Afghanistan belongs to Pakistan.

[Digital Malang]

Afghanistan Belongs To Pakistan Says ISI - YouTube

[badmash_khel]

[graveyardofempires]

this guy is feeding on propaganda created by failed karzai government etc.

now he is compensating on it.

this guy claims he fought agains soviets?lol
these types of people were only running into area to put zia ul haq posters on walls like the one i saw in thos etimes in jalalabad.

cant stop laughing at his good and bad taliban story.

this guy truelly has shizophrenia

[Ghundal]

17 Pak soldiers were kidnapped the other day

I think this guy lives in a dream world

[Digital Malang]

thats what happens when you mix too many drinks on Christmas day.

[Talal]

dude pressTV, zaid hamid and youtube is one helluva bad combination ....Believe it !

[Admin Khan]

PressTV + Zaid Hamid = LOL

I might as well also start making Youtube videos claiming Iran, China and Pakistan are part of Afghanistan since it was Afghan blood which defeated the soviets. Truly 'lol' material.

[al-arab]

What ridicules nonsense. This is not even funny but tragic. It would be the same as an american rat claiming that usa is the oldest civilization in the world.

Who pays this guy? Rafidah iran and zionist israel? Or is he a puppet of the americans? Are the "Pakistanis" (Pakistanis of non-Pashtun origin) here not ashamed of such comments?

This remains me of comments made by rafidah iran about Iraq. Brother graveyardofempires warned me about the iranian press tv and what do I see today. An interview with an iranian rat from the Iraqi puppet government saying completely lies and opposite of what he said to Al-Jazeera when he was confronted by an Sunni Iraqi. His name is Saad al-Muttalabi. He remains me of this guy in the video thas is posted in this thread.

[Levanaye Zalmaye]

"Since 1975.. Pakistan has (had) a very strong stake in Afghanistan...... the ISI has a strategic stake.."

Agreed 100%. And that stake includes keeping Afghanistan a state that cannot stands on its own feet so that its iridescent claims die. For a Punjabi to support this is a matter of common sense. However, what is saddening is that many Pashtuns also support this view that Islamabad should control Kabul through the Taliban. They don't realize that this is detrimental to their own Pashtun national interest.

And Zaid Hamid also touches upon the "defense of political Islam" theory that Pakistan should encourage theocratic dictatorships in Afghanistan for the sake of Islam. So to oppose the Pakistani's interference in Afghanistan is, in effect, opposing Islam. How about if Mr. Zaid Hamid begins at home and cleans up the brothels in Islamabad and Lahore first?

lol and CIA+RAW made the TTP!

[Ghundal]

^ Pakistans support for the US war and recognition of Karzai nullifies everything you just stated

[Levanaye Zalmaye]

^ Pakistans support for the US war and recognition of Karzai nullifies everything you just stated

To date, Pakistan has not attacked or even contained any militant group that is involved in Afghanistan and has agreed not to attack the Pakistani armed forces. They include the Mullah Nazir group, Hafiq Gul Bahadur's group, the Haqqani Network, the Hekmatyaar group and the Mullah Omar Shura (among others).

That's hardly supporting a war. Especially if whatever little you do translates into dollars, the Pakistani's biggest weakness.

Whose 10th account are you again?

[Ghundal]

Pakistan has been supporting the US war and occupation of Afghanistan with critical supply routes and air bases. This action of theirs is logically the only means they are interfering in Afghanistan. Without this support, this war was next to impossible as the supply routes are deemed critical

Pakistan has listened to the US requests before, starting a war in Waziristan. The result of this was a Pakistani defeat in in which they lost over 5000 soldiers

Pakistans support for the US war was one of the reasons groups like TTP came to be

Pakistan is not going to start another civil war at the request of the US. Supporting the US war goes against their interests

Lastly, just because regional nations like China, Pakistan, and Iran are opposed to the US presence, it means nothing at all to the rural Afghan who is just as much opposed to the US occupation

Nothing at all

Comprende?

[Ghundal]

For example, Russia and Chinas opposition to the US occupation of Vietnam made no difference to the Vietnamese opposition. Obviously, it was a plus, but support or lack of support made no difference to Minh

Does that make sense to you!

[khushal]

LZ is correct in what he says. Pakistan has had its strategic depth policy enforced by afghan groups ever since zahir shah was forced out of the country. And pakistan is very successful in employing its strategy of convincing these groups that if they fight against pakistan, they would be fighting against Islam. This same strategy was employed by the moghuls more or less.

as far as the ttp being a creation of the cia is bogus. the ttp is defending itself against invasion by pak forces. remember FATA is autonomous is not apart of paksitan proper. The pakistani flag never flew over FATA.

[randolph85]

Pakistan has been supporting the US war and occupation of Afghanistan with critical supply routes and air bases. This action of theirs is logically the only means they are interfering in Afghanistan. Without this support, this war was next to impossible as the supply routes are deemed critical

Pakistan has listened to the US requests before, starting a war in Waziristan. The result of this was a Pakistani defeat in in which they lost over 5000 soldiers

Pakistans support for the US war was one of the reasons groups like TTP came to be

Pakistan is not going to start another civil war at the request of the US. Supporting the US war goes against their interests

Lastly, just because regional nations like China, Pakistan, and Iran are opposed to the US presence, it means nothing at all to the rural Afghan who is just as much opposed to the US occupation

Nothing at all

Comprende?

its called a double game. support for the US and the taliban. the world knows it. it doesn't make the talibans war any less legitimate, but pretending that the paki institution isn't using them for their own ends is ridiculous. do u think the US would alienate a perfect poodle ally, if they didn't actually have legitimate claims against them?