Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The North Waziristan trap

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The North Waziristan trap

    The North Waziristan trap

    The North Waziristan trap - Rizwan Asghar Rizwan Asghar
    Thursday, November 17, 2011







    The United States is steadily mounting pressure on Pakistan to extend its counterinsurgency operations to the North Waziristan Agency and go after the Haqqani network of the Afghan Taliban. A kind of consensus has been built in the Western media that North Waziristan is a global nerve-centre of terrorism.

    The Obama administration considers an operation essential for the dismantlement of the Haqqani network to claim victory in Afghanistan. But Pakistani authorities are reluctant to go after militant groups such as the Haqqani network, fearing a fierce blowback inside the country. Another inhibiting factor is that the army is overstretched in other tribal regions.

    North Waziristan is mainly a land of rugged mountains excluding the bordering region that separates it from South Waziristan. The opening up of an active new front in North Waziristan would be stirring up a hornet’s nest by antagonising Mullah Nazir in the Wana sub-division of South Waziristan, Hafiz Gul Bahadur’s Taliban faction based to the west of Miranshah, the capital of North Waziristan, and a host of other militant groups.

    So far, Mullah Nazir and Hafiz Gul Bahadur have been opposed to fighting the Pakistani military because they want to focus their attention on Afghanistan. The military has cut peace deals with both Mullah Nazir and Gul Bahadur in the past. In 2009 the latter’s group even allowed the army free passage through North Waziristan when it staged operations in South Waziristan. On the other hand, the Pakistani military supported Mullah Nazir’s efforts to eject from his tribal areas elements of the Uzbek terror group Islamic Jihad Union.

    The US wants the Pakistani army to launch an operation against the Haqqani network and the Taliban group led by Hafiz Gul Bahadur, since the Americans view these groups as a block to their victory in Afghanistan. But this seems totally impossible due to ground realities which cannot be ignored. Gul Bahadur, the Haqqanis, and Nazir are together estimated to have more than 50,000 forces. In addition, more than 10,000 battle-hardened militants, including Arabs, Uzbeks, Chechens, Indonesians, Tajiks and others affiliated with Al-Qaeda, are present in the area. The nightmare scenario would be the Haqqanis, Gul Bahadur, Al-Qaeda and other hardcore militant groups turning on the Pakistani army in retaliation for a North Waziristan operation. At the same time the country will have to face a deadly new wave of suicide attacks.

    In the past even limited, and inconclusive, army operations resulted in small, scattered militant organisations – even those who were otherwise each other’s rivals – getting united against the Pakistani army. In a similar situation a few years ago, even Mullah Nazir and Hafiz Gul Bahadur joined hands with their rival Baitullah Mehsud and other anti-Pakistani militant groups under the umbrella of an “Ittihad-e-Shura-e-Mujahideen.”

    The last time the Pakistani military took on the Taliban in North Waziristan was in October 2007. The two sides fought pitched battles after the military launched artillery barrages and aircraft assaults against Taliban-controlled villages in North Waziristan. The Taliban responded by setting up complex ambushes, including surface-to-air missile hits. Several Pakistani army helicopters were said to have been shot down during the fighting. The fighting waned when at the end of that month the government pushed for a peace deal. But the Taliban, led by the Haqqani Network and Hafiz Gul Bahadar, remained entrenched in the region.

    The advance on North Waziristan is fraught with multiple risks and Pakistan must resist the US pressure, simply because it is not in our national interest to launch a military venture there. A large-scale operation in North Waziristan would also jeopardise the military’s efforts to clean up other areas. In fighting America’s war, our military and rulers cannot ignore our own strategic interests.

  • #2
    More Pro Paki propaganda! Unknownprince, you really think we are so stupid and insane, that we are not aware of the 1000s of jihadis who constantly kill Afghans are based in North Waziristan.

    You maybe born stupid or maybe are a complete nutter, but the reason why Pakistan is refusing to attack North Waziristan and especially the Mullah Nazirs, Gul Badahurs and Haqqanis, is because they are PRO PAKISTAN

    Comment


    • #3
      Excuse me Soldat. Who is this Unknownprince?

      In regards to what you are saying, the US drone attacks have resulted in over 2000 deaths, with the vast majority confirmed to be civilian deaths. Reports by the Reprieve Organizations as well as the Bureau. Take the example of 16 year old Tariq who had traveled to the Grand Loya Jirga organized in Islamabad. There he attended a lecture by Imran Khan about the drones. The Reprieve Organization then handed out cameras for him to document damage from drones. A week later he and his cousin were traveling in a car, and were killed by drones.


      Here is the report that you can read below. I have highlighted parts for you to read.



      Covert Drone War


      Bureau reporter meets 16-year-old three days before US drone kills him

      November 4th, 2011 | by Pratap Chatterjee | Published in All Stories, Carousel, Covert Drone War, Top Stories | 2 Comments
      Tariq Aziz (circled) at the Grand Jirga in Islamabad
      A week ago I joined a group of elders and dozens of other young men who had travelled from Waziristan, in northern Pakistan, to Islamabad to discuss the impact of US drone strikes in their communities.
      Among the group was Tariq Aziz, a quiet 16-year-old, who had come after he received a phone call from a lawyer in Islamabad offering him an opportunity to learn basic photography to help document these strikes.
      We met for a grand dinner in the conference hall of a luxury hotel. And the next day we all met again at an official meeting – a ‘Waziristan Grand Jirga’. I filmed Tariq Aziz as he walked in with his friends. Each of them pressed their right palms on the chest of each of the elders who lined up to meet them.


      Tariq was proud to be part of this meeting. About 18 months earlier, in April 2010, his cousin Aswar Ullah was killed by a missile fired from a drone as he rode a motorcycle near Norak.
      Tariq, like all of us, listened intently to the speakers, who included the politician and former cricketer Imran Khan.
      What none of us could have imagined was that 72 hours later, this football-loving teenager would himself be killed by a CIA drone, along with his 12-year-old cousin Waheed Khan.
      To watch the Bureau’s report on the ongoing Drone War click on the link below.

      Children killed
      Tariq and Waheed’s death brought the total number of children killed in drone strikes to 175, according to the Bureau’s own findings. As part of an ongoing investigation, the Bureau has documented 306 strikes from remotely piloted drones that have killed between 2,359 and 2,959 people. Over 85% of them have been launched by the administration of President Barack Obama.
      On Monday October 31, Tariq took his cousin Waheed Khan to pick up his newlywed aunt, to take her back to Norak. When the two boys were just 200 yards from the house, two missiles slammed into their car killing them both instantly.
      Tariq came from a poor community on the border with Afghanistan. He was the youngest of seven children. His father, Mumtaz Khan, was away working in the United Arab Emirates as a driver to support his family. Waheed’s family was equally poor – the 12-year-old worked in a local shop for a salary of just Rs 2000 a month (roughly £15 or $23)
      Last week on October 27, Tariq travelled to Islamabad, where he stayed at the Al Habib hotel, after agreeing to work with Shahzad Akbar, a lawyer who runs the Foundation for Fundamental Rights and is now working with families who have lost relatives to drone strikes.
      He had agreed to be part of a project organised by Reprieve, a British legal charity, photographing the aftermath of drone strikes in Waziristan.
      Jemima Khan, the former wife of Imran Khan, who was also at the gathering, has donated a dozen new cameras for use in this project.

      Jemima Khan
      During the Jirga, Tariq sat exactly two rows behind Jemima Khan. For four hours the Waziris debated the drone war, and then they listened to a resolution condemning the attacks. The group voted for this unanimously.
      After lunch, the group travelled to a protest rally outside the Pakistani parliament. Imran Khan, who is now the leader of the Tehreek-e-Insaaf political party, and Clive Stafford Smith, the founder of Reprieve, addressed a gathering of some 2,000 people.
      The next day, Tariq and the other Waziris returned to their homes, eight hours drive away.
      On Monday, October 31, Tariq took his cousin Waheed Khan to pick up his newly wed aunt, to take her back to Norak. When the two boys were just 200 yards from the house, two missiles slammed into their car, killing them both instantly.
      ‘I don’t see the logic and reasoning in killing two young boys,’ Shahzad Akbar told the Bureau. ‘We wanted to work with the youth, to include them in the search for accountability.’
      ‘Bar has been raised’ on CIA drone tactics
      The CIA has secretly agreed changes to how it conducts its drone war in Pakistan after pressure from the military and State Department, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal.
      Last month, the Bureau reported the 300th strike of the CIA’s seven-year drone campaign, and Bureau reporter Chris Woods suggested in an analysis piece that the pattern of recent strikes suggests the CIA has changed tactics to focus on killing senior militants, or High Value Targets.
      The Wall Street Journal’s report appears to confirm this.
      The changes include the State Department having more influence in strike decisions, Pakistani leaders being told about strikes in advance more often, and the CIA holding off from strikes when Pakistani officials are visiting the US, the report says.
      ‘The bar has been raised. Inside CIA, there is a recognition you need to be damn sure it’s worth it,’ the Journal quotes a senior official saying.
      The military and National Security Advisor Tom Donilon are increasingly critical of strikes targeting large groups, as they fear the Pakistani authorities may respond to such strikes by cutting off vital supply routes into Afghanistan.
      Meanwhile, senior State Department officials have been critical of the strikes’ impact on diplomacy with Pakistan, when relations are already strained following the raid that killed Osama bin Laden in May.
      The White House has instigated an appeals process, giving the State Department more influence in deciding when to strike, although the CIA director still makes the final decision, the Journal claims. There has been no fixed policy towards smaller strikes, or targeted attacks on High Value Targets.

      Alice Ross



      Akbar says that the CIA had every opportunity to meet with Tariq, if they wanted to, when he visited Islamabad. ‘If they were terrorists, why weren’t they arrested in Islamabad, interrogated, charged or tried?’
      On Tuesday, Akbar spoke to Noor Kalam, Tariq’s uncle, who said he was devastated by the news. ‘We are helpless. We cannot do anything against the Americans,’ he told the lawyer. ‘We would like insaaf – justice.’
      Mumtaz Khan, Tariq’s father, has flown back from the United Arab Emirates, to mourn the death of his son. He is now in discussions with Akbar to bring a lawsuit against the CIA. He will be the 31st family to sign up.
      Last edited by Guest; 11-17-2011, 05:10 AM.

      Comment

      Working...
      X