List of Terrorist Groups Produced in Pakistan

[єѕαρχαι]

TTP is a proxy of raw not isi

[indian]

ttp people are your isi goons

[єѕαρχαι]

they are supported by raw.
ISI supports afghan taliban.

Or you better stick to RSS , bajrang dal lol

[indian]

they are supported by raw.
ISI supports afghan taliban.

Or you better stick to RSS , bajrang dal lol

they not even terrorist organizations they are goons only.and see your long list.

[MazloomyarMaseed]

Nothing wrong with having terrorist groups as long as they're terrorizing the right people for a beneficial cause

Majority of the groups on the list terrorize Hindu and Sikh aggressors who are occupying Kashmir and India, there's absolutely nothing wrong with that at all

Well since you talibs only terrorize civillians I would take whatever you ISI proxies say with a Pinch of Salt

Secondly Mutakhasis sending militias to fight another soverign state is a big violation of international law and will do more harm to the country of its creation then its struggle, I.E Pakistan.

Pakistan has a big history of sending people such as you to fight for its interests but now the world has become very tired of Pakistans terrorist activities especially in Kashmir.

Since your probably just another madrassah educated student most probably from Lal masjid or some other punjabi madrassah, what would you know besides being a proxy of ISI? WHat do you know about Laws,rules and the role of these groups?

When I see the Jamiets cry on the TV begging Pakistan to accept them not as terrorists, I laugh at them, you know why? its because they enjoyed the 30 years of breeding terrorism throughout Asia and the whole world and now the World has turned on them and they have no where to run 2.

Bye bye bye Jihadis, the days of the 70's is well over
Kind Regards

[pir_Rokhan]

As I reiterate, there's nothing wrong with having terrorist groups as long as they are terrorising the right group of people for a right cause

Now if you can't handle that, oh well

Mutakhasis

You are absolutely wrong. There is no proof whatsoever even from Quran or Sunnah which encourages or legitmises this anarchic approach and even labelling it Islamic too.

"Terrorising the right people for the right job" assuming this phraseology is worth using, which I doubt, is ONLY THE FUCNTION AND RESPONSIBILTY OF A STATE whether it is a theocratic Islamic state or a modern nation state.

What you are referring to can be true for a group of people with abnormal and insane state of mind but any real state having judiciary,executive and legislature as its institutions does not permit any such group.

Please quote your reference which convinces your mind to defend these terrorist groups headed by religeous bigots and insane pshychic cases so that we might be able to have a critical review of it without using any cheap vocabulary.

[pir_Rokhan]

Wars that are not for the establishment of islam: Are unjust, wasteful wars. With lives dying in vain.

This is another form of brainwashing which the agencies of relieous colonialists use to indoctrinate those guinnea pigs who are naive enough not to understand that they are being used to strengthen theocratic imperialism.

[pir_Rokhan]

Dictionary dot com defines "terrorism" as:

Noun

1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes.
2. the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.
3. a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.

Without being mislead by these terms which were defined prior to the actual phenomenon took its worst form,let me define terrorism as

constraining the freedom to live without any fear ,according to one own's understanding of life, using violent means whether .

Dont follow the definitions of the offenders of humanity without critically evaluating what they have to offer, using violent means [whether by state or a group]

Pukhto key waee che yaw kas ta che wael che halaka ghal drna ghwag otakhto wersha gghal oneesa aw hagha kas baghair da khpal ghwag kato na ghal pasay wer manda kra.

[BLS_1919v2.0]

Pir Rokhan,

Don't you think Islam is under attack in the war in Afghanistan? They west has pretty much equated Islam = terrorists if you think about it. (Busy legacy).

Even a Pakistani analyst had claimed that the USA had asked Mullah Omar to drop Islamic govt or face war.

If such was the case then why isn't there a war in Saudi or Sudan. Both profess to be islamic but are actually a facade. Dropping terminologies are not enough to set up political policy. The interests run far and wide than mere dropping islamic government.

[pir_Rokhan]

Pir Rokhan,

Don't you think Islam is under attack in the war in Afghanistan?
The west has pretty much equated Islam = terrorists if you think about it. (Busy legacy).

Even a Pakistani analyst had claimed that the USA had asked Mullah Omar to drop Islamic govt or face war.

Islam will only be under attack when soemone academically challenges the basic concepts of Islam which US or NATO forces are least bothered about.

It is the Afghan Muslims who who are under attack but not by the NATO forces but by those who want to impose themselves on the people of Afghanistan and want to legitimise their regime by using the name of Islam and under the influence of Pakistani ISI who want that Afghanistan always remian dependent on them.

How could a rag tag Mullah Omar pose a threat to the most poweful nation of the world. They would love one Mulalh Omar and one Osama in every country which has got reserves as it would give them a justification for waging war.

[BLS_1919v2.0]

jasmine any group strong enough is a direct threat. That would be the nature politics.

[Mutakhasis]

Well since you talibs only terrorize civillians I would take whatever you ISI proxies say with a Pinch of Salt

Secondly Mutakhasis sending militias to fight another soverign state is a big violation of international law and will do more harm to the country of its creation then its struggle, I.E Pakistan.

Pakistan has a big history of sending people such as you to fight for its interests but now the world has become very tired of Pakistans terrorist activities especially in Kashmir.

Since your probably just another madrassah educated student most probably from Lal masjid or some other punjabi madrassah, what would you know besides being a proxy of ISI? WHat do you know about Laws,rules and the role of these groups?

When I see the Jamiets cry on the TV begging Pakistan to accept them not as terrorists, I laugh at them, you know why? its because they enjoyed the 30 years of breeding terrorism throughout Asia and the whole world and now the World has turned on them and they have no where to run 2.

Bye bye bye Jihadis, the days of the 70's is well over
Kind Regards

Hahah, I love the comedy

[BLS_1919v2.0]

So technically you agree with me?

That is what I am saying, The Taliban still rules Afghanistan as we speak.

Pir_Rokhan should pay Kandahar a visit to check and see who runs the show.

I request Kandahar to visit Kunar,Kandahar,Helmand and to conduct a survery and find out how many people actually "miss" the Taliban after they saw the USA has committed.

Jasmine you are worried about Kandahar, when the very status of US reserve currency can break entire nations. US is a far bigger giant than our areas and their influence extends wider too. What I told you is that in the greater scheme of things i.e. geo-strategic level, if a set number of countries try to build a bloc against the US, obviously they would sideline it. However, that is not the case with taliban. At best they are insurgents driving foreign power out and at worse the US look at it in the greater regional context (a proxy war, etc).

[Mutakhasis]

Mutakhasis

You are absolutely wrong. There is no proof whatsoever even from Quran or Sunnah which encourages or legitmises this anarchic approach and even labelling it Islamic too.

"Terrorising the right people for the right job" assuming this phraseology is worth using, which I doubt, is ONLY THE FUCNTION AND RESPONSIBILTY OF A STATE whether it is a theocratic Islamic state or a modern nation state.

What you are referring to can be true for a group of people with abnormal and insane state of mind but any real state having judiciary,executive and legislature as its institutions does not permit any such group.

Please quote your reference which convinces your mind to defend these terrorist groups headed by religeous bigots and insane pshychic cases so that we might be able to have a critical review of it without using any cheap vocabulary.

"And prepare against them whatever you are able of power and of steeds of war by which you may terrify the enemy of Allaah and your enemy and others besides them whom you do not know but whom Allaah knows. And whatever you spend in the cause of Allaah will be fully repaid to you, and you will not be wronged."

وَأَعِدُّوا لَهُم مَّا اسْتَطَعْتُم مِّن قُوَّةٍ وَمِن رِّبَاطِ الْخَيْلِ تُرْهِبُونَ بِهِ عَدُوَّ اللَّهِ وَعَدُوَّكُمْ
وَآخَرِينَ مِن دُونِهِمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَهُمُ اللَّهُ يَعْلَمُهُمْ ۚ وَمَا تُنفِقُوا مِن شَيْءٍ فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ يُوَفَّ إِلَيْكُمْ وَأَنتُمْ لَا تُظْلَمُونَ


"Turhiboon" means to terrorise, to horrify, to terrify

Allaah has commanded us to terrorise His enemies and our enemies in a state of war, this is a good form of terrorism which is praised

Looking at terrorism in a negative manner is a logical fallacy, one has to look at it from how it's defined and not from the indoctrinated lie mechanized by the media as many have done

This is why when someone calls another a terrorist, they would think it's an offensive negative label, while in reality it's perfectly fine as long as the terrorist is terrorising the right people

Gaia couldn't understand this and handle reality that she wasn't brainwashed with, her little bubble was burst