Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pakistan: Concubine among nations

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pakistan: Concubine among nations

    Pakistan: Concubine among nations 5
    Pakistan is not the only developing country that seeks aid. However, while others show gratitude, Pakistan responds with arrogance

    BY TAREK FATAH

    Believe it or not, Dr. Shakil Afridi, the man responsible for locating the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden, instead of receiving the $25-million bounty on the jihadi terrorist’s head, has been convicted of treason by Pakistan and sentenced to 33 years in prison.

    To understand this bizarre sentencing of a man who should’ve been celebrated as a hero, one has to understand the schizophrenic nature of the Pakistani state itself. Among the community of nations, Pakistan today stands out on one hand as a petty thug brandishing a dangerous weapon, and at other times as a concubine, sleeping with anyone willing to pay for her expensive tastes.

    Stung by the humiliation of being caught in the act of providing a safe haven to the world’s number one terrorist, the Pakistani military took its revenge by imprisoning Dr. Afridi and shutting down the supply routes to NATO troops in Afghanistan.

    Shamelessly, Pakistan is also demanding a U.S. apology.

    The country needs tough love. But no one is willing to wrestle Islamabad to the ground and drag it away to a detox centre where it can be woken from its visions of grandeur and confronted with its true worth — a nation that can offer nothing to the world other than jihadi terrorism.

    Pakistan is not the only developing country that seeks aid. However, while others show gratitude, Pakistan responds with arrogance.

    One month after its creation in August 1947, its founder, M.A. Jinnah, dispatched a senior finance official to Washington with a begging bowl and a demand for $2 billion in aid. His message: If Pakistan collapses, the Soviets will be able to walk to the warm waters of the Arabian Sea.

    While his official lobbied Washington, back in Karachi, Jinnah was flaunting Pakistan’s geo-strategic location to the U.S. media. He told Margaret Bourke-White of Life magazine:

    “America needs Pakistan more than Pakistan needs America … Pakistan is the pivot of the world, as we are placed [on] the frontier on which the future position of the world revolves.” Bourke-White wrote. Jinnah leaned toward her, dropped his voice to a confidential note, and wagged his finger. “Russia,” he said, “is not so very far away.” The Cold War had barely begun and here was the founder of Pakistan trying to benefit from the impending clash between the USSR and USA.

    For 65 years the U.S. has succumbed to Pakistan — until now.

    Thanks to congressmen Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) and Brad Sherman (D-CA) as well as Sen. John McCain, the Pakistan bluff has been called. Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham has referred to Pakistan as “a schizophrenic ally” while Democrat Sen. Patrick Leahy said Pakistan’s conviction of Dr. Afridi, was “Alice in Wonderland at best.”

    But talk is cheap.

    The time has come for Canada, the U.S. and the West to draw a line in the sand. If Pakistan is unwilling to free Dr. Afridi and arrest the al-Qaeida leader Ayman Zawahiri, then we should cut all aid to Islamabad.

    The U.S., U.K. and Canada should ban the entry of all Pakistani military officers, serving or retired, as well as their families and children. The thousands of Pakistan civil and military officials who have descended on America and Canada should be asked to leave immediately.

    Hit them where it hurts the country’s top brass and the establishment will buckle. If we don’t, a thousand AQ Khans will bloom.


    Believe it or not, Dr. Shakil Afridi, the man responsible for locating the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden, instead of receiving the $25-million bounty on the jihadi…
    Last edited by Toramana; 05-29-2012, 11:47 PM.

  • #2
    The passage below is worth-reading and pondering about.

    "One month after its creation in August 1947, its founder, M.A. Jinnah, dispatched a senior finance official to Washington with a begging bowl and a demand for $2 billion in aid. His message: If Pakistan collapses, the Soviets will be able to walk to the warm waters of the Arabian Sea.

    While his official lobbied Washington, back in Karachi, Jinnah was flaunting Pakistan’s geo-strategic location to the U.S. media. He told Margaret Bourke-White of Life magazine:

    “America needs Pakistan more than Pakistan needs America … Pakistan is the pivot of the world, as we are placed [on] the frontier on which the future position of the world revolves.” Bourke-White wrote. Jinnah leaned toward her, dropped his voice to a confidential note, and wagged his finger. “Russia,” he said, “is not so very far away.” The Cold War had barely begun and here was the founder of Pakistan trying to benefit from the impending clash between the USSR and USA."

    Comment


    • #3
      Do you know who Tarek Fateh is? Since you are in Canada you should know he is.

      If an honor less person like him says something it is almost certain thats its bull****.

      Why don't you Afghans do something useful? This hatred for another nation serves no body. Instead both countries need to work to improve conditions. Particularly we need to address the concerns of the poor that make up about 70% of Pakistani populace and 90% of Afghan populace.

      E-racists like you are doing a great disservice to Afghanistan.

      Also by claiming to be a southern Pashtun you cannot change the opinions prevailing in Pakhtunkhwa. You Afghans seriously need to build your own nation. I understand what you have been through with constant warfare and all and that has left you suspicious of your neighbors but hatred never achieves anything.

      Our country made some mistakes but believe me we have nothing against the Afghan. Our every action was for the betterment of the Afghan people. It doesn't matter if you don't believe that.
      I am the author of Badal, an upcoming fiction novel on the War on Terror. For more information about me visit [URL="http://www.havisultan.com"]www.havisultan.com[/URL]

      Follow me on twitter:
      [url]https://twitter.com/#!/HaviZSultan[/url]

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Adam
        Toramana is from Swat not Afghanistan
        He also carries Pakistani passport and Pakistani identity card

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Friend View Post
          He also carries Pakistani passport and Pakistani identity card
          With that comment on Abdur Rahman Khan he has proven that he is something else. No southern Pashtun can so easily parrot the claims of Northerners. Hell, I even doubt if hes a Pashtun Nationalist.

          No Pashtun Nationalist, especially one who thinks Pakistan is the greatest mistake on earth can say what Abdur Rahman Khan did was right because if Abdur Rahman Khan hadn't been a slave of the British and handed the south over to them just to save the north then Pakistan would never be. A situation the likes of Toramana would be very pleased with.

          I doubt he is from Swat. His logic is very linear, like Afghans. Of course they'll love it they threw the south away (they taxed them and beat them on their backs)... they didn't have to be sold to the British to be called rubbish or British slave. Such concepts were in the mind of the Afghan long before he threw the south away.

          Plus hes been doubting the identity of others for a long time. Why doesn't he prove his?
          Last edited by haviZsultan; 05-30-2012, 12:33 PM.
          I am the author of Badal, an upcoming fiction novel on the War on Terror. For more information about me visit [URL="http://www.havisultan.com"]www.havisultan.com[/URL]

          Follow me on twitter:
          [url]https://twitter.com/#!/HaviZSultan[/url]

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by haviZsultan View Post
            With that comment on Abdur Rahman Khan he has proven that he is something else. I doubt he is from Swat.

            Plus hes been doubting the identity of others for a long time. Why doesn't he prove his?
            Havi, take it a bit easy. It seems to me as if in the past 24 hours, through your posts, you've been reaching a juvenile level of excitement. Listen to me carefully, unlike most Keyboard warriors, or E-Jihadis, I have personally met up with Toramana, and can affirm that he is a Pashtun, who was an inhabitant of modern day Pakistan. He is from Swat Valley. I find it distasteful or disrespectful to be precise, when a newbie joins and begins to question an identity of an established, senior, PF member.

            What you don't realize is a handful of educated Pashtuns don't buy the usual propaganda Pakistan feeds it's students. Not everyone is as patriotic as you think, or presumably thought. Nearly every 'critic' of Pakistan that I know of, hails from Pakistan. If you really find this hard to believe, we can link up so I can enlighten you on some ground realities and introduce you to the Pashtun diaspora.
            Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.

            A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai

            For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."


            The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!

            -Ferishta, 1560–1620

            Comment


            • #7
              I heard founder of Pakistan was a freemason.


              Facebook Page name: All Afghans & Indians united against Porkistan ISI

              Link: facebook.com/AfghanInterestOnlyNoPuppetry

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by hamid954 View Post
                I heard founder of Pakistan was a freemason.

                You also work for freemasons lol.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I don't know if Jinnah was a mason himself but his friend and mentor (I believe a friend of Gandhis) was an affirmed freemason...she was Annie Besant. Jinnah was also part of the Fabian society. So it wouldn't surprise me if he was a mason. Allah u aalim.

                  P.S. I know Toranama's family personally, his nephews are friends of mine as well....he very much so from Pashtunkhwa.
                  http://i29.tinypic.com/2a6j8jm.gif

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by BLS_1919v2.0 View Post
                    I don't know if Jinnah was a mason himself but his friend and mentor (I believe a friend of Gandhis) was an affirmed freemason...she was Annie Besant. Jinnah was also part of the Fabian society. So it wouldn't surprise me if he was a mason. Allah u aalim.

                    P.S. I know Toranama's family personally, his nephews are friends of mine as well....he very much so from Pashtunkhwa.
                    Please dont call him a pashtoon. he is an atheist who does not believe in God's word.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by shadowgoverner
                      so what
                      non the less he is anti Pashtun.
                      That isn't the point. Haviz claimed someone is faking, so I am setting the record straight. Regarding him being anti or pro, well I will let him answer that himself.
                      http://i29.tinypic.com/2a6j8jm.gif

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by shadowgoverner
                        so what
                        non the less he is anti Pashtun.
                        Originally posted by Friend View Post
                        Please dont call him a pashtoon. he is an atheist who does not believe in God's word.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by haviZsultan View Post
                          Do you know who Tarek Fateh is? Since you are in Canada you should know he is.

                          If an honor less person like him says something it is almost certain thats its bull****.

                          Why don't you Afghans do something useful? This hatred for another nation serves no body. Instead both countries need to work to improve conditions. Particularly we need to address the concerns of the poor that make up about 70% of Pakistani populace and 90% of Afghan populace.

                          E-racists like you are doing a great disservice to Afghanistan.

                          Also by claiming to be a southern Pashtun you cannot change the opinions prevailing in Pakhtunkhwa. You Afghans seriously need to build your own nation. I understand what you have been through with constant warfare and all and that has left you suspicious of your neighbors but hatred never achieves anything.

                          Our country made some mistakes but believe me we have nothing against the Afghan. Our every action was for the betterment of the Afghan people. It doesn't matter if you don't believe that.


                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Toramana View Post


                            So you want the NATO supply routes from Pakistan to reopen?

                            Doesnt that put you in an uncomfortable position? So you are PRO-Pakistan because you support Pakistan's support for the NATO war.

                            All the "Paki" talk is a simple way to feel comfortable about supporting Pashtun bloodshed without saying it

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X