BBC: It is thought that in the past some major peace deals have been made between the government and the Taliban but many have not endured. It is said Taliban have been the cause of the failure of those deals. Is this correct?
Mehsud: Praise be to God, we are autonomous in what we do, but you can clearly see that the government of Pakistan bombs innocent tribal people due to pressure of America, to make America happy to earn dollars. They demolish mosques and madrassas, like they did with the Red Mosque and Jamia Hafsa [next-door women's seminary] in Islamabad. Peace deals failed because of the government. Drone strikes conducted by Americans were backed by Pakistan. Then the Americans pressed Pakistan to start ground operations in these areas, and Pakistan complied. So the government is responsible for past failures, and we have evidence of that which we can share if anyone from the government would sit down with us.
. . .
BBC: There is usually a lot of tension on the India-Pakistan border. If the two countries go to war, which side will you support?
Mehsud: We will stand with the Muslims. We call on both governments and the Muslim people to submit themselves to the Islamic system, which guarantees success in this world as well as in the hereafter. We will stand by the Muslims.
Full interview: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-24466791
Well done to this fellow, Mehsud. The last answer is very interesting and is a clear rejection of the ideology and entity of napakistan by Mehsud. Good answer by him, why should Mehsud and other Pashtuns fight for napakistan against India? napakistan is a country of Punjabis, not a country for Muslims. There is no logic or basis to napakistan and Mehsud treating the pakis and Indians as the same sh*t in his reply was a sound rejection of this diseased punjabistan.
Mehsud: Praise be to God, we are autonomous in what we do, but you can clearly see that the government of Pakistan bombs innocent tribal people due to pressure of America, to make America happy to earn dollars. They demolish mosques and madrassas, like they did with the Red Mosque and Jamia Hafsa [next-door women's seminary] in Islamabad. Peace deals failed because of the government. Drone strikes conducted by Americans were backed by Pakistan. Then the Americans pressed Pakistan to start ground operations in these areas, and Pakistan complied. So the government is responsible for past failures, and we have evidence of that which we can share if anyone from the government would sit down with us.
. . .
BBC: There is usually a lot of tension on the India-Pakistan border. If the two countries go to war, which side will you support?
Mehsud: We will stand with the Muslims. We call on both governments and the Muslim people to submit themselves to the Islamic system, which guarantees success in this world as well as in the hereafter. We will stand by the Muslims.
Full interview: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-24466791
Well done to this fellow, Mehsud. The last answer is very interesting and is a clear rejection of the ideology and entity of napakistan by Mehsud. Good answer by him, why should Mehsud and other Pashtuns fight for napakistan against India? napakistan is a country of Punjabis, not a country for Muslims. There is no logic or basis to napakistan and Mehsud treating the pakis and Indians as the same sh*t in his reply was a sound rejection of this diseased punjabistan.


Comment