LZ,
In Sharia, there is no sovreignty. If people choose Sharia, it means they do not want people to be in a position to decide what is halal or haraam or to make laws
So how does a secularist endorse the idea of theocracy under the notion of "people's sovreignty?"
?
In Sharia, there is no sovreignty. If people choose Sharia, it means they do not want people to be in a position to decide what is halal or haraam or to make laws
So how does a secularist endorse the idea of theocracy under the notion of "people's sovreignty?"
?

Comment