New governor of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa cannot speak Pashto

[Bost Bastan News]

I don't use facebook.


My point is this. I am not a racist person.

The reason I like Pashtuns or Pathan is because of one simple reason. They stick to their principles.

The main reason I have love for Pathans is because they as a group, have the same religious values that my family share.

Other people in Pakistan, Arabs states, Iran or Afghanistan do not share the same religious values that we have.


I am Punjabi, but Pashtuns behave the same way that I have been brought up with, and that's why I have so much respect for them and can relate to them.

Thank you for your nice words but you just need to stop with this Panjabism (hypocrisy). Panjab is sinking in alcoholism, domestic violence, prostitution and many more. Don´t judge people you don´t know. Many people in internet are not the same persons they are in real.

[Pakwatan]

Thank you for your nice words but you just need to stop with this Panjabism (hypocrisy). Panjab is sinking in alcoholism, domestic violence, prostitution and many more. Don´t judge people you don´t know. Many people in internet are not the same persons they are in real.

I understand this. And I am not speaking for all Punjabis. Just for my family and myself.

Can you deny that Pashuns don't drink alcohol and run ***** houses?

There are the bad seeds in every people.

The problem I have with people on this forum is that they try to stigmatize people in certain groups, which is not only ignorant, but unjust.

[Khostai]

Why are Pashtuns so against this, you are a minority in Pakistan, you love Pakistan and don't want to be seperated, ofcourse this kind of things will happen. Being against punjabis as a governor but still not wanting to form your own country is just stupid,
You have two options.

1. Split up and form your own country, so this kind of things will not happen.
2. Or just accept this and deal with it, becuase now you all sound like bunch of retarded racists.....

[Since1947]

Drama queens much eh? We do get it now, Punjabization and Punjabi people are the biggest threat ever, and oppressed Pashtun are suffering immensely under Punjabi tyranny. Let's forget Nawaz Sharif is an ethnic Kashmiri and Imran Khan an ethnic Pashtun. This 'Punjabism' must be quite contagious. Lmao.

Fine, let's blame the Punjabizzzzzz! Bilawal Bhutto can't speak (decent) Urdu or Sindhi at all, yet he is the Chairman of PPP and he will be running in 2018. Everything is possible in Pakistan. But yeah whatever, bloody Punjabizzzzzz everywhere!

[Bengal_Tiger]

you can,nt ignore ANP ,s relation with pml-n in the past.
Wali khan called nawaz sharif the leader and sheri-punjab.
Mr Hidayatullah Chamkani of ANP was the speaker of Abasi,s govt in the 90s.ANP was an allaince with pml-n and people like fareed tofan and others serve under his govt.
That time ANP did,nt oppose his position cus nawaz was their leader.This time ANP is out of power with no stake in the govt.
He was khindko speaking then and now.The difference this time is that nawaz can,nt offer anything to ANP oppertunists this time.
Ex-isi chief Major Amir was offered the post but he refused.
ANP ,s freind is back in the business and they should congratulate him.

All of the above pashtuns are cool blood nation and they will tolerate him like they did in the past.Amir Gulistan Ganjowa was punjabi and he served on the same position.
Some ANP leaders like Afrasyab khatak has family relation with hard liner punjabi party pml-q.His daughter is married to the son of punjabi mushahid husain.
Azam hoti and Bilour family also enjoy good family relation with punjab league leaders.

1. The ANP are a political party. Their duty is to serve the people or in this case, their people i.e. Pashtuns.

They are servants of the Pashtun nation, if they fail to serve Pashtuns and protect their interests they should be criticized.

2. Though many in Pakhtunkhwa are critical of the alleged corruption of the ANP elite, at the same time on the ground level the ANP is a vehicle for ordinary Pashtuns to connect more with their culture and identity and promote their interests.

3. If parties like the Qawmi Watan Party or whoever can serve Pashtuns better and are more effective in defending the interests of Pashtuns they should be respected, followed etc.


4. This issue is bigger than parties such as the ANP, QWP, PMAP let's look beyond that and look at the interests of Pashtuns in Pakhtunkhwa.

Should a man who cannot even speak the language of tribals be made a governor over them?

YES/NO

I think it would be far more effective if someone who can understand the language of a people in a war-torn and highly sensitive area is governor.

Internet fora like this one are useful in highlighting the concerns of Pashtun citizens about their rights and region and along with other social media act as forms of pressure on the Pakistani authorities to address the grievances of Pashtuns.

[HalloIsBack]

Have you visited Vodkazais facebook account?

https://www.facebook.com/alexander.vodkazai?fref=ts

?
if not give the right link

[Yousafzai Pakhtun]

you can,nt ignore ANP ,s relation with pml-n in the past.
Wali khan called nawaz sharif the leader and sheri-punjab.
Mr Hidayatullah Chamkani of ANP was the speaker of Abasi,s govt in the 90s.ANP was an allaince with pml-n and people like fareed tofan and others serve under his govt.
That time ANP did,nt oppose his position cus nawaz was their leader.This time ANP is out of power with no stake in the govt.
He was khindko speaking then and now.The difference this time is that nawaz can,nt offer anything to ANP oppertunists this time.
Ex-isi chief Major Amir was offered the post but he refused.
ANP ,s freind is back in the business and they should congratulate him.

All of the above pashtuns are cool blood nation and they will tolerate him like they did in the past.Amir Gulistan Ganjowa was punjabi and he served on the same position.
Some ANP leaders like Afrasyab khatak has family relation with hard liner punjabi party pml-q.His daughter is married to the son of punjabi mushahid husain.
Azam hoti and Bilour family also enjoy good family relation with punjab league leaders.

You are just mad at ANP without keeping in view the political history of the region. A coalition government is formed when none of the parties who contest the elections get clear majority in the province. ANP being a prominent party of the province many times emerged as main stake holder. You may also know that according to the constitution a party may need 2/3 majority to amend or regulate a bill and for that reason political parties make alliances. In a country like Pakistan and India the bigger parties always try to ally the smaller ones to run the governments smoothly and without any fear. in 1970 ANP under Abdul Wali Khan had to make alliance with JUI of Mufti Mehmood in Pakhtunkhwa and Balouchistan bcause both the parties were struggling against Punjabi Establishment at that time. In 1997 PML emerged as second party besides ANP, and ANP entered into coalition with PML after NAWAZ agreed to some of their demands (main demand was renaming of province) but later when Nawaz backed out of his promise ANP had to quit the government. Similarly in 2008 elections they had to give hands to Zardari's PPP after Zardari agreed to their 5 points agenda and he kept his promise and both the parties run the government together.
In short making political alliances is one thing and accepting one's manifesto is another. ANP may have allied with other parties for the national interests but they never compromised on their principles.
As far as his CMship is concerned he was then the elected representative but in this case he isn't elected by the people of FATA or their representatives but the PM and his party has choosed him to govern the Pashtun populating territory which is unjust.
Secondly in Politics blood relationships doesn't matter. We have seen brothers contesting for the same constituency. Afrasiab or Bilour etc may have relations with Punjabis but that doesn't mean they would accept other parties manifesto and if they did so i shall be the first to criticise.
Thirdly ANP have no enemity with Punjabis or any other ethnic groups. It is a political party only struggling for the rights of Pakhtuns against the oppressors and those exploiting their resources whether it were the British, the Punjabis or the Muhajirs. Marrying in Punjabis, or any other people is one's private issue and party have nothing to do with it.

[gadoonwal]

You are just mad at ANP without keeping in view the political history of the region. A coalition government is formed when none of the parties who contest the elections get clear majority in the province. ANP being a prominent party of the province many times emerged as main stake holder. You may also know that according to the constitution a party may need 2/3 majority to amend or regulate a bill and for that reason political parties make alliances. In a country like Pakistan and India the bigger parties always try to ally the smaller ones to run the governments smoothly and without any fear. in 1970 ANP under Abdul Wali Khan had to make alliance with JUI of Mufti Mehmood in Pakhtunkhwa and Balouchistan bcause both the parties were struggling against Punjabi Establishment at that time. In 1997 PML emerged as second party besides ANP, and ANP entered into coalition with PML after NAWAZ agreed to some of their demands (main demand was renaming of province) but later when Nawaz backed out of his promise ANP had to quit the government. Similarly in 2008 elections they had to give hands to Zardari's PPP after Zardari agreed to their 5 points agenda and he kept his promise and both the parties run the government together.
In short making political alliances is one thing and accepting one's manifesto is another. ANP may have allied with other parties for the national interests but they never compromised on their principles.
As far as his CMship is concerned he was then the elected representative but in this case he isn't elected by the people of FATA or their representatives but the PM and his party has choosed him to govern the Pashtun populating territory which is unjust.
Secondly in Politics blood relationships doesn't matter. We have seen brothers contesting for the same constituency. Afrasiab or Bilour etc may have relations with Punjabis but that doesn't mean they would accept other parties manifesto and if they did so i shall be the first to criticise.
Thirdly ANP have no enemity with Punjabis or any other ethnic groups. It is a political party only struggling for the rights of Pakhtuns against the oppressors and those exploiting their resources whether it were the British, the Punjabis or the Muhajirs. Marrying in Punjabis, or any other people is one's private issue and party have nothing to do with it.

The question is still the same,,,,,,abbasi was khindko speaking then and now so why zahid and his leaders never oppose his nomination?
He was elected that time right but he was still khinko speaking.
The answer is very simple that ANP leaders need some jobs from their masters in punjab .
Dr khan sahib ,s daughter was married to Sikh,did you know that?.


Marrying a son of punjabi nationalist party and then claiming to be the leader of pashtun is a joke.
On one side the ANp oppertunists blaming punjabis and parties like pml-q on the other side the same leaders giving their daughters to the anti-pashtun party leader of pml-q.
The ANP leaders i have seen with my own eyes abused pml in their rallies.
behind the door they are the loyal servants of punjabi establishment.

ANP ,s brave leader escape to punjab for safety and was living underground.

The Bilour family,s RELATION with Gohar ayub and nawaz is well known.
If you think wali khan was the leader of pashtuns and anp then spare some time and read his book where he clearly written,,that afrasyab khatak,afzal khan and latif are working for ,,isi,,,
That book is available in the library and also in univesty book agency pekhawar.
ISI and US brought ANP into power in pashtunkhwa and afrasyab was installed by isi for the leadership role.
Asafandyar,azam,afrasyab and zahid khan etc are on the payroll of isi.
Zahid khan lives very close to GHQ .
He also have family relation with Babar Ghori of MQM.
In karachi ANP making money on the blood of pashtuns .
They never defedned pashtuns and their soils.
In that difficult time the entire anp leadership escaped to punjab.
One of the most corrupt and lier MNA perwaiz adovcate build up five star hotel on mari road rawalpindi.This is the money of poor pashtuns.He now permanantly moved to punjab.
ANP in her five years term did corruption only.
Asafand owned plazas in malaysia and his son playing in millions in DUBAI with another thief shahi syed ,s son.
Where this money came from?

ANP is past and will never come to power.
Nasim wali khan already exposed them.
About the ANP wokers,i always admire them but they were sold and used by their leaders.
The Britishes brought this non-violence idealogy to pashtun land to stop the rise of pashtuns against their rule.
Ghani khan was the only sincere person in wali family.
He begged bacha khan to support pakeer ipi,s arm movment for azad pashtnistan .Bacha khan rejected his idea and Ghani khan quit politics.
Later wali khan shown some courage but it was to late and he was sarounded by isi agents.Finally he has no choice but to form an allaince with nawaz and even that did,nt work.He also quit politics.

[Yousafzai Pakhtun]

The question is still the same,,,,,,abbasi was khindko speaking then and now so why zahid and his leaders never oppose his nomination?
He was elected that time right but he was still khinko speaking.
The answer is very simple that ANP leaders need some jobs from their masters in punjab .
Dr khan sahib ,s daughter was married to Sikh,did you know that?.


Marrying a son of punjabi nationalist party and then claiming to be the leader of pashtun is a joke.
On one side the ANp oppertunists blaming punjabis and parties like pml-q on the other side the same leaders giving their daughters to the anti-pashtun party leader of pml-q.
The ANP leaders i have seen with my own eyes abused pml in their rallies.
behind the door they are the loyal servants of punjabi establishment.

ANP ,s brave leader escape to punjab for safety and was living underground.

The Bilour family,s RELATION with Gohar ayub and nawaz is well known.
If you think wali khan was the leader of pashtuns and anp then spare some time and read his book where he clearly written,,that afrasyab khatak,afzal khan and latif are working for ,,isi,,,
That book is available in the library and also in univesty book agency pekhawar.
ISI and US brought ANP into power in pashtunkhwa and afrasyab was installed by isi for the leadership role.
Asafandyar,azam,afrasyab and zahid khan etc are on the payroll of isi.
Zahid khan lives very close to GHQ .
He also have family relation with Babar Ghori of MQM.
In karachi ANP making money on the blood of pashtuns .
They never defedned pashtuns and their soils.
In that difficult time the entire anp leadership escaped to punjab.
One of the most corrupt and lier MNA perwaiz adovcate build up five star hotel on mari road rawalpindi.This is the money of poor pashtuns.He now permanantly moved to punjab.
ANP in her five years term did corruption only.
Asafand owned plazas in malaysia and his son playing in millions in DUBAI with another thief shahi syed ,s son.
Where this money came from?

ANP is past and will never come to power.
Nasim wali khan already exposed them.
About the ANP wokers,i always admire them but they were sold and used by their leaders.
The Britishes brought this non-violence idealogy to pashtun land to stop the rise of pashtuns against their rule.
Ghani khan was the only sincere person in wali family.
He begged bacha khan to support pakeer ipi,s arm movment for azad pashtnistan .Bacha khan rejected his idea and Ghani khan quit politics.
Later wali khan shown some courage but it was to late and he was sarounded by isi agents.Finally he has no choice but to form an allaince with nawaz and even that did,nt work.He also quit politics.

Lolz.....your above lines shows how much do you believe in Punjabi Propaganda yourself. You are criticizing Bacha Khan for his non-violence doctrine saying it was the british ideology thus blaming the Great pashtun leader to be a British tool? and yea tell me at the end of the day, was it the armed struggle of Faqeer Ipi, Haji Sahib Turangzai, Bhagat Singh, Subhash Chander bose and their like minded people who compelled the british to leave India or it were Bacha Khan, Ghandi, Nehru, Abdul Samad Khan, Mr. Jinnah or their likes who did it?
I do not argue and talk with those who criticize Bacha khan. He shouldn't be a pashtun who raise finger at Bacha Khan. It seems you have some personal issues with ANP, you can criticize their policies and the current leadership but you shouldn't criticize Bacha Khan and Wali khan because people like them are born once. Even foreigners and non pashtuns are their admirers and it is such a shame that a person who call himself a pashtun talk rubbish about them. For me You and the muslim leaguers like Qayum Khan are the same. don't quote me anymore

[gadoonwal]

Lolz.....your above lines shows how much do you believe in Punjabi Propaganda yourself. You are criticizing Bacha Khan for his non-violence doctrine saying it was the british ideology thus blaming the Great pashtun leader to be a British tool? and yea tell me at the end of the day, was it the armed struggle of Faqeer Ipi, Haji Sahib Turangzai, Bhagat Singh, Subhash Chander bose and their like minded people who compelled the british to leave India or it were Bacha Khan, Ghandi, Nehru, Abdul Samad Khan, Mr. Jinnah or their likes who did it?
I do not argue and talk with those who criticize Bacha khan. He shouldn't be a pashtun who raise finger at Bacha Khan. It seems you have some personal issues with ANP, you can criticize their policies and the current leadership but you shouldn't criticize Bacha Khan and Wali khan because people like them are born once. Even foreigners and non pashtuns are their admirers and it is such a shame that a person who call himself a pashtun talk rubbish about them. For me You and the muslim leaguers like Qayum Khan are the same. don't quote me anymore

you qoute me so i responf to you.I do,nt even waste my time on ,,anp,,like party.

I know many pashtuns were rewarded by ANP in their five years term .Now the oppertunists will always support their leader and party.
I supported ANP in the past but since they join hands with punjabis i am no longer part of this.

Now back to your questions kindly prove me wrong and do,nt lable pashtun or none-pashtun.
I can say whoever support ANP is not true pashtun cus ANP back stabed pashtuns and working for Jinah,s pakistan.
ANP is taking you more closer to lahore then JALAL ABAD.iT IS FACT.
Bacha khan baba i respect the most for his great work for pashtuns.
He build up schools and many other good things he did for pashtuns but he was not a good politicain.
He was a confused man.He was used by Ghandi and later on the assebmly floor in pakistan he called pakistan his home and pledge his loyality to pakistan.
He was working for the rights of minorities and pashtuns after Jinah created pakistan.
He was put into jail for years and years.
He had no clear agenda or goal.
He call pakistan home.
He also supported the pashtunistan issue.
He was also supporting the unity of lar aw bar afghan and decided to be burried in afghanistan.
Now tell me what he wanted then?
Same with wali khan.
I have seen him with my own eyes saying lar aw bar yaw afghan ghwaro and the same time he pledge his loyality to pakistan.
He was good freind of zahoor elahi.
He also said pashtun and pakistan can not be separated.
If YOU DO,NT KNOW ASK YOUR LEADERS IS THIS NOT TRUE.
At the same time they made fool of bar afghan.

Ofcourse the none-violent was the british game.Bacha khan was not british agent but he fall into their game.
Finally jinah created pakistan and the same bacha khan called jinah,s pakistan his home.
You have very limited knowlegde of ANP ,s past.
You can confirm why ghani khan quit poltics?


i reject jinah,s pakistan and the sametime i reject punjab,s servants ANP.
Azam hoti fully exposed asnfandyar and khatak.
Now tell us why naseem wali khan formed new party against punjabi khan?
So everyone is lier except ANP spokesman on pashtunforum.


Today,s ANP remind us kashmiray qayum khan.
kashmeray qayum khan was the enemy of pashtuns .WALI KHAN opposed him but today his own son is working for punjab.
His grandson hoti is worshiping pakistan.
da punjab taalisati ba sa pakhtu wagati.

death to pakistan

death to its lover

[Yousafzai Pakhtun]

You just uttered rubbish like your Chief Aftab Sherpao. Only accusations and perceptions! your statements should be more authentic and accusations must be supported with solid proofs for me to reply. Otherwise will be ignored like i ignore every other blind & ignorant propagandist.

[gadoonwal]

You just uttered rubbish like your Chief Aftab Sherpao. Only accusations and perceptions! your statements should be more authentic and accusations must be supported with solid proofs for me to reply. Otherwise will be ignored like i ignore every other blind & ignorant propagandist.

OK man,
i know truth hurt.I know you can not answer what i asked?
I was never interested to discuss ANP politics with you but you ask some questions and i respond.
I will IGNORE you too cus you are mind set and following one sided politics and propaganda.
However i will expose every party and leaders supporting punjabi agenda .
This is my right to do so.You can not stop me by exposing ANP.
BUT I WILL NOT QOUTE YOU AND PLS DO THE SAME.
pa makha de kha

[Smarty]

Lolz.....your above lines shows how much do you believe in Punjabi Propaganda yourself. You are criticizing Bacha Khan for his non-violence doctrine saying it was the british ideology thus blaming the Great pashtun leader to be a British tool? and yea tell me at the end of the day, was it the armed struggle of Faqeer Ipi, Haji Sahib Turangzai, Bhagat Singh, Subhash Chander bose and their like minded people who compelled the british to leave India or it were Bacha Khan, Ghandi, Nehru, Abdul Samad Khan, Mr. Jinnah or their likes who did it?
I do not argue and talk with those who criticize Bacha khan. He shouldn't be a pashtun who raise finger at Bacha Khan. It seems you have some personal issues with ANP, you can criticize their policies and the current leadership but you shouldn't criticize Bacha Khan and Wali khan because people like them are born once. Even foreigners and non pashtuns are their admirers and it is such a shame that a person who call himself a pashtun talk rubbish about them. For me You and the muslim leaguers like Qayum Khan are the same. don't quote me anymore

Bacha khan failed, Jinnah succeeded. Bacha khan was too busy attending affairs of hindu Congress, he forgot that pakhtunkhwa has nothing to do with hindostan and this whole time he should have focused on scheming with afghanistan in liberating pakhtunistan. By non-violence movement he wanted to make pakhtuns pusies?, the martial culture of pakhtuns could be organized and managed and channeled for higher purpose. Why nations keep armies?.
Jinnah was true winner, he got pakistan out of nowhere.

[Yousafzai Pakhtun]

Bacha khan failed, Jinnah succeeded. Bacha khan was too busy attending affairs of hindu Congress, he forgot that pakhtunkhwa has nothing to do with hindostan and this whole time he should have focused on scheming with afghanistan in liberating pakhtunistan. By non-violence movement he wanted to make pakhtuns pusies?, the martial culture of pakhtuns could be organized and managed and channeled for higher purpose. Why nations keep armies?.
Jinnah was true winner, he got pakistan out of nowhere.

Did Jinnah and Muslim League had an army? did their struggle was an armed struggle? Yes it can be said that Jinnah Succeeded apparently, but did his Two nation theory survived? no it resulted in further division in 1971. Actually his masters i.e British wanted the division of India and they ignored the demands of Mr. Gandhi and Bacha Khan. Everything was planned from London.
Bacha khan and his Khudai Khidmatgars joined hands with Congress the main stream party of Hindustan so that to put forth their demands in a more effective way. They had the one and simple motive in mind i.e liberation of Hindustan from British in which they succeeded. They didn't wanted to achieve their goals through illegal ways and through force and armed struggle. He bycotted the referendum in a most social and civilized manner He and his men didn't wanted to practice those ways against which they preached for the last 20 years. And yes if afghan Government wanted they could have acceded it to afghanistan like India did in case of Hyderabad, Jodhpur and Kashmir but ironically they remained silent and now everybody is blaming Bacha Khan.

[Smarty]

Did Jinnah and Muslim League had an army? did their struggle was an armed struggle? Yes it can be said that Jinnah Succeeded apparently, but did his Two nation theory survived? no it resulted in further division in 1971. Actually his masters i.e British wanted the division of India and they ignored the demands of Mr. Gandhi and Bacha Khan. Everything was planned from London.
Bacha khan and his Khudai Khidmatgars joined hands with Congress the main stream party of Hindustan so that to put forth their demands in a more effective way. They had the one and simple motive in mind i.e liberation of Hindustan from British in which they succeeded. They didn't wanted to achieve their goals through illegal ways and through force and armed struggle. He bycotted the referendum in a most social and civilized manner He and his men didn't wanted to practice those ways against which they preached for the last 20 years. And yes if afghan Government wanted they could have acceded it to afghanistan like India did in case of Hyderabad, Jodhpur and Kashmir but ironically they remained silent and now everybody is blaming Bacha Khan.

I am not concerned with jinnah and gandhi, they were hindustanis . Jinnah had nothing to lose if his wish was not granted by his british lords, he was born hindostani and could live as one.
But its strange to see "fakhr-e-afghan" doing politics as a hindostani. I can understand him as social reformer but his party contesting in elections as partners of indian congress is beyond me. Why he was struggling for liberation of hindostan? he was supposed to struggle for liberation of pakhtuns. Congress also made promises with sikhs and you know what happened to them. If partition had not happened, there was no way congress was giving away NWFP. So bacha khan, in my opinion, was an average leader of limited influence, he was rather more of a social reformer and philospher. You lead your nation like ataturk, you have to fight wars when the situation demands. I know hundreds of Pusies die at babra without lifting a finger at pakis.