IEA: Mullah Muhammad Umar (hz) does not push TTP for Peace with Napak Army

[Afghanistan2010]

Remarks of Spokesman of Islamic Emirate regarding the false news published by The Express Tribune.



Wednesday, 30 November 2011 05:09 -

The Pakistani newspaper ‘The Express Tribune’, citing unknown sources ands proofs, published a false report on Sunday which claimed that Amir ul Mumineen (Mullah Muhammad Umar Mujahid) H.A. has given guidance to the Pakistani Taliban
and asked them to start talks with the government and turn their full attention to Afghanistan. This report was all out used as evidence by some western backed news agencies as evidence to spread their propaganda. After our extensive investigations, we found that this report has no truth to it. In accordance with the policy of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, we do not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries and neither has such guidance been given to anyone.


We strongly reject such claims and can confidently say that the esteemed Amir ul Mimineen has not sent a letter and neither has he seen face to face with anyone regarding this matter. It is hoped that news agencies will not publish unconfirmed news and reports which are not backed by any credible sources. They should prove that they are honestly working for the benefit of their countries, are observing all journalistic ethics and are not bias towards any side.

The spokesman of Islamic Emirate

Qari Yousuf Ahmadi

[unknownprince]

This makes it further and logically obvious that the Taliban do not answer to Pakistan or any other nation for that matter.

It is rather peculiar that in regards to Imran Khan, the pro-war types are against him and his positions simply due to that fact that he intends to end all Pakistan support for

the US war and occupation and end the war and occupation all together which highlights an important piece of information- these pro-war types in fact support Pakistan's

continued support for the US war and occupation of Afghanistan. Logically, the question to ask then is who is currently pro-Pakistan policies?

Interesting and puzzling.

[Soldat_Amir]

Find it quite odd, the releases this after the Nato attack especially when Pakistan claimed NATO was defending Anti State TTP fighters.

Hmmmm something is fishy.

I would take this with a pinch of salt. It wont be long, before this Dajal backward trash who gave Khost to Punjabi Militants to train will be caught in Pakistan.

Afghanistan2010....you go ahead and live in day dreams.

Living in the West, born in the West, raised in the West and your acting as if your speaking to us directly from a Taliban training camp in Waziristan.

Go and visit your land of origin and see for yourself

Little child killer supporter!

Your Mullah Omar is a Pak paid agent, Taliban are armed and protected by the ISI!

You go ahead and spread your lies, nobody is going to listen to you or your sort! only stupid little excited boys will follow you, not sane educated and well informed people.

[unknownprince]

The simple fact that Farhat Andersen, an avid US war supporter had to write a three part article that covered Imran Khan should indicate to others as to why she is opposed to Imran Khan.

Imran Khan seeks to end Paksitan support for the US war and occupation of Afghanistan, and also intends to end the US war and occupation of Afghanistan all together.

Since these are his positions for the last 7 years, it now becomes clear why the pro-war (they dont admit it) types are opposed to Imran Khan.

However, what becomes even more clear is that these pro-war types currently support Pakistan's support for the US war and occupation of Afghanistan otherwise they would have no problem with Imran Khan's growing candidacy.

This is the only reason they oppose Imran Khan's possible victory. If he was in favor of more support for the US war and occupation, it appears that it would be a different story.


Tying back to the facts in the original article here, and in light of the highlighted observation above, it is only logical to realize that for all Farhat Andersen's supposed anti-Pakistan rhetoric, she and others like her in fact are in supporting Pakistan's support for the US war and occupation of Afghanistan, so they are bent on trying to deny Afghan opposition to occupation.

If there was no Pakistan, they would be blaming China. If there was no China, they would then blame Mongolia.

Factually, nothing can deny the fact that Afghans are opposed to the US war and occupation of their homeland.