Criminalism within Afghanistan

[Ghundal]

If Afghan "insurgency" is fully supported by Napaki Army, then where are the advanced weapon capabilities?

The US/NATO alliance that props up the expat karzai regime is one of the most highly advanced ones in terms of weapons and technology

Is Pakistan the reason this 50 nation alliance has failed?

A retard Is the one who does not object to Pakistan support for the US war. Without Pakistan support, there is no USwar

It is not that hard to understand

[khushal]

That is another side of the story, and a seperate one, Khushal.

It is tied to it. Ghundal has a point.

First you claim that the Taliban is armed by pakistan, he claims so is NATO and the Afghan government, they get their supplies through pakistan, the difference is that the losing side gets the more advanced hardware.

Second you claim that pakistan gives sanctuary to the taliban, he claims so is NATO who flies drones from pakistani air bases and flies other military aircraft over pakistani airspace.

My question is why is the side that is militarily inferior winning. Its more than obvious that there is something wrong with NATO and the afghan government.

So stop blaming pakistan for the incompetence of the afghan government because they support both sides, not just one side.

[Amir al Ghaznavi]

Cmon guys...there are opinions and there are facts. This is a simple issue there should be a consensus on.

Without Pakistan, there would still be an insurgency. This is a fact, because this is the very nature of Afghans, to resist foreign occupation

However, it is also indisputable that the insurgency would not be as effective without Pakistani support. Pakistani support for the Taliban is an undeniable fact

Is this support unconditional and full throttle? No

Its that simple guys...

[Amir al Ghaznavi]

And one more thing, lets not act like massive carpet bombing and 400,000 American troops wouldnt end this insurgency tomorrow...

[Ghundal]

They have done massive carpet bombing . They have also used depleted uranium. They also have over 200,000 contractors , do all together that's 400000

And they have lost

[khushal]

it would end it but it is no long term solution. the insurgency would prop up again as soon as the troops are gone. That surge in helmond accomplished nothing, the taliban are back. and the american economy cant keep 100,000 soldiers for a long time let alone 400,000. the problem is the incompetence of the afghan government who does not work for the afghan people. you create a government that actually works for the people, you dont even need one american soldier to stamp out the insurgency.

When you cant figure it out and come to the conclusion that leads you to carpet bomb a rural civilian population, its better to leave and admit defeat than destroy what you want to conquer.

[NokiaWnW]

I love all people of Afghanistan and have close intimate ties with all ethnic groups...but the Shamal need to get their act together, because they wont come out on top if shiiit pops off....im saying this out of love....when blood spills, itll spill in the north not south

More than half of million people are displaced in the south and north due the enviroment, force by warlords and war. One thing you need to forget. The old days when the government controlled all weapons and only the army and private militias of the royal family had the privilegs to have weapons are already over. Today, nearly every household has many weapons. Never wish a war in the north because the ethnical devision is to much deep than expected and the post-Taliban decade unified more and more the northerners, specially because of the Taliban threat. It would only victimize those who are innocent and helpless. Just read the Human Rights reports what they have written about the people in the north. But in general north and south suffer. The only one who profite from a war would be the warlords and the militias. In fact, there is already a small but bloody civil war running in the police and army, in some districts and provinces, in some political positions.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/23/magazine/bad-guys-vs-worse-guys-in-afghanistan.html?pagewanted=all

[NokiaWnW]

well as i said the world is full of the simple and stupid .

he has done nothing for afghanistan and also nothing for his city .


just ask arround how many people tried to build up something in herat or in farah , economical and business wise , no single iranian has to pay traffic on their goods they import to afghanistan .

your ismael khar , is just too much of an iranian amu , opening the border and for dancing with the koss keshs in theran .

he was also responisbly for the adoment of terrasing the helmand river , so it could be used for electricity and a water resoiver , for aqua planting .

why ? because the iranian use this water .


so ghandul keep some where else looking for heros my small american friend

Go to Herat and see it. Herat is called ''Afghanistan´s Dubai'' because of Ismael Khan. You talk out of your back lol maybe you are a Pakistani. Who knows.

[NokiaWnW]

If Afghan "insurgency" is fully supported by Napaki Army, then where are the advanced weapon capabilities?

The US/NATO alliance that props up the expat karzai regime is one of the most highly advanced ones in terms of weapons and technology

Is Pakistan the reason this 50 nation alliance has failed?

A retard Is the one who does not object to Pakistan support for the US war. Without Pakistan support, there is no USwar

It is not that hard to understand

Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

read the following and have a bit shame!

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/feb/09/afghanistan-best-way-peace/?pagination=false

''The Pakistani military analysts and Riaz Mohammad Khan share the belief that a Taliban capture of Kabul and the north is impossible. Moreover, sensible Pakistani officers do not want the Taliban to conquer the whole of Afghanistan, because they would then be free to turn on Pakistan by giving their support to their Pashtun brothers who are in revolt against Pakistan as part of the Pakistani Taliban (Tehreek-e- Taliban Pakistan, or TTP).''

Thatmeans that Pak´s support for Taliban will be in future limited.