Amirul Mumineen Mullah Omar Mujahid (hafidhahullah) tells his lifestory in his own vo

[Ghundal]

yeah but you'd lose since Syrian insurgents protect their people not go ahead and kill their people anyways just to get to NATO

ahem and that's why the Syrians are superior to the Taliban.

al7amduilah

Syrian insurgents are not protecting their people. They know Assad will retaliate by attacking their civilian areas, resulting in mass civilian deaths.

Why are they falling for his trap?

Why are these Saudi Wahabis backed , AQ backed, Syrian terrorists who enjoy Kurdish oppressing Turkish safe havens still fighting ? Why are they protesting and endangering Syrian lives? They provoked Assad to retaliate


Provoking Assad! Because they don't care about civilians and want power

[ScimitarXEdge]

already debunked that, the Syrian insurgency was a response to Assad murdering protestors, he would murder them anyways, so their only chance is to fight; The Taliban have been brutalizing Afghans long before the Invasion. and the Taliban would have murdered Afghan civilians anyways with or without NATO; in this case Taliban = Assad

Syrians 10000000 ....Taliban -13874747485858

[Ghundal]

Scimitar,

From now on every statement you make about the Afghan insurgency or any other insurgency, I will just interchange Syrian insurgency with it, and post it back as I see fit.
It's quite ridiculous to see how hypocritical your views are.

So now you support Saudi Wahabi backed/AQ backed Syrian insurgents who are Saudi slaves enjoying Kurdish oppressing Turkish safe havens to attack the Syrian nation?

Your contradictions are a laugh on you .

Not case closed. You don't have a case to begin with

[Ghundal]

already debunked that, the Syrian insurgency was a response murdering protestors; The Taliban have been brutalizing Afghans long before the Invasion.

Syrians 10000000 ....Taliban -13874747485858

Already debunked that, the Afghan insurgency was a response to the foreign occupation, the Saudi Wahabi/AQ backed Syrian insurgency is a brutal movement intent on breaking apart Syria and imposing Wahabism on the people

They enjoy Kurdish oppressing safe havens in Turkey, and AQ terrorist support and financing too - a bunch of terrorist thugs Wahabi slaves

[Ghundal]

Keep on going
I will just compile all of them and put Syrian Wahabi/AQ backed terrorist insurgency for all of them

Smile

[ScimitarXEdge]

that's false because the Taliban existed before the NATO invasion and were already tyrannizing Afghan civilians so they're not a response to NATO, furthermore they attack NATO inspite of KNOWING full well that they will kill Afghan civilians. the Syrians attack Assad because he's attacking attacking civilians.


keep trying to do the little exchanging game, it only works by fabricating and denying reality

Case closed

[Ghundal]

Scimitar,
So an Afghan insurgent whose family died in a NATO airstrikes or who simply wants NATI to withdraw existed before the NATO occupation

So did they imagine that they were occupied and were fighting shadows

All your doing is making unqualified statements

After researching your posts with Barakzai, Alchemist, and Khushal, after you pushed me to find your statements which i did, I realized you resorted to the same erratic nonsense that you are using now when you lost . Psychologically speaking, this is what anally retentive people do

Assad had a peaceful country. The Saudi Wahabi /AQ terrorist backed protests turned violent and he has tried to restore order

These Syrian insurgent terrorists who are funded by Wahabi Saudis and have safe havens in Kurdish oppressing Turkey are creating disorder and breaking the law of Syria

The erratic behavior is retarded. You do this with everyone because you want to be right

I have showed your contradictions


Now keep babbling on about your contradictions and keep making unqualified statements and continue to be dishonest

You can argue with your own shadow enemy like you think the Afghan insurgency did before

[ScimitarXEdge]

Ah but the Afghan insurgent deliberately kills other Afghans when he sees a NATO soldier in civilian areas as you admitted so his claim of being motivated to do that by NATO airstrikes isnt credible because if he cared about Afghan lives he'd use more clever tactics like ambushing NATO when they're alone.

The Syrians attack the Assad regime either WHEN They attack civilians or when they're away from civilian areas.


Your argument is once again falsified, in just two lines

[Ghundal]

Furthermore, what you essentially have done is assigned the moral imperative to NATO as an occupying force in regards to the Afghan insurgency, and assigned the moral imperative to the Saudi Wahabi/AQ backed Syrian insurgency against the Syrian Assad government.

The contradiction is blatant and the hypocrisy.

There is no way you can reconcile the two unless you support both NATO war in Afghanistan and you support the Saudi Wahabi/ AQ backed Syrian insurgent terrorists in Syria.

This is called being a sheer hypocrite.

[Ghundal]

Scimitar,

Why are you not objecting to the Saudi Wahabi backed/AQ supported Syrian insurgent terrorist activity in Syria against the Syrian people?

[ScimitarXEdge]

This is false I'm fully aware that NATO kills civilians, uses civilians as shields and deliberate WANT Taliban to kill civilians.

I am also aware the Taliban know this, but do it ANYWAYS; this means Afghan lives were not the concern, Power and evil is.


Real Insurgents, fight FOR their people NOT against....duh.

The Syrian insurgents DO just that, and that is what defines legitimacy here.

[Ghundal]

Ah but the Afghan insurgent deliberately kills other Afghans when he sees a NATO soldier in civilian areas as you admitted so his claim of being motivated to do that by NATO airstrikes isnt credible because if he cared about Afghan lives he'd use more clever tactics like ambushing NATO when they're alone.

The Syrians attack the Karzai regime either WHEN They attack civilians or when they're away from civilian areas.


Your argument is once again falsified, in just two lines

Your being stupid and a hypocrite


Ah but the Syrian insurgent deliberately kills other Syrians when he sees a Syrian soldier in civilian areas as you admitted so his claim of being motivated to do that by Syrian Assad airstrikes isnt credible because if he cared about syrian lives he'd use more clever tactics like ambushing Syrian Assad forces when they're alone.

The Afghan insurgents attack the Assad regime either WHEN They attack civilians or when they're away from civilian areas.


Your argument is once again falsified, in just two lines [QUOTE]

Dishonesty works both ways .

Your just becoming stupid

You still didn't address the Pape data Barakzai told you to address months ago.

Remember what Pape says or was getting confronted by facts such a horrible thing for you?

Your a waste of time.

I can keep changing my words but now your just going on because you don't like losing, and you certainly don't like being shown your contradictions.


Your being an idiot, and you have contradicted yourself continuously

[JAMALUDEEN]

Nato, Arabs or Taleban.. or whoever..

There is no justification for killing innocent civilians. The end does not justify the mean.. Anyone argues for any sides.. is mentally ill.

[ScimitarXEdge]

apparently it only works one way since you'e ignoring that syrians are rising up against a tyrant; whee as Taliban ARE the Tyrants

[ScimitarXEdge]

see that Ghundal,you're mentally ill.