Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pukhtuns ---Futuristic Scenario

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pukhtuns ---Futuristic Scenario

    This is year 2014. NATO forces are leaving Afghanistan and with that a new strategic policy has started emerging in South Asia focused on containing, checking, and reverting state-sponsored Islamist militancy emanating from Pakistan and Afghanistan (south) through support to indigenous movements for self-determination . The consequences of the new policy are seen in the north of Afghanistan and Baluchistan where movement for Khurasan and Greater Baluchistan gain momentum.

    Through arbitration and intervention of Pakistan's ISI, Islamist militants, Mullah Omar, Jalauddin Haqqani, and Gulbuddin Hikmatyar agree to power sharing and rise to power in their respective zones of influence e.g., Kandahar, Loya Paktiya, and Kunar. A combined force of Islamist warriors guided and logistically supported by Pakistan's military establishment advances on Kabul but is beaten back by Northern Alliance backed by Russia, India, Iran, EU, US, and Central Asian states. On the other hand, as a result of new geo-strategic game, Baluch insurgency intensifies to an uncontrollable limit for Pakistani military to eliminate. Baluch struggle and right to self determination gain international diplomatic and political backing. Through active support from key global and regional powers, Baluchis are able to declare the establishment of Baluch state in a small region of Baluchistan. Major powers and UN pressure Pakistani establishment to accept the right of Baluchi people to self-rule through a new constitution based on a con-federal structure but Punjabi resists.

    Fearing disintegration, the Pakistani Punjabi establishment attacks India to consolidate national sentiments and infuse cohesion but is defeated. The battle with India involves small-scale nuclear exchange. With this, Pakistani military as well as state start disintegrating. All this happens between 2014 and 2022.

    The consequence of the events for Pashtuns is that Pashtun areas have completely been gripped by anarchy. Islamist militants associated with Mullah Omar, Haqqani, and Gulbuddin through tacit approval from ISI have killed a large number of moderate Pashtun leaders in Afghanistan's south. The remaining leaders have migrated to Pukhtunkhwa, Afghanistan's north (now Khurasan), Dubai, India, West, and other countries to escape persecution at the hands of Taleban.

    To deal with this situation, a grand Pashtun jirga is held at Grassy Ground in Mongora, Swat attended by major Pashtun political leaders, influential figures, factions, and parties. A coalition of peace is formed comprising ex-PPP leaders, PPP (Sherpao), ANP, PMAP, and JUI, etc. Hamid Karzai is made the head of this coalition. The coalition signs a declaration to end anarchy on Pashtun land and establish order and stability. A security force is formed comprising the Pashtun officers and soldiers of ex Pakistan Army and Afghan National Army. General Zarar Batur Khan is appointed commander of the new Pashtun Army. A Pashtun police force is also established under the command of Sohail Tajik.

    According to the policy of the Coalition of Peace, a delegation is sent to Mullah Omar, Haqqani, and Hikmat to lure them to negotiating table and persuade them on a power-sharing formula and system based on democracy, moderation, and friendly neighborly relations with powers in the vicinity. But the members of the delegation are killed in cold-blood by militants through orders from Mullah Omar. The Coalition of Peace declares war on Mullah Omar, Haqqani, and Gulbuddin and their militant gangs. In response, the warlords form a Coalition of Islamist Jehad comprising Taleban, Haqqani network, Gulbuddin faction, Aymen Al Zawahiri, and other terrorist and extremist outfits e.g., Lashkar-i-Islami, Al-Qaueda, etc. Mullah Omar is chosen the supreme head of the coalition and emir of the new Emirate. International Islamist activists, Akhwanis, and Al-Qaueda sympathizers also extend support to the Coalition of Jehad and flock to Kandahar to bolster the Jehadi lashkar of the Emirate of Mullah Omar.

    Crucial role is played by Islamist ideologues in diaspora to garner support for Omar`s Emirate. A die-hard member of Akhwanul Muslimin Barakzai Abdali takes the charge of the foreign minister of the Emerat of Mullah Omar and tries to win it international support. A special assassination squad is raised by Mullah Omar and Haqqani of which Maiwand Al-Afghani is appointed the commander. The task of this squad is to eliminate moderate Pashtun leadership in KP and rest of Pashtun Land through assassination and destroy schools and universities engaged in secular education. A renown diaspora Jehadi Manzareh is appointed political adviser to Mullah Omar.

    Renown PF militant Ghundal is entrusted with the job to organize suicide training camps and force. A number of other Pashtun and non-Pashtun e.g. SG, Al-Desert, Al-Zaif join the assassination squads and suicide training centers run by Al-Afghani and Ghundal.

    The Coalition of Peace declares war on the Coalition of Jehad. General Zarar Batur Khan divides the Pashtun Army in three forces; the northern flank under the command of Major General Affaq Khan Yousafzai advances to Jalalabad via Nawa Pass and Kunar whereas General Hamza Khan Tokhi advances on the most difficult front of Haqqani in Loya Paktiya through Waziristan. The southern flank of the Pashtun Army marches on Kandahar via Chaman under the command of Maj Gen Amir Khan Kakar.

    Many pitched battles are fought between the Coalition of Peace and Coalition of Jehad and stiif resistance is offered by the insurgents. The assassination squad and suicide force under the command of Maiwand and Gundal wreak havoc on Pashtun populace and kills many key leaders in south and east Afghanistan and destroys most of the educational infrastructure. But they are defeated at the Waziristan and Jalabad front. Suicide training camps run by Gundal in Jalabad are destroyed by the advancing army. The triumphant forces under Affaq Khan and Hamza Khan join those of Amir Khan Kakar and a final assault is made on Kandahar the capital of the Emirate of Mullah Omar.

    A fierce battle takes place in which the army of Mullah Omar is routed. Masses also rise in revolt against the repressive regime of Mullah Omar and helps the truimphant army of the Coalition of Peace, which steps ahead and quickly restores order in Kandahar, Ghazni, Helmand, and Farah. Barakzai makes his last-ditch effort and pleads with the Wahabi state of Saudi Arabia to save the Emirate of Mullah Omar but to no avail. It is beyond the control of the Wahabi state of Saudi Arabia to ignore UN resolutions and salvage the international image of the Emirate.

    A search is launched by the truimphant Pukhtun forces to find Ghundal, Maiwand Al-Afghani, and other militants and bring them to justice. Ghundal is captured while trying to escape in the guise of an old woman in burqa through Kandahar airport. Other Jehadis like Maiwand, Al-Desert, Al-Zaif, Al-Zawahiri, are also arrested from the tomb of Ahmad Shah Babab through tips from Pashtun masses. Barakzai Abdali resigns from his post as foreign minister of the Emirate of Mullah Omar and seeks asylum in Saudi Arabia but that is refised. The new Pashtun state gets Barakzai Abdali through Interpole. Manzareh is killed in action.

    Foreign jehadis like Al-desert, Zawahiri, Al-Zaif are sent to their respective countries where they are hanged for spreading mayhem and destruction on the land of Allah. Ghundal and Maiwand are sent to International Court of Justice at Hague to face charges as war criminals. Barakzai turns state witness on Ghundal and Maiwand Al-Afghani in return for exemption from criminal cases and permission to practice veternary medicine in Kandahar as a witch doctor. Ghundal and Al-Afghani are sentenced to life imprisonment without payroll for crimes against humanity and running suicide camps and assassination squads by the court.

    Pashtun state is consolidated and Hamid Karzai becomes its first president and Mahmud Khan first prime minister. General Zarar Batur Khan, Gen Hamza Khan, Gen Affaq Khan, and Gen Amir Khan are declared national hero and awarded highest medals of the land.


    Note: The characters in this story are fictional.
    Last edited by DaMalakandGhar; 03-13-2012, 09:13 AM.

  • #2
    And what role does Roadrunner have? UN peace negotiator?

    Comment


    • #3
      . Fearing disintegration, the Pakistani Punjabi establishment attacks India to boost national sentiments and cohesion and is defeated .
      Obviously
      .

      Comment


      • #4
        This month's issue of GQ contains an exclusive account of the 20-hour assault on the U.S. embassy in Kabul last September. As the article shows, the attack—though militarily unsuccessful—was a public relations victory for the Taliban. In February, excerpts from a classified NATO report were leaked in the press that further undermined the official U.S. military line on the war. GQ has obtained a copy of the secret report, which contains a frank assessment of the Taliban, their ties to Pakistan, and their prospects for victory over the Afghan government.

        PART I: What the Report Means
        The report, "State of the Taliban: January 6, 2012," is part of a regularly published series on the insurgency that's based on the interrogations of thousands of detainees. It offers an unvarnished glimpse into the inner beliefs of the military establishment in Afghanistan for two reasons: First, as a classified document, it was intended solely for internal consumption, and second, it was put together by a special operations team working under the Joint Special Operations Command, which is responsible for the US military's most secretive and demanding special forces missions, including the one that killed Osama bin Laden last year.

        The special operations team that authored the report, known as Joint Task Force 3-10, allegedly helps oversee a "black site" prison at the largest US military base in the country, located at Bagram air base, just north of Kabul. In the introduction, the report describes how it was put together:

        "Throughout the year, TF 3-10 conducted over 27,000 interrogations of over 4,000 Taliban, Al Qaeda, foreign fighters and civilians. As this document is derived directly from insurgents, it should be considered informational and not necessarily analytical."
        While, as the authors note, the report is intended to be a presentation of the information they've gathered from detainees, in certain passages it clearly includes their own views and analysis. And though the 'black sites' operated by the CIA and special forces in Afghanistan have in the past been associated with detainee abuse, overall the interrogators seem notably sympathetic to the detainees' motivations and understanding of Afghan politics and culture.

        1. Who are the Taliban?
        The report is remarkable for its clear-eyed view of the insurgency, a far cry from the caricature that often features in military press releases. Rather than merciless fanatics, the Taliban are portrayed as a nuanced and complex phenomenon — one deeply involved in violence and criminality, but also pragmatic and evolving, with a deep base of support among ordinary Afghans. It portrays them as motivated both by nationalistic and religious grounds:

        "[Afghan government] corruption, abuse of power and suspected lack of commitment to Islam continue to provoke significant anti-government sentiment. The Taliban will be hostile to any government which appears to act as an agent of foreign powers to instill Western values."
        The report makes clear the distinction between the Taliban and Al-Qaeda, whose influence is seen as dissipating under the pressure of military strikes and the loss of much of its core leadership:

        "In most regions of Afghanistan, Taliban leaders have no interest in associating with Al Qaeda. Working with Al Qaeda invites targeting, and Al Qaeda personnel are no longer the adept and versatile fighters and commanders they once were. Even Taliban groups with historically close ties to Al Qaeda, such as the Haqqani Network, have had little or no interaction with them in the last two years."
        Regarding the Haqqani Network—which was accused by US officials of being behind the attack on the embassy—the report also tones down much of the hype about the Haqqanis being a distinct and uniquely dangerous force—the so-called "Sopranos of the Afghanistan war"—stating that the group is deeply linked with the rest of the Taliban:

        "Though the Haqqani Network maintains its own identity and history, it remains an integral part of the Taliban. Haqqani Network personnel changes, areas of responsibility, funding, operations , and strategy are directed by the Taliban leadership in Quetta, Pakistan."
        As the report notes, the term 'Haqqani Network' is not even used by its members:

        "The Haqqani Network will not independently reconcile, nor are they authorized to act as spokesmen for the Taliban as a whole. Haqqani Network members refer to themselves only as Taliban. The term Haqqani Network is unknown within the group."
        2. Who funds the Taliban?
        The report puts to rest the oft-repeated idea of "ten-dollar Taliban," that is, that the insurgency is largely composed of poor Afghan men who are bribed in order to fight. "The Taliban do not fight for financial gain," it states. "Almost without exception, Taliban members do not receive salaries or other financial incentives for their work."

        The largest source of the insurgency's funding, according to the report, comes from donations collected door-to-door in Pakistan and Afghanistan, as well as from wealthy Arab donors in the Gulf region. It downplays direct Taliban involvement in the narcotics trade, but notes that they do collect taxes from opium production in regions they control. It also states that corruption fed by international spending helps fund the insurgency.

        3. Is the Taliban winning or losing?
        The report's authors do appear to believe that the US-led military strategy has been having an effect on the insurgency, pressuring many of them to downgrade their operations or go to ground in Pakistan. Unsurprisingly, they see the kill-capture campaign as playing a key role:

        "Unrelenting, pinpoint ISAF operations targeting specific command elements have had a demonstrable effect on the insurgents' ability to conduct operations."
        At the same time however, there is a sense that, despite the vast number of insurgents who've been killed or captured, the Taliban's momentum remains unchecked.

        "Though the Taliban suffered severely in 2011, its strength, motivation, funding , and tactical proficiency remains intact. [...] Despite numerous tactical setbacks, surrender is far from their collective mindset. [...] As opposed to years past, detainees have become more confident in not only their potential to win, but the virtue of their cause."
        Indeed, the report is far more pessimistic about the Afghan government:

        "Many Afghans are already bracing themselves for an eventual return of the Taliban. [The Afghan government] continues to declare its willingness to fight, yet many of its personnel have secretly reached out to insurgents, seeking long-term options in the event of a possible Taliban victory. The Taliban recognize this trend and formalized a reconciliation system of their own."
        4. How does Pakistan help the Taliban?
        The report levels harsh accusations of Pakistani cooperation with the insurgency, specifically with the country's Inter-Services Intelligence agency, noting that "senior Taliban leaders meet regularly with ISI personnel who advise on strategy and relay any pertinent concerns of the Government of Pakistan."

        At the same time though, the report is more cautious when it comes to the nature of the link between the ISI and the Taliban:

        "Despite widespread open-source reports to the contrary, detainees have provided little evidence of direct ISI funding of Taliban operations or training of Taliban personnel. Similarly, there have been no credible reports from detainees in 2011 of ISI directly providing weapons to the Taliban. Rather, the majority of ISI support appears to be through intermediaries."


        Read More http://www.gq.com/news-politics/big-...#ixzz1p02z77Wc

        The fact is that these militant groups have an existence independent of the Pakistani government in the border areas, where in many cases they enjoy deep sympathy among and roots within the local population. Nor would substantial logistical from an outside party support be necessary to maintain their low-intensity guerilla operations and occasional high-profile attacks.

        5. Why is Pakistan helping the Taliban?
        The report offers the common refrain that Pakistan's policy in Afghanistan is largely driven by its longstanding rivalry with its neighbor to the east, India. It therefore seeks to ensure that Afghanistan's government is friendly to itself and hostile to India—criteria that make the administration of Afghan President Hamid Karzai unsatisfactory:

        "Hamid Karzai is perceived as deeply influenced by India, Iran and the West, and therefore a potential strategic threat to Pakistani security. Most detainees believe that Pakistan will continue to overlook any concerns with Afghan-focused insurgent groups, in order to undermine [the Afghan government.]"
        At the same time, however, the report acknowledges that Pakistan has its own legitimate interests in the current conflict. The Pakistani state is deeply threatened by insurgent groups within its borders, particularly the Tehrik-e Taliban-e Pakistan, which has declared war on the government. In order to subdue the trouble in its border areas—which has been inflamed in part by US drone strikes and the war in Afghanistan—it has attempted to co-opt militant groups and direct their energies outwards:

        "The Government of Pakistan has developed an innovative strategy for subduing the TTP through a combination of clandestine diplomacy and intense military action. ISI has directed much of its effort toward undermining the TTP from within, and subsequently redirecting insurgent efforts away from Pakistan."
        6. What about Iran?
        Iran has long been alleged to be playing both sides of the conflict in Afghanistan, which the report makes clear:

        "The Iranians have provided moderate support to what coalition forces refer to as the Herat Insurgent Faction, or "Mujahedin of Martyr Akbari", which is a smaller insurgent group operating primarily in Herat and Badghis Provinces. However, Iran has offered far more support to Farsi-speaking groups, many of which currently support [the government of Afghanistan], rather than pro-Taliban elements."
        PART II: The Annotated Excerpts from the Report
        The US and NATO have suffered from a long series of damaging and embarrassing leaks over the years in Afghanistan, from the massive Wikileaks cache, to Ambassador Karl Eikenberry's infamous 2008 memo, to, most recently, a top-secret cable supposedly so sensitive that Ambassador Ryan Crocker sent it via the CIA rather than normal diplomatic channels to the US (where its contents were soon leaked to the Washington Post by military sources hoping to make the case for prolonging the troop deployments.)

        There have been rumors that the military has instituted a form of leak-tracing technology that embeds a unique, invisible code in each copy of a document. There is reason to believe that this might be the case with the State of the Taliban Report, so we've copied out certain passages, and re-created key images, in order to give you a direct look without potentially compromising our source. (The New York Times copied out the full text here, out of the same concerns.) We've also redacted certain information that might compromise sensitive military details or the privacy of individual detainees.

        The Maps
        The report includes several satellite images that are meant to illustrate the nature of cooperation between Pakistani security forces and the Taliban. Using the grid coordinates provided in the report, we were able to find open-source satellite imagery of the same areas. We've also reprinted the captions from the report, but we've redacted the coordinates.


        A Pakistani Army Border Checkpoint. Taliban personnel report stopping for "tea and snacks" with border guards, as they transit into Afghanistan to fight. North Waziristan Agency, PK (exact coordinates redacted)
        This image shows a Pakistani Army border checkpoint on the border between the Afghan province of Khost and the Pakistan agency of North Waziristan (note how the Pakistani border post is shown on the Afghan side of the border.) The caption describes a common complaint that's been voiced both by US military brass and soldiers alike — that they've observed first-hand a cordial relationship between the Pakistani Army and militants. In many cases, Pakistan's Frontier Corp and the Taliban are drawn from the same Pashtun tribal groups that straddle the border, so certainly they will share cultural, if not political, affinities with one another. If, as the US has alleged, attackers on the US embassy came from the Haqqani Network, which is based in North Waziristan, they might very well have used this route, or one like it, to enter Afghanistan.


        Familial Residence and Meeting Location for Haqqani Network Senior Leadership, North Waziristan Agency, PK (exact coordinates redacted)
        The Haqqani family madrassa has a long pedigree going back to the war against the Soviet Union, when it was a locus of mujehadin resistance in the area. Today, the Haqqani Network is alleged to remains closely associated with Pakistan's intelligence service, and the two share an uneasy coexistence in Miram Shah, the capital of North Waziristan, where the madrassa is located.

        The Detainees
        Sprinkled throughout the report are boxes with photos of detainees, along with a snippet from their interrogations. (Again, these are reproductions of the images.):


        • This hapless detainee's tale of woe is increasingly typical of the foreigners who smuggle themselves to Afghanistan with the intent of doing jihad against the US forces there. Al Qaeda's central leadership has been decimated and fractured by US military pressure, and they have little operational ability to field forces in Afghanistan, like they once did. Instead, individuals like this Moroccan-German are more likely to end up with one of the ad-hoc foreign fighter groups that are associated with a small number of Taliban fronts. This individual was picked up in Zabul Province, which is one of the only areas in southern Afghanistan where foreign fighters are active.


        • This is strange because Burhannudin Rabbani is the former leader of the Northern Alliance who was assassinated by a turban-bomb wearing militant last year—in other words, a staunch opponent of the Taliban.

        That being said, in Afghanistan there are almost always a multiplicity of clandestine and confusing ties between ostensible enemies—given the number of different factions, and the constantly shifting alliances, you never know when you may need each other. It's possible that this guy got picked up by the US for being in communication with the insurgency

        In any case, while it may be a little hyperbolic, his warnings about a civil war and a split along regional lines point towards a gloomy possible future for Afghanistan—a repeat of what happened after the Soviets left. We know how that turned out.

        If you're interested in reading more of the report, the New York Times has put up the full document (minus the images), along with some excellent annotations by two of their reporters.



        Read More http://www.gq.com/news-politics/big-...#ixzz1p03hSFHD

        Comment


        • #5


          Detainees Perspective

          A summary of reflection on the current state of insurgency, ISAF operational effectiveness, external influences shaping the Taleban, and their views on ending the war and moving forward.

          Comment


          • #6
            Hahahaha Karzai says his heroes are ghandi and Nehru... When he leads the war all his soldiers will wear Versace and slap like girls (white girls not afghan girls since afghan girl slaps are fierce). They would probably be misinterpreted for cross dressers and given a shot in each buttock and let to live.

            Karzai in mingora? Loool. Kp rurals see him like as a Farsiban "Kabulaay" zardari equivalent.

            I do think a part of my plea deal should include fried chicken at the Hague with some biscuits.
            "2 crackheads don't become any better or stronger by sharing the same crack pipe." - Greatest PF quote

            Comment


            • #7
              No I think when its 2014 US leaves and they drop an atom bom on Afghanistan an Pakistan and then wright a letter that they are sorry. Then they send some major corporotion to steal the Afghan national recources and al those bithces like Maiwand and onthers will make more youtue videos calling for jihad and that's it....

              Comment

              Working...
              X