Robert Pape destroying Sam Harris and Soldat Amir narrative with data/facts

[MostafaM]

don't be silly mostafa. most pashtuns in pakistan are quite happy being pakistani. if they were not they would not be a part of pakistan.

things may change but the way things stand, you'd be wrong both legally and in geographical terms.

Quiet happy are those who don´t mind being undermined culturally, linguistically and historically.

These kinda words always come from people like you who like Shahid Afridi talk that Pashto-Urdu-English-gibberish mix.

Legally, I am definitly not wrong.
Pakistan, as the successor state to British India has to stick to the Durand Treaty OR negotiate the border.

[faye]

Hey listen up Kufar

say it and hear it out yourself : say it : kufrrrrrr. thats what you are BOIIIIII

so who gives a **** what you say? Who is suprised that you are dishonest?

Uncle TOm boy, house negroe

debate properly

here we have the ghandul rant personality. we shall call this the ghundal personality no1.

[Manzareh]

Quiet happy are those who don´t mind being undermined culturally, linguistically and historically.

These kinda words always come from people like you who like Shahid Afridi talk that Pashto-Urdu-English-gibberish mix.

Legally, I am definitly not wrong.
Pakistan, as the successor state to British India has to stick to the Durand Treaty OR negotiate the border.

Its sad how you cannot give your view without the constant need of posting videos to do the explanation for you.

The durrand line issue has been discussed here at PF to the point of saturation.

Why is it not ok for Shahid Afridi to speak Pashto/Urdu, but ok for you to speak Pashto/Farsi.. this is called double standards.

[roadrunner]

The Durand Line was an international treaty that does not have a time limit.

the only question over the Durand line is whether it is nullified because pressure was put on the afghan ruler to sign it. the fact of the matter is, he did.

as far as i see, you're speaking for pashtuns of pakistan and don't seem to be in sink with the reality that they don't mind being part of pakistan.

and manzareh's post about you backing the use of farsi/pashto but not urdu/pashto is right because it makes you a hypocrite.

[MostafaM]

Its sad how you cannot give your view without the constant need of posting videos to do the explanation for you.

The durrand line issue has been discussed here at PF to the point of saturation.

Why is it not ok for Shahid Afridi to speak Pashto/Urdu, but ok for you to speak Pashto/Farsi.. this is called double standards.

The video explains how residents of KPK view this issue.

Its is emberassing for you sell-out Pashtuns like you to see how a real Pashtun mind works. Take an example.

And for your second idiotic arguement:
I speak Pashto and Farsi fluently but don´t mix these languages with each other.
ID-less Pashtuns like you and Shahid Apridey speak a gibberish form of Pashtu-Urdu-English MIX!

Before you reply, you should carefully if you can read.

[MostafaM]

The Durand Line was an international treaty that does not have a time limit.

the only question over the Durand line is whether it is nullified because pressure was put on the afghan ruler to sign it. the fact of the matter is, he did.

as far as i see, you're speaking for pashtuns of pakistan and don't seem to be in sink with the reality that they don't mind being part of pakistan.

and manzareh's post about you backing the use of farsi/pashto but not urdu/pashto is right because it makes you a hypocrite.

1. Did I mention any time limits in my post?
I don´t think si.

2. The question is not about pressure but the legal terms of successor states and the border agreements that they make. The Turkish Republic was the successor state to the Ottoman Empire and was obliged to any agreements that were made on territorial terms that were signed by the Ottomans.
The fact that the Ottoman Empire lost most of it´s territories lies in the revolt of Arab tribes and their right for self-determination.

The question what "free territories" mean in times of modern nation states.

Those free territories can´t exist as territorial entities in modern times, but the Durand Treaty is binding for Pakistan.

It has to be settled to whom these free areas belong.

3. Last time I checked, large parts of FATA and I only speak for the Pashtuns of FATA here, are not very keen to be part of Napakistan.
The Emirate of Waziristan is an example as a challenge to what "Pakistan" wants to be....a viable nation state.

4. Manzareh´s idiotic arguement doesn´t make any sense because he didn´t even understand what I was talking about when I said "Pashto-Urdu-English gibberish MIX".
Hardly any Pashtun mixes English, Farsi or Suaheli into his Pashto in Afghanistan and FATA. But Apridey, Manzareh and roadrunner seem to be one of those Paki-establishment ID-less Pathans who don´t mind to be undermined culturally, linguistically and historically.

People like you are a far greater danger to the Pashtun nation than facists, communists, Ikhwanis or Northern Alliance supporters because you uproot the people from within. It´s easier to deal with an outer enemy than the one from the inside.

But we have you on our radar!
;-)

"Möge das Auge des Feiglings niemals ruhen!"