What has history taught those who aligned with amreeka

[torkham]

http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/history/item/4690-iran-and-the-shah-what-really-happened

Early 70s the Shah of Iran was aligned with Americans in his pro-western attitude whilst sitting on a hefty load of black gold - crude that is.
He nationalised, industrialised and constructed, irrigated, land "distributed" and "high cultured" Iran. That very success (and spoil to the victor with bigger cut of the pie for his constitutional monarchy) led to the rapprochement by his western supposed allies. Through the use of media and homegrown weeds like the Ayatollah (of Indian Parsee origins) and communists (Tudeh), a powerful manipulation was hatched by the Council on Foreign Relations, instigating a revolution with subsequent demise of the said Shah.

What this article sheds light on is firstly, how the political Iran got in such mess with the very people their Shah looked upto, secondly, how Mossadegh and operation AJAX had been a minor distraction in a deeper, more sinister under current, and thirdly, how Kissinger, the Bilderberg and CFR worked and surely continue to working like a ghost organisation moulding the world order.

Again, this article is about the political iran as opposed to Shiite nuke state that is a threat to KSA and khaleeji Arabs.

It's relevant now as BSA has been signed with $o much optimi$m by such a bright academic, our walas mashar doctor saeb, and supported by many of the ruling and wanna be ruling pack.
What happened to "dolce et decorum est pro patria mori"?

[asad71]

The lesson of history is that no body learns from history. With time the American character has become more evil.

[Khostai]

And what about Japan and Germanny after WW2??? They don't look that bad. The Shah of Iran turned against Israel and he became more and more alianated from the west, like Karzai in the last months, thats why he was trown out. Thats just how it goes.

[Badlun]

And what about Japan and Germanny after WW2??? They don't look that bad. The Shah of Iran turned against Israel and he became more and more alianated from the west, like Karzai in the last months, thats why he was trown out. Thats just how it goes.

Khostai You have hit the nail. Why West works fine with US but not the so called Muslim world. Priorities of the Muslim world are different. We talk of Hereafter more than this world. We talk of abstract things and ignore this material world.

What revolution of Iran has given to Iran? Sanctions, economic backwardness and rule of Mullah. I have been to Iran. Its a great country with great people but Mullahs are destroying it. Mullah with foreign Arab ideology is as foreigner as US. US at least does not impose theocracy but talk of democracy, human rights, modern education and development.

[Khostai]

Khostai You have hit the nail. Why West works fine with US but not the so called Muslim world. Priorities of the Muslim world are different. We talk of Hereafter more than this world. We talk of abstract things and ignore this material world.

What revolution of Iran has given to Iran? Sanctions, economic backwardness and rule of Mullah. I have been to Iran. Its a great country with great people but Mullahs are destroying it. Mullah with foreign Arab ideology is as foreigner as US. US at least does not impose theocracy but talk of democracy, human rights, modern education and development.

Yes talk, like the muslims talk about shariah and true Islam but instead are just power hungry pigs that abuse people for their own interest.

[Badlun]

Yes talk, like the muslims talk about shariah and true Islam but instead are just power hungry pigs that abuse people for their own interest.

Yes. Its a paradox that Islamists talk of God, Hereafter, Sharia etc but always use religion for power. This is a clear paradox. Sufi Islam is different. Here the focus is on spirituality. Not power and material world.