is expecting a new round of talks on the Syrian conflict, following on from a meeting of some opposition figures and the Damascus government in Moscow last month.
    "We look forward ... to the next round of such talks, which ultimately I hope will lead to a peaceful settlement of the situation in Syria," Putin said.
    The Moscow talks, which ended on January 29, were not seen as likely to yield a breakthrough as they were shunned by the key political opposition in Syria and did not involve the main armed groups fighting on the ground.
    Source: Agencies

  • #2
    Russia is very active making deals with countries. Putin is a true leader. I hope Russia becomes more involved with the rest of the world.

    Comment


    • #3
      Why is PAkistan not making a nuclear power plant, to stop the electricity short falls every day? They have the tech....kind of stupid to use it on stupid bombs that you will never use -_-

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Khostai View Post
        Why is PAkistan not making a nuclear power plant, to stop the electricity short falls every day? They have the tech....kind of stupid to use it on stupid bombs that you will never use -_-
        Nuclear power brings far more problems than it solves.
        Don't quote me or speak to me if you hate Afghanistan, you be ignored.

        People with identity crisis will be ignored as well.

        ''When you cant make them see the light, make them feel the heat''
        Ronald Reagan

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7cmZyOrUA0

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QC9sz0nPePI

        Pashto dictionary:
        http://thepashto.com/index.php

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by DSM0305 View Post
          Nuclear power brings far more problems than it solves.
          The only problem with nuclear power is the nuclear waste, but that can be stored quite safely...A lot of countries use nuclear power without a problem.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Khostai View Post
            The only problem with nuclear power is the nuclear waste, but that can be stored quite safely...A lot of countries use nuclear power without a problem.
            Radioactive waste can last for million of years. Its a problem that will harm the people/country in the long run, just for a short term solution. Many countries either:
            1. Just want to solve the short term problem
            2. The problem nuclear cause isn't immediate, so the leaders don't care
            3. They are uninformed
            4. The lobby have to great of influence

            Also if something goes wrong, with have been proven countless time that is possible(including tjernobyl and japan), a huge chunk of landmass would become unusable. Not even counting the amount human loss there will be, especially in a third world country.

            Take Europe as an example. They either have extreme restrictions against nuclear, or have banned it altogether.
            Don't quote me or speak to me if you hate Afghanistan, you be ignored.

            People with identity crisis will be ignored as well.

            ''When you cant make them see the light, make them feel the heat''
            Ronald Reagan

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7cmZyOrUA0

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QC9sz0nPePI

            Pashto dictionary:
            http://thepashto.com/index.php

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by DSM0305 View Post
              Radioactive waste can last for million of years. Its a problem that will harm the people/country in the long run, just for a short term solution. Many countries either:
              1. Just want to solve the short term problem
              2. The problem nuclear cause isn't immediate, so the leaders don't care
              3. They are uninformed
              4. The lobby have to great of influence

              Also if something goes wrong, with have been proven countless time that is possible(including tjernobyl and japan), a huge chunk of landmass would become unusable. Not even counting the amount human loss there will be, especially in a third world country.

              Take Europe as an example. They either have extreme restrictions against nuclear, or have banned it altogether.
              All those riscs can be covered. The waste is manageble its last long but it not like it is produced in millions of tons. France Belgium adn Germany are relient for their electricity on nuclear power. Its not banned, yes its has strong safety regulations, but it is still used in almost every country in Europe.

              I still see nucelar power plants as a step up, the country can generate more power for the economy, so more money, and that money can be used to deal with the nuclear waste and also for scientific research on nuclear fusion or other power sources that are related to nuclear power.
              Its all about future perspective.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Khostai View Post
                All those riscs can be covered. The waste is manageble its last long but it not like it is produced in millions of tons. France Belgium adn Germany are relient for their electricity on nuclear power. Its not banned, yes its has strong safety regulations, but it is still used in almost every country in Europe.

                I still see nucelar power plants as a step up, the country can generate more power for the economy, so more money, and that money can be used to deal with the nuclear waste and also for scientific research on nuclear fusion or other power sources that are related to nuclear power.
                Its all about future perspective.
                Its not as simple as that. The nuclear waste will still be there for those million years. Of course on the short run it will seem manageable, but as an ongoing process, which will keep adding up to the pile of nuclear waste, it will have severe consequences in a long term. Imagine having a waste that will last for thousands to million years, and now add up all pile of waste made in 100 to 200 years.

                Lets take Germany as an example. The reliance on nuclear power have been decrease year by year, and they have not made a single nuclear reactor since 1980s. By the year 2010, the renewable energy have surpassed the energy produced by nuclear reactors. That even despite the energy crisis they be stuck after the turmoil with Russia over Ukraine.



                Some countries have even passed down laws against nuclear energy in Europe, like Denmark and Norway. Most well developed countries in Europe have either stopped the development of nuclear or is completely free from it.
                Don't quote me or speak to me if you hate Afghanistan, you be ignored.

                People with identity crisis will be ignored as well.

                ''When you cant make them see the light, make them feel the heat''
                Ronald Reagan

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7cmZyOrUA0

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QC9sz0nPePI

                Pashto dictionary:
                http://thepashto.com/index.php

                Comment

                Working...
                X