Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Saving face in unwinnable war

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Saving face in unwinnable war


    ================================================== ====

    Saving face in unwinnable war

    ================================================== ====



    Sinking in debt and no closer to victory, heads may roll as the U.S. and NATO wrap up their pointless Afghan adventure

    Fire-breathing U.S. Gen. Stanley McChrystal and his Special Forces “mafia” were supposed to crush Afghan resistance to western occupation. But McChrystal was fired after rude remarks from his staff about the White House.


    A more cerebral and political general, David Petraeus, replaced McChrystal. Petraeus managed to temporarily suppress resistance in Iraq.


    Last week, the usually cautious Petraeus vowed from Kabul to “win” the Afghan War, which has cost the U.S. nearly $300 billion to date and 1,000 dead. The problem: No one can define what winning really means. Each time the U.S. reinforces, Afghan resistance grows stronger.
    Afghanistan is America’s longest-running conflict.


    The escalating war now costs U.S. taxpayers $17 billion monthly. President Barack Obama’s Afghan “surge” of 30,000 more troops will cost another $30 billion.


    The Afghan and Iraq wars — at a cost of $1 trillion — are being waged on borrowed money when the U.S. is drowning in $13.1 trillion in debt.
    America has become addicted to debt and war.
    By 2011, Canadians will have spent an estimated $18.1 billion on Afghanistan, $1,500 per household.


    The U.S. Congress, which alone can declare and fund war, shamefully allowed U.S. presidents George W. Bush and Obama to usurp this power. A majority of Americans now oppose this imperial misadventure. Though politicians fear opposing the war lest they be accused of “betraying our soldiers,” dissent is breaking into the open.


    Last week, Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele let the cat out of the bag, admitting the Afghan war was not winnable. War-loving Republicans erupted in rage, all but accusing Steele of high treason. Many of Steele’s most hawkish Republican critics had, like Bush and **** Cheney, dodged real military service during the Vietnam War.


    Republicans (I used to be one) blasted McChrystal’s sensible policy of trying to lessen Afghan civilian casualties from U.S. bombing and shelling. There is growing anti-western fury in Afghanistan and Pakistan over mounting civilian deaths.


    By clamouring for more aggressive attacks that endanger Afghan civilians and strengthen Taliban, Republicans again sadly demonstrate they have become the party and voice of America’s dim and ignorant.
    Obama claimed he was expanding the Afghan War to fight al-Qaida. Yet the Pentagon estimates there are no more than a handful of al-Qaida small-fry left in Afghanistan.


    Obama owes Americans the truth about Afghanistan.
    After nine years of war, the immense military might of the U.S., its dragooned NATO allies, and armies of mercenaries have been unable to defeat resistance to western occupation or create a popular, legitimate government in Kabul. Drug production has reached new heights.
    As the United States feted freedom from a foreign oppressor on July 4, its professional soldiers were using every sort of weapon in Afghanistan, from heavy bombers to tanks, armoured vehicles, helicopter gunships, fleets of drones, heavy artillery, cluster bombs and an arsenal of hi-tech gear.
    In spite of this might, bands of outnumbered Pashtun tribesmen and farmers, armed only with small arms, determination and limitless courage, have fought the West’s war machine to a standstill and now have it on the strategic defensive.


    This brutal David versus Goliath conflict brings no honour upon the western powers waging it, including Canada. They are widely seen abroad as waging yet another pitiless colonial war against a small, backward people for resource domination and strategic geography.


    Most Afghans yearn for peace after 30 years of war. But efforts by the government of Hamid Karzai, Taliban and Pakistan to forge a peace are being thwarted by Washington, Ottawa and Afghanistan’s Communist-dominated Tajik Northern Alliance. India stirs the pot in Afghanistan while rebellion seethes in Indian-held Kashmir.


    The heretical Republican Steele was speaking truth when he said this ugly, pointless war is unwinnable. But Washington’s imperial impulses continue. Too many political careers in the U.S., Canada and Europe hang on this misbegotten war. So, too, does the fate of the obsolete NATO alliance that may well meet its Waterloo in the hills of Afghanistan.



    ================================================== ====

    http://www.torontosun.com/comment/co.../14663076.html

    ================================================== ====

  • #2
    Originally posted by pakistani
    The USA needs to trust Pakistan to win this war. Now they are not listening to us.
    Khudae Qur'an tha ogoraa Pakhtano bandae worahmagae. Yaw khabaraa daa da Ghulam da Mashar makhae tha qrrathae na kaee ao che kaee nu bya ya khathmaee ao yaa kharsae. Dwaemaa khabaraa duniya domra ham khraa na dee.
    http://i29.tinypic.com/2a6j8jm.gif

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by pakistani
      The USA needs to trust Pakistan to win this war. Now they are not listening to us.
      The last time they trusted the Pakistanis, they got an unexpected alteration in the New York skyline.

      In any case, the biggest losers will be Afghans in the short-run and Pakistan in the long-run. Afghans will suffer the madness of the mullahs because a post-withdrawal setup would inevitably bring the Taliban to the forefront and Pakistan will suffer when that mullah influence once more begins to creep back into Laal Masjid and the mosques and medressahs of Karachi and Lahore.

      At best therefore, it will be a Pyrrhic victory of sorts for the Pakistani establishment. The fact is that their incursion into Afghan state affairs led into an all-out conflict in FATA - a conflict that is still far from any sort of conclusion. After the 2002 border stand-off with India, I think Pakistan knows that India will not attack it with its ground forces. Therefore, strategic depth as a political and military policy is obsolete now. The real aim is to have a friendly figure-head in Afghanistan so as to avoid the Durrand Line issue, which any civilian Afghan government would raise.

      Lastly, Steele will obviously be negative about the war. The Afghan war has always been the Democrats' war in the sense that they've always argued for pulling out of Iraq to focus on Afghanistan to find a man in a cave. Steele is the opposition leader. He's scoring political points.
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be".

      "Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives".

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by pakistani
        The USA needs to trust Pakistan to win this war. Now they are not listening to us.

        have you considered changing your nickname to Irony?

        I am no bird, and no nest ensnares me.

        non commercial would cost less if he was in charge himself which he plans on doing. right now it's n herat but soon it will be in qanadahar.

        Comment

        Working...
        X