Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Britain 'ready to launch Syria strikes'

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    Britain 'ready to launch Syria strikes'

    MPs Given Urgent Vote On Military Response To Syria Chemical Weapons Attack









    Now if you've been following the news on the Syria conflict, on thursday UK military will initiate the time for its first wave of attacks against Syria. The defense minister has said British land, sea and air forces are awaiting deployment.

    This is a full scale offensive by Britain, whats your opinions on this? why are they so concerned? what is their motive? is it soleley for peace? or are they gaining something out of this? surely this will cost Britain billions when the country's economy is already being drained. Is this an invasion?
    ----------

    *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

    Originally posted by Karachi
    like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here
    Tags: britain, launch, ready, strikes, syria
  • #2
    Urgent! Spread the News: British officials planned the Syrian war 2 years prior to the protests - YouTube

    Comment

    • #3
      People are being massacred, no doubt. However, there is also a strategic interest here.
      Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.

      A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai

      For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."


      The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!

      -Ferishta, 1560–1620

      Comment

      • #4
        Originally posted by Admin Khan View Post
        People are being massacred, no doubt. However, there is also a strategic interest here.
        over 100.000 people died. Much more will die in near future. Intervention won't protect human life. It will only protect certain political and economic interests.
        Originally posted by Firdousi
        Never talk with Afghans about politics. All their political knowledge is limited to conspiracy theories, political demonization and contradictions. No logic, no reason.

        Comment

        • #5
          The public are opposing another foreign war, there is condemnation from British MP's. opposition partys have said "There's almost no public appetite to enter into another foreign war and I think his own backbenchers are really very scared of what this might do to their prospects."

          UKIP leader Nigel Farage claims his own party's decision to oppose military intervention was "the single most popular thing Ukip's ever said". and that "Our social media sites over the last 48 hours have shown this to be the single most popular thing Ukip's ever said, which is fascinating."

          Russia has said that going to war without approval from a UN council meeting is against the United Nations Regulations.

          UN secretary general Ban Ki-moon stressed the need for the inspectors in Syria to be given time to complete their task and more time is needed to gather evidence for the use of chemical weaopons before going to war with Syria.

          Despite this and many other factors, the Prime Minister David Cameron has already sent six Typhoon fighter jets to the region. The Government is ignoring all public outcrys to not wage a war, it is ignoring international requirements and other UK political partys..So for whose interest is David Cameron working if not for the people?.

          The UK military will no doubt annihilate all infulstructures and bring the country to the ground, Syria will be bombed to the Stone Age as was Iraq, we will see rape cases and torture just how we did so a few years ago in Abu Ghuraib..the civilian casulties will rise from 100,000 to Millions - we have seen this exact (Problem > Reaction > Solution) happen too many times in Iraq, Libya etc etc and yet everyone is still asleep. In Iraq people say "Saddam was bad, but the west is even worse for what they did to us" .. no doubt the Syrians will be saying "Bashar was bad, but the west is een worse"
          ----------

          *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

          Originally posted by Karachi
          like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

          Comment

          • #6
            David Cameron is telling MPs video apparently from the scene of the attack last week makes harrowing viewing and is good evidence that there was a chemical attack. He says the sight of dead children is not easy to forget and urges MPs to watch the films, however why Cameron's amnesia over previous use of chemical weapons by UK allies - white phosphorous in Falluja? DU in Basra? No consistent policy here.
            ----------

            *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

            Originally posted by Karachi
            like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

            Comment

            • #7
              He's been defeated in the house of commons, which is virtually unheard of in the UK.

              1. I think after there threats against Syria, the western states have recieved warnings from the Russia-China-Syria axis and are backing down.

              Conservative MPs would not vote against their government if they were told not to, they have been allowed to vote against it.

              2. This makes things difficult for the US. At the most there will be some limited strikes which makes no major impact on the conflict, which the Syrians are winning anyway against the "rebels".
              * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

              Comment

              • #8
                Someone should do something.
                [SIZE="4"][COLOR="Orange"][B][FONT="Impact"][SIZE="6"]Top Goon[/SIZE][/FONT][/B][/COLOR][/SIZE]

                [B]Blop Blop[/B]

                Comment

                Previous template Next
                Working...
                X