Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pashtun Mullah

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pashtun Mullah

    Just watch a video of Punjshiri Mullah’s anti-pashtun verbal masturbation which to my surprise was received with cheer of “Takbeer Allah of Abar” of Punjshiri. Not that I don’t know the dilapidated condition – both morally and scientifically - of the average Muslim nation; but this further prove others ethnics and people's mullah first and foremost are nationalist that want to work for their ethnic interest—this hold true for Mullah Massod to Mullah Rabbani to Mullah Ismeal and so on. It makes me wonder what makes Pashtun Mullahs dysfunctional imbeciles butchering Pashtun for sake and interest of others? Ignorance? Personal interest? Or they seriously believe the romanticize Islamic Ummah and other bs that turns pashtuns nation into cannon fodder of Arabs and Pakis?

    Wish I could post the video as its on FB, but the good news is, the idiotic notion behind a Huntingtonian “clash of civilizations” mindset most Pakistanis specially nephew of Tehmina Durrani Abdul de paki mule have unrealistic hopes for, will be taken to their graves.
    Last edited by Azmal; 12-15-2013, 03:23 PM.
    ای وخته بېرته راشه يو افغان وزېږوه
    نو بيا يو احمد خان يا ميروس خان وزېږوه

    چې ننګ په وطن وکړئ داسي ځوان وزېږوه
    نويا خو خوشحال خان يا بادشا خان وزېږوه

    سپن اوشن بيرغ د ازادۍ کړي زمونږ پورته
    بيا داسې يو بادشا لکه امان وزيږوه

    چې جوړه کړي انګريز ته بيا غزا د ارنوۍ
    يو داسې لوی غازي ميرزمان خان وزيږوه

    سرو مال قربان کړي له وطن او له ناموسه
    په مينه د وطن کي افغانان وزيږوه

    ټپې د ازادۍ کړه بورا ته په خيالونو
    اوس راشه په شعرنو کي طوفان وزيږو

  • #2
    A Pashtun by defintion cannot become Mullah because these are two different identities. A Mullah ethnically is not Pashtun.

    Pashtunwali clealrly separates Mullah and Pashtun, Jumat and Hujra. Mullah is for jumat while Pashtun is for the hujra. This is the inbuilt secularism in Pashtun society.

    This balance was disturbed by the US and Arab money when after 1979 Mullah became rich and wanted to have both Jumat and Hujra.

    After Arab money mosques got stronger while hujras and Pashtun nationalism declined and we see the outcome in form of Taliban in Pashtunland.

    Pashtuns have rich culture, music, dance, traditions, values, way of life but Islamism is the worst danger for all these features of Pashtun society.

    Pashtuns have to once again establish the equilibrium of Hujra and Jumat otherwise Mullah will become the only leader of Pashtuns as it is already happening throughout.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Badlun View Post
      A Pashtun by defintion cannot become Mullah because these are two different identities. A Mullah ethnically is not Pashtun.

      Pashtunwali clealrly separates Mullah and Pashtun, Jumat and Hujra. Mullah is for jumat while Pashtun is for the hujra. This is the inbuilt secularism in Pashtun society.

      This balance was disturbed by the US and Arab money when after 1979 Mullah became rich and wanted to have both Jumat and Hujra.

      After Arab money mosques got stronger while hujras and Pashtun nationalism declined and we see the outcome in form of Taliban in Pashtunland.

      Pashtuns have rich culture, music, dance, traditions, values, way of life but Islamism is the worst danger for all these features of Pashtun society.

      Pashtuns have to once again establish the equilibrium of Hujra and Jumat otherwise Mullah will become the only leader of Pashtuns as it is already happening throughout.
      Badlun wrora, i'm getting really tired of your anti islamic stance on here.

      Please stop.
      "Revenge is a dish best served cold".

      -Old Pashtun proverb




      "My Pashtun Pride i will not hide!"

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Kushan Prince View Post
        Badlun wrora, i'm getting really tired of your anti islamic stance on here.

        Please stop.
        I will strongly suggest that you think over two words and their difference while reading my posts on religious or political subjects. Islam and Islamism. I am against Islamism and not Islam.

        If still you do not appreciate the difference, show my posts to your father and he may appreciate what I write and then share the feedback please.

        If you are really a well wisher of Pashtuns and Pashtunwali then you must identify your enemies. Your enemy no 1 is neither Punjabi nor tajik but Mullah, Islamist, wahabi, Salafi, Talib who want to destroy everything Pashtun and submit us totally to Arab culture in the garb of Islam.

        Comment


        • #5
          The reason why Pashtuns have taken to Wahabism is because Pashtunwali is like Wahhabism.

          Think about it; what are the major things that Wahhabists are known for? Depriving women basic rights like , using harsh unwarranted punishments for petty crimes.

          This is true also in Pashtunwali

          Pashtunwali denies women inheritance, which in turn is denying women the right of Agency and Self determination. Pashtuns restrict the movement of women and their participation in society.

          Wahhabism also denies women self determination; invent rulings to usurp their Islamic rights of inheritance and restrict the movement of women and participation of society

          Pashtunwali is basically the Native Pashtun version of Wahhabism.
          [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

          2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Badlun View Post
            I will strongly suggest that you think over two words and their difference while reading my posts on religious or political subjects. Islam and Islamism. I am against Islamism and not Islam.

            If still you do not appreciate the difference, show my posts to your father and he may appreciate what I write and then share the feedback please.

            If you are really a well wisher of Pashtuns and Pashtunwali then you must identify your enemies. Your enemy no 1 is neither Punjabi nor tajik but Mullah, Islamist, wahabi, Salafi, Talib who want to destroy everything Pashtun and submit us totally to Arab culture in the garb of Islam.

            Actually I used to think you were just a Progressive Thinker and not Anti-Islam; but after you've made posts suggesting that zina/fornication no longer be be seen as immoral by hijacking my arguments about understanding rational necessity of welfare in application of Islamic injunctions and your recent attempts at trying to disregard Islamic standards of Halal and promoting stunning under false pretenses.

            I'm starting get impressions that you're trying to attack Islam through "soft means" ...by portraying and gradualy chipping away at Islamic principles to conform with anti-Islamic ones

            so I think Kushan is very right in making these statements ....youre showing signs of being Anti-Islam ....and not simply Islamism or whatever made up word they use in media.

            if you were anti-Islamism you'd focus purely in the Wahhabi narrative; however you're attacking things fundamental to all Muslims. Which is in essence what would characterize being Anti-Islam ....your signs are apparent.
            [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

            2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
              The reason why Pashtuns have taken to Wahabism is because Pashtunwali is like Wahhabism.

              Think about it; what are the major things that Wahhabists are known for? Depriving women basic rights like , using harsh unwarranted punishments for petty crimes.

              This is true also in Pashtunwali

              Pashtunwali denies women inheritance, which in turn is denying women the right of Agency and Self determination. Pashtuns restrict the movement of women and their participation in society.

              Wahhabism also denies women self determination; invent rulings to usurp their Islamic rights of inheritance and restrict the movement of women and participation of society

              Pashtunwali is basically the Native Pashtun version of Wahhabism.

              and you sufis giving woman rights`? i dont see them dancing in your sufi tempels, side by side with you ,your bacha bazi cult lol

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                Actually I used to think you were just a Progressive Thinker and not Anti-Islam; but after you've made posts suggesting that zina/fornication no longer be be seen as immoral by hijacking my arguments about understanding rational necessity of welfare in application of Islamic injunctions and your recent attempts at trying to disregard Islamic standards of Halal and promoting stunning under false pretenses.

                I'm starting get impressions that you're trying to attack Islam through "soft means" ...by portraying and gradualy chipping away at Islamic principles to conform with anti-Islamic ones

                so I think Kushan is very right in making these statements ....youre showing signs of being Anti-Islam ....and not simply Islamism or whatever made up word they use in media.

                if you were anti-Islamism you'd focus purely in the Wahhabi narrative; however you're attacking things fundamental to all Muslims. Which is in essence what would characterize being Anti-Islam ....your signs are apparent.
                you just figured that out mr. almost phd?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                  The reason why Pashtuns have taken to Wahabism is because Pashtunwali is like Wahhabism.

                  Think about it; what are the major things that Wahhabists are known for? Depriving women basic rights like , using harsh unwarranted punishments for petty crimes.

                  This is true also in Pashtunwali

                  Pashtunwali denies women inheritance, which in turn is denying women the right of Agency and Self determination. Pashtuns restrict the movement of women and their participation in society.

                  Wahhabism also denies women self determination; invent rulings to usurp their Islamic rights of inheritance and restrict the movement of women and participation of society

                  Pashtunwali is basically the Native Pashtun version of Wahhabism.
                  Do you really believe this or are you just trying your best to use false narrative to demonize Pashtuns.

                  Dude,
                  What the Saudis practice and pashtunwali are completely at odds.
                  1. having some foreign male drive your woman around town is against pashtunwali. pashtunahs drive cars in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Pashtuns don't impose their version of pashtunwali on others like Saudis do.

                  pashtunwali itself does not restrict inheritance. Its up to the house hold.

                  Stop making things up.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Khilji View Post
                    and you sufis giving woman rights`? i dont see them dancing in your sufi tempels, side by side with you ,your bacha bazi cult lol
                    the guy is not a sufi, ghul. stop derailing the thread.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by khushal View Post
                      the guy is not a sufi, ghul. stop derailing the thread.
                      angry warlord lover,
                      thats what he claimed to be a sufi and from kandahar....

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Azmal View Post
                        Just watch a video of Punjshiri Mullah’s anti-pashtun verbal masturbation which to my surprise was received with cheer of “Takbeer Allah of Abar” of Punjshiri. Not that I don’t know the dilapidated condition – both morally and scientifically - of the average Muslim nation; but this further prove others ethnics and people's mullah first and foremost are nationalist that want to work for their ethnic interest—this hold true for Mullah Massod to Mullah Rabbani to Mullah Ismeal and so on. It makes me wonder what makes Pashtun Mullahs dysfunctional imbeciles butchering Pashtun for sake and interest of others? Ignorance? Personal interest? Or they seriously believe the romanticize Islamic Ummah and other bs that turns pashtuns nation into cannon fodder of Arabs and Pakis?

                        Wish I could post the video as its on FB, but the good news is, the idiotic notion behind a Huntingtonian “clash of civilizations” mindset most Pakistanis specially nephew of Tehmina Durrani Abdul de paki mule have unrealistic hopes for, will be taken to their graves.
                        What nonsense logic are you using here?

                        What butchering? The Pashtun mullah brought peace not only to Pashtuns but your farsiwans as well. The ones that did the butchering of all afghans were your saleh, fahim, dostom, wahdat warlords and the commies like najib who sold their people. Not only did your warlords butcher afghans but you help foreign forces butcher afghan presently. Its the Pashtun mullah who defends afghans from all aggression, foreign and domestic. The Pashtun mullah understands his people. If anything they are the only who stop the butchering.
                        Last edited by khushal; 12-16-2013, 04:06 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by khushal View Post
                          What nonsense logic are you using here?

                          What butchering? The Pashtun mullah brought peace not only to Pashtuns but your farsiwans as well. The ones that did the butchering of all afghans were your saleh, fahim, dostom, wahdat warlords and the commies like najib who sold their people. Not only did your warlords butcher afghans but you help foreign forces butcher afghan presently. Its the Pashtun mullah who defends afghans from all aggression, foreign and domestic. The Pashtun mullah understands his people. If anything they are the only who stop the butchering.
                          Pashtun Mullahs (Omar, Haqqanis) protect their people and kill Farsiwan. Farsiwan Mullahs protect their people and kill Pashtuns.

                          X mullahs kill Y, etc.

                          Ethnic violence has been going on since the last 50 years. Nothing good has come out of Afghanistan.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Al-Afghani View Post
                            Pashtun Mullahs (Omar, Haqqanis) protect their people and kill Farsiwan. Farsiwan Mullahs protect their people and kill Pashtuns.

                            X mullahs kill Y, etc.

                            Ethnic violence has been going on since the last 50 years. Nothing good has come out of Afghanistan.
                            Omar and Haqani's issue is with the US, they regard the regime the US built regardless of who is in it(Pashtun, Tajik, hazara, Uzbek and there are former Taliban who are in that regime) as a puppet of the US and not of the afghan people. Their struggle is not Pashtun vs farswan. Its the farswan fascists who portray it that way for political purposes. They are using hitlers tactics of fear to stay in power.

                            Ethnic conflict started when masood took Kabul in 92, before that there was no ethnic conflict.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                              The reason why Pashtuns have taken to Wahabism is because Pashtunwali is like Wahhabism.

                              Think about it; what are the major things that Wahhabists are known for? Depriving women basic rights like , using harsh unwarranted punishments for petty crimes.

                              This is true also in Pashtunwali

                              Pashtunwali denies women inheritance, which in turn is denying women the right of Agency and Self determination. Pashtuns restrict the movement of women and their participation in society.

                              Wahhabism also denies women self determination; invent rulings to usurp their Islamic rights of inheritance and restrict the movement of women and participation of society

                              Pashtunwali is basically the Native Pashtun version of Wahhabism.
                              Pashtunwali in its pristine (pre-Islam or pre-Islamism of 1979) has nothing to do with Wahabism. There is no theology, no monotheism, no concept of God, no concept of Islamic metaphysics, no forms of worship recommended by Islam and no religious bigotry and radicalism propagated by Wahabism.

                              Pashtunwali is a social and cultural phenomenon with some political elements like Jirga and mythology like deo Turaban and its folklore like Adam khan durranai, sheralam memonai, yousaf khan sherbano etc. Nothing religious there while Wahabism is pure religion.

                              I have one fundamental question from you. Can you clearly say what is Islam for you and what is Islamism? Just few lines whenever you have time. For me Qur'an and Sunna in its literal sense is Wahabism or Islamism while Islam is only the five pillars and morality but not everything written in Quran and Hadith literally.

                              If you think Islam is a complete code of life and everything in Qur'an and Hadith is Islam then there is no difference between Wahabism/Islamism/Talibanism and Islam. Then you cannot prove Wahabis and others wrong as all their arguments are based on Qur'an and Hadith.
                              Last edited by Badlun; 12-16-2013, 05:17 PM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X