Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Baloch knock out paki electric grid, 80% napakistan left in darkness

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Baloch knock out paki electric grid, 80% napakistan left in darkness

    Widespread Blackout in Pakistan Deals Another Blow to Government
    By SALMAN MASOODJAN. 25, 2015

    ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — Towns and cities across Pakistan plunged into darkness early Sunday when what officials said was an attack by militants on a transmission line short-circuited the national electricity grid, presenting a new indictment of the government’s faltering efforts to solve the country’s chronic power crisis.

    Emergency efforts to end the blackout, widely described as Pakistan’s worst ever, resulted in a partial restoration of power in the capital, Islamabad, and the most populous city, Karachi, by Sunday evening. Even so, 80 percent of the country remained without power, including the provincial capitals of Lahore, Peshawar and Quetta, an official said.

    The minister for water and power, Khawaja Muhammad Asif, blamed separatist rebels in the western province of Baluchistan who, he said, had blown up a critical transmission line. But experts said the attack only highlighted the growing vulnerability of Pakistan’s power grid, which has come under severe strain since the electricity crisis began in earnest about seven years ago.

    The blackout was also another blow for Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, whose government had already spent much of the week grappling with a severe fuel shortage that closed gasoline stations across Punjab, the country’s most politically powerful province.

    A hastily convened government inquiry into the gasoline shortages, which lasted several days, laid the blame on the state oil regulatory authority. But the sight of lines miles long for gasoline at a time of low global oil prices only deepened public impatience with Mr. Sharif, who was faced with the crisis on his return from a visit to Saudi Arabia.

    Separatist rebels in Baluchistan, a vast but sparsely populated province, have been fighting for independence for almost a decade. The military has quelled the uprising with harsh tactics, including the abduction and torture of hundreds of suspected separatists, and there is little open fighting. Instead, the rebels mostly carry out guerrilla attacks on government installations such as rail lines, gas pipelines and electrical towers.

    The rebels have attacked the electricity grid in Baluchistan three times since Jan. 13, said Muhammad Younas Dhaga, a senior official at the water and power ministry, during a briefing to journalists on Sunday. The third assault, which took place just before midnight on Saturday, blew up two important towers near the Uch power station, tripping the national grid.

    Mr. Dhaga said that Pakistan’s national grid was generating 7,000 megawatts of power but needed about 4,500 megawatts more to meet demand. Power plants that are currently closed will be brought online, and the crisis should have significantly eased by Monday, he said.

    Fixing Pakistan’s dilapidated electricity system was a central campaign promise of Mr. Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-N party when it won a landslide victory in the May 2013 general election. But his government has failed to deliver on those promises, with regular blackouts of up to 10 hours per day in the major cities and 20 hours in rural areas.

    The sheer scale of the crisis accounts for part of the problem, experts say. The national power system is afflicted by complex debt issues, political interference, crumbling transmission lines and widespread electricity theft. Those problems are compounded by the refusal of many government departments and military bases to pay their electricity bills, which has starved regional power companies of the funds needed to upgrade the power infrastructure.

    Last year, Mr. Sharif signed agreements with the Chinese government to help build four new power stations. But it will be many years before those projects come online, and the government has made little visible progress toward their completion since announcing the initiatives.

    Pakistan’s political tumult has also played a role in the crisis. Since August, Mr. Sharif has been under political assault by the opposition politician Imran Khan, who led a sit-in outside Parliament for four months over accusations that Mr. Sharif’s party had rigged the last election.

    Although that protest ended recently, Mr. Sharif’s administration still appears beleaguered, while the emergence of an increasingly assertive military led by Gen. Raheel Sharif (who is not related to the prime minister) has further eroded his authority.
    Long Live Baloch Freedom Struggle Until Victory!
    sigpic
    Long Live Baloch Freedom Struggle Until Victory!

  • #2
    80% Pakistan means millions of children and women including Balochs and Pashtuns. Why we are so callous to make lives of others miserables. What you will get from such evil practices? There are many ways to struggle for your rights.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Badlun View Post
      80% Pakistan means millions of children and women including Balochs and Pashtuns. Why we are so callous to make lives of others miserables. What you will get from such evil practices? There are many ways to struggle for your rights.
      War is war. Freedom fighters and independent people fight for independence from occupied UK made ghulams (Pakis). UK made Porkis just as USA/UK/Soviet = UN carved out Palestine from the map and give it to Israel just to inflict more damage to the Muslim world and our holy sites.
      To Paradise, with Pakhto, I will go.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Badlun View Post
        80% Pakistan means millions of children and women including Balochs and Pashtuns. Why we are so callous to make lives of others miserables. What you will get from such evil practices? There are many ways to struggle for your rights.
        And this is one of them,unfortunately Pakistan will leave you no choice but to take it the hard way. democracy in Pakistan is just elections and third degree development for those leaving in center. center do not care about rights and liberties of other provinces.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Badlun View Post
          80% Pakistan means millions of children and women including Balochs and Pashtuns. Why we are so callous to make lives of others miserables. What you will get from such evil practices? There are many ways to struggle for your rights.
          Guys, peaceful struggle and bla bla bla is very nice sounding but if you are continuously being oppressed and all options for a peaceful change have been exhausted then what options you are left with?

          And who the hell will take to violence if peaceful means work?

          Now ask your western dads and mums why weren't Syrians or for that matter Libians advised to bring the change they desired through peaceful means instead of driving them on a path of violence.

          So guys shove the west-fed peaceful struggle utopia down up you pocket until the principle of "change through peaceful struggle" is upheld by all and sundry in the world.

          Comment


          • #6
            Blowing up railways lines, power sources ,gas pipe lines, water channels , markets in a secret way is simply terrorism not legitimate war or struggle for independence. War by professional army is one thing and terrorism which mainly affect non- combatant innocent civilian people.

            If these cowards acts are perpetrated in Afghanistan or Pakistan or anywhere else must be equally condemned. Hate for Pakistan may not blind our eyes.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Badlun View Post
              Blowing up railways lines, power sources ,gas pipe lines, water channels , markets in a secret way is simply terrorism not legitimate war or struggle for independence. War by professional army is one thing and terrorism which mainly affect non- combatant innocent civilian people.

              If these cowards acts are perpetrated in Afghanistan or Pakistan or anywhere else must be equally condemned. Hate for Pakistan may not blind our eyes.
              Guys, my filthy little sum-bag friends, the rebels in Syria were not a professional Army; rather the Syrian Army was a professional army. So keep that deranged logic to that filthy rational storehouse of yours instead of spitting it here now and then.

              These scoundrels will twist any noble principles to any degree to fit their *******ized views.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Toramana View Post
                Guys, my filthy little sum-bag friends, the rebels in Syria were not a professional Army; rather the Syrian Army was a professional army. So keep that deranged logic to that filthy rational storehouse of yours instead of spitting it here now and then.

                These scoundrels will twist any noble principles to any degree to fit their *******ized views.
                Do the Syrian rebels destroy public property? Is the government of Pakistan not an elected governmet or it is run by the tyrant Asad, the son of another dictator? The one who for his power has let thousands of people to die.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Badlun View Post
                  Do the Syrian rebels destroy public property? Is the government of Pakistan not an elected governmet or it is run by the tyrant Asad, the son of another dictator? The one who for his power has let thousands of people to die.
                  Yes, they committed more heinous crimes than that only that their acts were approved by your dads from the free world - that is why you guys are barking like loyal doggies here-any one can see the twisted ignoble depraved streak in the relentless barking here that is being done for an agenda.
                  Last edited by Toramana; 01-26-2015, 11:10 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I myself approve of pacifistic struggles for all the oppressed people but don't have any soft corner for the people who like doggy dogs come here and tell you you be peaceful whereas never tell the powerful oppressors to pay attention to the rights of the oppressed. The powerful oppressor always asks the oppressed to be non-violent and to seek change through peaceful means whereas he himself cannot tolerate even peaceful struggle if it conflicts his interests and commits worst violence against the oppressed.

                    All oppressed people should first deal with these ****-bags and cockroaches who more loyal to the king than the kings himself bark even more vociferously when asked by masters to carry out their propaganda.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Live in the world of realism, social contract , real-politik and read again John Locke. I am for democratic peace , federalism but with realistic touch. I do not represent any one but my ideology of liberalism, democracy, end of the history, development, human rights but with Realism. I have explained it repeatedly that I do not need a single penny from any one. Criticize my words not my person against whom you do not have an iota of evidence paracha mama.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Badlun View Post
                        Live in the world of realism, social contract , real-politik and read again John Locke. I am for democratic peace , federalism but with realistic touch. I do not represent any one but my ideology of liberalism, democracy, end of the history, development, human rights but with Realism. I have explained it repeatedly that I do not need a single penny from any one. Criticize my words not my person against whom you do not have an iota of evidence paracha mama.
                        Now all that **** and inner filth that you carry as "humanity", "equality", "peace", bla bla bla has come out in open. Now there no such pacifistic principle "turn out the other cheek" when something has offended you and you have resorted yourself to violence? Where is the realism now? Why should be Baluch exception to what your low-self cannot uphold? Why hold Baluch to such high moral standard?

                        And whatever **** come in your mind whether "paracha or not paracha" I damn care until I have a high moral ground and the right thing to say.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          These guys will bark at the highest pitch if their master-dads declared the Baluch struggle to be a just struggle. Look at East Taimur massacred by Soharto with full approval of the free world but as soon as the threat of the communism was gone then the struggle of East Taimur became just and the cronies more than their dads started barking at the highest pitch about the plight of East Taimurians.

                          Comment


                          • #15
                            Internationally, the killings and purges were seen as a victory over Communism at the height of the Cold War. Western governments and much of the West's media preferred Suharto and the "New Order" to the PKI and the increasingly leftist "Old Order".[68] A headline in US News and World Report read: "Indonesia: Hope... where there was once none".[69] Australian Prime Minister Harold Holt commented in The New York Times, "With 500,000 to 1 million Communist sympathizers knocked off, I think it is safe to assume a reorientation has taken place."[70] Time magazine described the suppression of the PKI as "The West's best news for years in Asia."[71] In recalling the attitudes of US government officials regarding the killings, State Department intelligence officer Howard Federspiel said that "no one cared, as long as they were Communists, that they were being butchered."[72] Within the United States, Robert F. Kennedy was one of the only prominent individuals to condemn the massacres. In January 1966 he said: "We have spoken out against the inhuman slaughters perpetrated by the Nazis and the Communists. But will we speak out also against the inhuman slaughter in Indonesia, where over 100,000 alleged Communists have not been perpetrators, but victims?"[73]

                            The Communist states, by contrast, issued strong criticism of the killings. The Chinese government stated they were "heinous and diabolical crimes . . . unprecedented in history."[73] One Yugoslav diplomat commented that "even assuming the guilt of the politburo [PKI leadership], which I do not, does this justify genocide? Kill the Central Committee, but do not kill 100,000 people who do not know and had no part in it [the 30 September Plot]."[73] The Suharto government was condemned as a "military fascist regime" by the government of North Korea.[73]

                            According to Kathy Kadane, members of the US government provided targeted names to the Indonesian Army,[74] which several US officials have denied.[75] Internal memos reported an Indonesian request for "communications equipment and small arms to arm Moslem and nationalist youths in Central Java for use against the PKI", which the State Department refused.[76] H.W. Brands wrote that the Johnson administration expressly refused to supply weapons for the mass killing of Indonesian communists.[77] According to Robert Cribb, there is no evidence that the United States significantly increased the scale of the killings.[78]

                            However, Mark Aarons argues that declassified intelligence reports indicate that "the CIA actually compiled detailed lists of those it deemed dangerous and supplied them to Suharto's forces who ensured those so named were eliminated in the mass killing operations."[1] Alex Bellamy concurs, noting the Indonesian army used a list containing some 5,000 names of suspected PKI members, which was provided to them by the U.S. embassy in Jakarta, to identify some victims.[79] Bradley Simpson, Director of the Indonesia/East Timor Documentation Project at the National Security Archive, claims that "the United States was directly involved to the extent that they provided the Indonesian Armed Forces with assistance that they introduced to help facilitate the mass killings," which included the CIA providing small arms from Thailand, and the US government providing monetary assistance and limited amounts of communications equipment, medicine and a range of other items, including shoes and uniforms, to the Indonesian military.[80][81] In a 2008 program on the killings presented by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Bradley Simpson states:

                            “ These documents have enabled to gain a much clearer understanding of the precise role of the United States, Britain, Australia and other western governments in both attempting to provoke an armed takeover of Indonesia in 1965 and in supporting the mass killings by the army and civilian groups which followed the September 30 movement. Prior to the last few years scholars have largely speculated on the role of the American Central Intelligence Agency and other western intelligence agencies in pursuing covert operations aimed at provoking an armed conflict between the Indonesian army and the Indonesian communist party or the PKI. But these declassified documents lay out a picture of active engagement with one of the great atrocities of the 20th century, and make the United States and other western governments de facto accomplices in this campaign of mass murder that stretched through the end of 1965 and into 1966.[82]

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X