TTP only want to get out of US war, not impose sharia by force: Imran Khan

[DaZahroJaam.]

^ since you are such a grand advocate and fan of sharia, would you kindly explain to us as to what their views and reactions towards your constant impulsion of explicitly discussing pornography in a public platform might possibly be??
i have this very odd theory that the likes of you would be hanged in the first 30 seconds if such a law was permitted to come in to power.

[Shah-i-Kot]

Imran for phased military pullout from tribal areas

22:34 Mar 27, 2014 Pakistan



ISLAMABAD: Calling for a phased military pullout from tribal areas, Chairman Pakistan Tehrek-Insaf (PTI), Imran Khan, Thursday said the way to peace could never be paved with war.
Speaking his mind at Samaa TV’s most happening talk-show ‘Nadeem Malik Live’, Khan said, none of the 6,000 operations the tribal areas had seen so far ended in peace.
“War begets war. Peace begets peace. It’s that simple”, PTI chief added.
He showered kudos on Prime Minister Mian Nawaz Sharif and Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar for all the troubles they had to go through to get Taliban peace talks going.
Nevertheless, in the same breath he warned the government against trading ‘war for ‘aid’, a mistake which many a previous regime made.
“I am afraid they may not make the same mistake again for $1.5 billion”, Khan said.
Imran Khan said at least now we could tell the peace-wishers from the war-wagers.
“All the major tribes are in the favour of peace, which can only be made through negotiation”, said he.
He said the main thing was a ceasefire, that’s it.



http://www.samaa.tv/pakistan/27-Mar-...m-tribal-areas

[RevolutionThroughReason]

^ since you are such a grand advocate and fan of sharia, would you kindly explain to us as to what their views and reactions towards your constant impulsion of explicitly discussing pornography in a public platform might possibly be??
i have this very odd theory that the likes of you would be hanged in the first 30 seconds if such a law was permitted to come in to power.

Discussing something and promoting/encouraging something are two very different things.

Women used to go to the Prophet MUhammad(saw) and ask him about sexual positions.

Imam Ahmad recorded that `Abdullah bin Sabit said: I went to Hafsah bint `Abdur-Rahman bin Abu Bakr and said, "I wish to ask you about something, but I am shy.'' She said, "Do not be shy, O my nephew.'' He said, "About having sex from behind with women.'' She said, "Umm Salamah told me that the Ansar used to refrain from having sex from behind (in the vagina). The Jews claimed that those who have sex with their women from behind would have offspring with crossed-eyes. When the Muhajirun came to Al-Madinah, they married Ansar women and had sex with them from behind. One of these women would not obey her husband and said, `You will not do that until I go to Allah's Messenger (and ask him about this matter). ' She went to Umm Salamah and told her the story. Umm Salamah said, `Wait until Allah's Messenger comes.' When Allah's Messenger came, the Ansari woman was shy to ask him about this matter, so she left. Umm Salamah told Allah's Messenger the story and he said: (Summon the Ansari woman.)'' She was summoned and he recited this Ayah to her: ( Your wives are a tilth for you, so go to your tilth, when or how you will.) He added: (Only in one valve (the vagina))''

So a lot of your understanding about Islam and what constitutes "pornography" are incorrect and based more on the ignorance, shallowness and backwardness regarding the culture you were raised in than anything that is actually apart of the Shari'ah

So a person in Shari'ah clearly would NOT be hanged for merely talking about a sexually related matter, unless they were trying to encourage fornication or adultery.

Which reinforces my statement the Taliban nor idiotic Afghan cultural norms represent Islam

Hope that clarifies things.

[DaZahroJaam.]

I am going to comment only on the first two sentences since that I all I read.

First of all, that has nothing to do with anything and neither is the subject of sharia limited to sexual matters the way you always turn the topic and make it seem to be. Secondly, if what you claim is true and it did actually happen, I sure that they didn't gather the villagers and then brought the subject up in front of everyone. If they did, it was probably in confidence and for genuine matters.
This is pashtun forums, not sex education forums. Pashtuns have the decency and understanding of telling the difference between when a subject should r should not be brought up. You obviously fall short on that matter..
You can have all the knowledge in the world but if you don't have the wisdom of utilizing it properly, you are no different that the rest of the morons in your lead. And in future, spare yourself from the trouble of going through the process of typing all that nonsense. Neither I not anyone else in this forum is or will be depending on you to educate us on the details of such matters.
Thank you kindly and good day.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

And neither do I, this is a forum, where people have the option not to read/to read the post or posts.

Clearly your avoidance of everything but the first two sentences (even though you clearly did read them) is because blathering on like a total ignoramus is more convenient for you by pretending a sound and relevant response wasn't given.

Whatever the case you challenged me based on the Shari'ah, not Pashtun culture. YOUR understanding of Shari'ah however is based on Pashtun culture, which is why it is errant. Don't try to portray ignorance as Wisdom. Pashtuns don't have this bizarre hyper sensitivity because they have decency, it has to do with insecurity and guilty conscious their inability to demonstrate real self control when the slightest mention of sex is involved. Isn't it any wonder that in SAME Pashtun culture selling a daughter is seen as acceptable and pederasty is deemed a pastime.

You described allusions to sex/sexuality as pornography while pornography has a very specific definition for a specific motive. Your Phony Backwards, Developmentally challenged portrayal of "wisdom" is really just histrionics. Your narrative is as bogus as your sense of morality. Please save your pleas of ignorant wisdom for a more appropriate audience, like people with an extra chromosome.

[DaZahroJaam.]

So you are going to exploit and emotionally abuse our users of all ages may that be 14 or 65 because apparently, some Pashtuns sell their daughters?? And here we were, giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming that every Yemeni man isn't a child molesting paedophile.
I had a burger to eat, 20 miles to speed through and that respond to write. All within the time frame of twenty minutes. I chose to read the first two sentences because I didn't care for the rest of the garbage you wrote because it was predictable as **** and not because it was inconvenient to the respond I had for you.
I accused you of taking every opportunity to indulge in binging up such topics and a natural and decent way of proving me wrong would have been simply not doing what I had accused you of.
If I don't care for life much, this would be the point where I would stab myself in the eye with a fork. Spare me.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

Oh nice emotional blackmail tactic there, no I a saying this fraudulent personification of the moral virtues of Pashtuns evaporates when you look t the flipside of Pashtun culture. Yes Pashtuns have a certain grievance with sexuality, but there seems to be an unusual coincidence that said culture allows such things as daughter selling and pederasty with impunity.

You can make up any excuse you want but if you didn't want to read what I had to say you wouldn't have confronted me; so you thought you'd wouldn't end up the underdog with this but when I respond back with something cogent it diminishes your pre-rehearsed rant, so the inconvenience angle seems to hold.

The way to prove someone like you wrong i by ripping apart the very notions or that you root your false indignance, to conform to your worldview would imply it is correct, which it isn't.

please proceed to stab yourself with said fork, repeatedly until your pulse starts to fade.

[DaZahroJaam.]

it's their respect for the delicacy of such matters which accounts for what is known amongst them as nang and ghairat. the amount of importance deemed necessary while instilling such values in you reflects on the legitimacy of the blood you claim to have running in your veins.
it's a tiny aspect of their tradition that is wrong which can be fixed very easily. the very foundation of your principles and morals lays on ****ty grounds. you can not be fixed.
don't bring such subjects to the table when it's unnecessary and uncalled for or you can kiss your professional career good bye.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

Now you're cowering down and changing goal posts to the delicacy angle, well I didn't realize how much of fragile flower you were. It is interesting that you believe forcing girls is a "small" problem even though most marriages among Pashtuns is not by their consent. and the estimates for child abuse in Afghanistan are alarming. Yet somehow this doesn't reflect on their "Nang" and "Ghairat" or their legitimacy of their blood. This must be something that you tell yourself to feel more at ease with your lunacy

[Khostai]

ooo somebody needs to be banned again LOL

[gadoonwal]

Talibans leaders are talking to taliban leaders mean a new strategy to give more freedom to ,,isi,,gangsters to operate freely.
Pakistan,s boys are preparing for new game in the region.

[Khostai]

Can't somebody invent a virus that infects those talib monkyes and there supportes, so we could finaly get rid of these deseas that infest our regions like the black plague -_-.....