Should Afghanistan start claiming it's dispute with Jammu and Kashmir?

[Toramana]

All i know is Kashmir was also part of the Durrani empire, and was one of the regions lost to the Sikh and Hindus. Now that i think of it, could Afghanistan have a claim in for Jammu and Kashmir, assuming if we keep Afghanisan's multi-ethnic style (meaning not just focusing on Pashtuns, but on lands that were Ex-Durrani or Afghan, note Afghan's definition became multi-ethnic after Ahmed Shah Durrani)

You are consistently posting these senseless, stupid threads here.

[MostafaM]

Musa Khan,

you sound like a white supremacist who tries to influence the views of Pashtuns.

Be sure that Pashtuns don´t follow your "Aryan Brotherhood" theories and Jammu and Kashmir are for the Kashmiri people.

Not Afghanistans, Indias, Pakistans or Chinas business at all.

And for the record:
if we go back far enough, mankind originated from Africa.
It´s ridiculous if someone would invade the Republic of Kongo in the name of mankind.

So, here is the answer to your next question (which you haven´t asked yet):

NO!
Afghans have no right to annex the Republic of Kongo.

[faye]

humankind already is one race but superficially divided into tribes and countries, etc.

[MostafaM]

So you are saying we are 1 race? none-sense, you think all humans to work together for a better tomorrow? Rubbish, we are not all one, we are not the same, we have races, divisions etc. , 7 billion of us are different and will have to go seperate ways.

Can you elaborate where you see the separation lines and who exactly should go different ways?

[faye]

it is called 'the human race'. never heard of it, musa?
you appear to be an advocate of divisions, constantly pointing out differences rather than the similarities.
your agenda appears to me, to be negative.

[Admin Khan]

No.

[Karachi]

in the past many people conquered different areas, that doesn't mean they can claim it now, the last thing kashmiries need is another occupier

[Kushan Prince]

No. Kashmir was never Afghanistan's to begin with. After the creation of India the afghans signed a treaty with the British not to lay claim on Kashmir. Britan themselves agreed not to incorporate that area into their empire.

[Kushan Prince]

Musa Khan,

you sound like a white supremacist who tries to influence the views of Pashtuns.

Be sure that Pashtuns don´t follow your "Aryan Brotherhood" theories and Jammu and Kashmir are for the Kashmiri people.

Not Afghanistans, Indias, Pakistans or Chinas business at all.

And for the record:
if we go back far enough, mankind originated from Africa.
It´s ridiculous if someone would invade the Republic of Kongo in the name of mankind.

So, here is the answer to your next question (which you haven´t asked yet):

NO!
Afghans have no right to annex the Republic of Kongo.

The out of Africa theory has already been squashed. Darwin was a nutcase who also belived humans evolved from apes.

[Shehbaz Khan]

This is what astonishes me when weak countries like Afghanistan and Pakistan discuss such things. On every second corner here in Pakistan you will find a guy too anxious about Ghazwa-e-Hind and that when are we going to attack India, America, Israel. Really? Like all our issues resolved? Like we really can go towards that? We have enough food in our Refrigerators? Let's first resolve our internal issues like poverty and illiteracy