Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Amirul Mumineen Mullah Muhammad Umar Mujahid (Hafidhahullah) is the Promised Mahdi!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    NATO/Karzai regime is given advanced weapons and oil via the Pakistani supply routes.

    These are facts supported by evidence.

    Please provide me evidence proving that Pakistan is providing weapons to the Afghan insurgency.

    Comment


    • #32
      Please also now provide me evidence showing that Pakistani fighter jets, choppers, aircraft, etc, etc are being used by the Afghan insurgency

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
        can you show solid proof that the Taliban are following Islam?
        LOL.... Whether they are fighting for islam or not but they are still better than you like secular nationalists sitting like ducks in their houses. You are taking the name of Pakhtuns but doing nothing for the freedom of your land rather helped first the Russians and now the Americans.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Friend View Post
          LOL.... Whether they are fighting for islam or not but they are still better than you like secular nationalists sitting like ducks in their houses. You are taking the name of Pakhtuns but doing nothing for the freedom of your land rather helped first the Russians and now the Americans.
          Well if they're not fighting for Islam, then they are really secularists with a pretending to be fighting for Islam.

          just because we're against the Taliban doesn't mean we support NATO or Russia; just means we have ADL.
          [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

          2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

          Comment


          • #35
            Pakistan support for the NATO war/Karzai regime with the supply routes (which allows advanced weaponry and other logistics to NATO/ANA)

            This is undisputed. Why dont you harp on this?

            Comment


            • #36
              Pakistan's interference in Afghanistan is with the supply routes to NATO/Karzai regime.

              This is interference.

              The regional countries are against the NATO occupation of Afghanistan

              These are convergent interests with the aspirations of Afghans for the end of the occupation

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                Well if they're not fighting for Islam, then they are really secularists with a pretending to be fighting for Islam.

                just because we're against the Taliban doesn't mean we support NATO or Russia; just means we have ADL.
                If you don't support nato or russia then why you secular thugs don't come out of your nests and fight against them ? Why ?

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Friend View Post
                  Can you please provide some solid proof which could prove that Taliban are CIA's agents so that we also get benefit from your information ?
                  Ahhhh really nice question
                  You know Pakistan is one of the biggest ally of US and Saudi, You know that Alqaeda was the guest and great supporter in Afghanistan during Taliban government, Saudi which was anti Alqaeda recognized Taliban government who was providing safe heaven to alqaeda,
                  you know Usama the alqaeda leader was in Pakistan but Pakistan is the best friend of Saudi, so how Pakistan can provide shelter to the enemy of Saudi?
                  and you know that Saudi and US are great allies in the region and their deep stratigic policies are same.
                  you know Saudi helped US in occupation of labia, Iraq and now Syria,
                  You know alqaeda was in Sudan before, and then America divided that Sudan, Now they are collecting alqaeda in Yaman, and after some attacks on alqaeda they will occupy Yaman as well.
                  The same way they used in the occupation of Afghanistan, they sent alqaeda there, They sent Taliban there with help of ISI and financial support of Saudi, then they asked Tabliban to give Usama to them but ISI understood Taliban not to give Usama so that there will be a reason for US to attack Afghanistan.
                  so this is a sequential long chain.
                  Now US, ISI and Saudi supports Tabliban, because if there is no Taliban, if there is no fight so there will be no reason for US to stay here.
                  You know Taliban are attacking just Local people they don't attack the big and wide Bases of Americans, When afghan forces captures some taliban, US forces taking those Taliban from them and then free them from prison to join in fight again.
                  Why Afghan government was emphasizing on Bagram Jail to be handed over to them, because they know that Americans letting Taliban be free of prison, and that's why they were not given Bagram Jail to Afghan forces.
                  US better knows the Centers of Taliban getting training in many centers in Pakistan but they do let them to get trained and then cross the border.
                  But when true mujahideen attacks on Americans then they taking very soon action and taking revenge.
                  I can not explain this in English very well but I can do in Pashto.
                  [RIGHT][SIZE=4]********************[/SIZE][SIZE=5]
                  [COLOR=Red]په ښه خوي له بدخواهانو بې پروا یم[/COLOR][COLOR=Red]
                  په نرمۍ لکه اوبه د اور ســـــــزا یم
                  ـــــ
                  ټیټ مې مه بوله غورځنګ راباندې مه کړه
                  زه پدې افتادګۍ کې لـــــــــــوي ګړنګ یــم
                  ـــــ
                  لکه ونه مستقیم په خپل مکان یم
                  که خزان راباندې راشي که بهار[/COLOR]
                  [/SIZE][/RIGHT]

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Friend View Post
                    If you don't support nato or russia then why you secular thugs don't come out of your nests and fight against them ? Why ?


                    because Taliban are killing more Afghans than they are.
                    [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                    2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by lynx View Post
                      Pakistan's interference in Afghanistan is with the supply routes to NATO/Karzai regime.

                      This is interference.

                      The regional countries are against the NATO occupation of Afghanistan

                      These are convergent interests with the aspirations of Afghans for the end of the occupation


                      Pakistan has been interferring with Afghanistan long before then; their support of the Taliban is interference; why don't you mention that?
                      [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                      2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                        because Taliban are killing more Afghans than they are.
                        UN statistics are obviously going to serve the agenda of the West which I can predict you use.

                        The fact of the matter is, the insurgency primarily exists due to the NATO war/occupation.

                        The NATO/Karzai occupation is the source of instability and the barrier to peace.

                        Therefore, all Afghan civilian deaths (100%) are due to the NATO war/occupation
                        Last edited by Shah-i-Kot; 05-11-2012, 03:29 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                          Pakistan has been interferring with Afghanistan long before then; their support of the Taliban is interference; why don't you mention that?

                          All governments in the world want to be recognized.

                          Pakistan has been a critical supporter of the NATO war/Karzai regime.

                          Without this support, the war/Karzai regime is more difficult in going forward,

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Pukhton Yaar View Post
                            Ahhhh really nice question
                            You know Pakistan is one of the biggest ally of US and Saudi, You know that Alqaeda was the guest and great supporter in Afghanistan during Taliban government, Saudi which was anti Alqaeda recognized Taliban government who was providing safe heaven to alqaeda,
                            you know Usama the alqaeda leader was in Pakistan but Pakistan is the best friend of Saudi, so how Pakistan can provide shelter to the enemy of Saudi?
                            and you know that Saudi and US are great allies in the region and their deep stratigic policies are same.
                            you know Saudi helped US in occupation of labia, Iraq and now Syria,
                            You know alqaeda was in Sudan before, and then America divided that Sudan, Now they are collecting alqaeda in Yaman, and after some attacks on alqaeda they will occupy Yaman as well.
                            The same way they used in the occupation of Afghanistan, they sent alqaeda there, They sent Taliban there with help of ISI and financial support of Saudi, then they asked Tabliban to give Usama to them but ISI understood Taliban not to give Usama so that there will be a reason for US to attack Afghanistan.
                            so this is a sequential long chain.
                            Now US, ISI and Saudi supports Tabliban, because if there is no Taliban, if there is no fight so there will be no reason for US to stay here.
                            You know Taliban are attacking just Local people they don't attack the big and wide Bases of Americans, When afghan forces captures some taliban, US forces taking those Taliban from them and then free them from prison to join in fight again.
                            Why Afghan government was emphasizing on Bagram Jail to be handed over to them, because they know that Americans letting Taliban be free of prison, and that's why they were not given Bagram Jail to Afghan forces.
                            US better knows the Centers of Taliban getting training in many centers in Pakistan but they do let them to get trained and then cross the border.
                            But when true mujahideen attacks on Americans then they taking very soon action and taking revenge.
                            I can not explain this in English very well but I can do in Pashto.

                            Hey,

                            Masood and Rabbani invited OBL to Afghanistan to act as a mediator for them to the Taliban who at the time were taking over. Masood and Rabbani had retreated away from much of Afghanistan

                            Thats a fact.

                            When the Taliban took over Kabul, they found OBL there. It appears they at first did not know what to do with him. He was a problem for them, especially when he did interviews with ABC/CNN, and they tried to restrict his movement, as has become clear from various news reports.

                            Now, it is a documented fact that Pakistan told the Taliban to hand over OBL from the moment they found him there right up until the last second before NATO war began. Remember that tense period between 9/11 and the start of the war. Oh, it doesn't fit in your narrative does it?? Again, its documented. This by no means shows that Pakistan wanted to save Afghans from war, but the fact is no country wants or will tolerate a war going on in the region. Its out of question, and is why regional consensus is against the occupation. The region will have its way.

                            Pakistan has been supporting the NATO war/Karzai regime.

                            The Karzai regime is not the Afghan government and nor does it represent the Afghan people in any legal capacity or actual capacity. As there is an occupation, no installed government is legal. It has no control beyond a small part of Kabul, and not even there.

                            In either case, the foreign interference in the region which primarily began in 1953 with the Western backed coup of Mossadeq is the reason terrorism arose in the first place.

                            Oil politics.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by lynx View Post
                              Hi Pakthun Yar

                              Do you agree with Pakistan support for the NATO war/Karzai regime with supply routes?

                              I don't like Pakistan to support NATO but Yeah I realize that Pakistan(Punjabistan) support NATO and US, not just in routes but in other deep strategic plans and policies to occupy other central Asian countries and their wide economic resources which are now under Russian control, As pakistan and Saudi helped US to get out South Union from the region, Since that time that cold war is in progress, as Pakistan was supporting Mujaheddin with help of US to defeat South Union, That deep strategic alliance of Pakistan and US is still continuous and now they are supporting Talibaan and alqaeda to find a reason for occupying many other countries rich of mine and natural resources.
                              already they have sent many Uzbek, Chechen, Arabic and Punjabi Taliban to Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and other countries and to the north provinces of Afghanistan neighboring those countries with the help of their Helo copters which have seen by many regional local people.
                              As it was earlier British empire rule when they were deciding to occupy a country they were providing transportation ways and routes to there to supply their supporting materials and conveys by that way during war.
                              the same method they are using now and the illegal son of earlier British (Punjabistan) is helping them as they were helping British before.
                              and that's why England have made Punjabistan in region to help them in future plans.
                              Do you agree that Pakistan should permit drone attacks on FATA?


                              NO Why I have to be agree with some one killing my innocent nation, But it is reality that Punjabistan and the Black Network ISI is not just agree but participated in this bloody crime or Pashtuns genocide, and they have provided them Airports in Baluchistan and Sindh for that drones.
                              But you have to know that they are not killing their own agents with that drones, they are killing innocent people and the true people who want freedom from Punjab but showing to world that we are bombing the centers of Taliban but in fact they are informing Taliban prier to attack to leave the site and go to a safe place.
                              [RIGHT][SIZE=4]********************[/SIZE][SIZE=5]
                              [COLOR=Red]په ښه خوي له بدخواهانو بې پروا یم[/COLOR][COLOR=Red]
                              په نرمۍ لکه اوبه د اور ســـــــزا یم
                              ـــــ
                              ټیټ مې مه بوله غورځنګ راباندې مه کړه
                              زه پدې افتادګۍ کې لـــــــــــوي ګړنګ یــم
                              ـــــ
                              لکه ونه مستقیم په خپل مکان یم
                              که خزان راباندې راشي که بهار[/COLOR]
                              [/SIZE][/RIGHT]

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by shadowgoverner

                                نه مړه دا هسی خبری دي.
                                دوی اخپله تا په غلط فکرون
                                و کښی اچوې.
                                ای اس ای د امریکی خلک دی او ورته په رکو دې.
                                ته یا د دنیا نه نه یی خبر او یا د ټولی کیسی نه ځان نه غواړی خبر کړی
                                ما خپل تحقیق کړی دی او زه هغه دغه پروپاګن نه منم.
                                ته دی تحقیق د سر نه شرو که ، خو دا وار غټ عکس ته وګوره
                                .
                                دا خو زه هم وایم چې اي ایس ايي د امریکې خلک دي او طالبان د اي ایس اي خلک دي نو طالبان هم په غیر مستقیم ډول د امریکې خلک دي او دا د امریکې سعودي او پنجابستان شریک پلان دی، او دا هغه حقیقت دی چې هیڅوک ترینه انکار نشي کولاي، څوک چې ترې انکار کوي یا به پنجابی وي، یا به د ايي ایس ايي سړي وي او یا به لیونی وي۰
                                تا به تحقیق کړی وي خو خطاء شوی یې او یا بل چا تیر باسلی یې، ته ووایه چې غټ عکس نور څه دی؟؟؟
                                خو بې دلیله او بې ثبوته د چا دلایلو ته پروپاګند ویل یواځې د ایجنټانو کار وي، زه غواړم پښتانه بیدار کړم او په حقیقت یې پوه کړم خو ته حقیقت پټوې، غواړې خلک همداسې غولیدلي پاتې وي ترڅو د همیش لپاره د پنجابیانو د لوبو ګوډیانې او د قربانۍ ګډوري وي، هسې پدې ویلو چې دا خوشې خبرې دی یا پروپاګند دی یا یې نه منم نو پدې کار هیڅ شی هم نه ثابتیږي، کڅوک غواړي د چا خبره رد کړي باید دلیل ووايي او سم صیح منطقي عقلي استدلال وکړي. او کنه نو دا د ماشومانو خبرې دي چې دا منم او دا نه منم، دا مې خوښ دی او هاغه مې نه دی خوښ۰
                                ته هم په حقیقت ښه پوه یې خو هسې ضد کوې، او یا همدغه دنده درسپارل شوې ده

                                په انګریزۍ دې پوه نه شوم چې کله پرې پوه شوم ځواب به یې درکړم
                                ۰
                                [RIGHT][SIZE=4]********************[/SIZE][SIZE=5]
                                [COLOR=Red]په ښه خوي له بدخواهانو بې پروا یم[/COLOR][COLOR=Red]
                                په نرمۍ لکه اوبه د اور ســـــــزا یم
                                ـــــ
                                ټیټ مې مه بوله غورځنګ راباندې مه کړه
                                زه پدې افتادګۍ کې لـــــــــــوي ګړنګ یــم
                                ـــــ
                                لکه ونه مستقیم په خپل مکان یم
                                که خزان راباندې راشي که بهار[/COLOR]
                                [/SIZE][/RIGHT]

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X