Views on a non-Afghan about Afghanistan.

[graveyardofempires]

You mean Taliban denial was the challenge to the UN reports? ....and why would Taliban issue challenges to the UN in Pashto? ..and if there is any evidence in any language, try me.

thats because they put their challenge forth to the afghan nation.
they asked the UN to thoroughly investigate all the incidents in Afghanistan but the UN just shy away and now you are using that as if it is a fact.

on Afghan sources it said they said they would work with any investigation and all the incidents should be investigated.

[ScimitarXEdge]

show the source, doesn't matter which language

[Alchemist]

What a hypocrite!

The Taliban should challange the UN?

The same UN that sanctioned the war on Afghanistan and Iraq? On false allegations presented by the house ****** Collin Powells...

This guy is a walking contradiction. He seems to think UN is some holy and objective institution ... and then he calls others brainwashed.

[ScimitarXEdge]

What a hypocrite!

The Taliban should challange the UN?

The same UN that sanctioned the war on Afghanistan and Iraq? On false allegations presented by the house ****** Collin Powells...

This guy is a walking contradiction. He seems to think UN is some holy and objective institution ... and then he calls others brainwashed.

Graveyard said they challenged the UN. You're also committing a logical fallacy. UN body which sanctioned the war on Iraq, is not the same wing of the UN which measures civilian casualties. So it's a red herring

You are brainwashed, why else would you use an argument based on emotional appeal rather than logic?....and as for Hypocrites are concerned, you're support murderers of Muslims and Sell Pork, talk about brainwashed.

[TheLady]

The only nigga making sense here is my nigga Scimitar.

[Alchemist]

Graveyard said they challenged the UN. You're also committing a logical fallacy. UN body which sanctioned the war on Iraq, is not the same wing of the UN which measures civilian casualties. So it's a red herring

You are brainwashed, why else would you use an argument based on emotional appeal rather than logic?....and as for Hypocrites are concerned, you're support murderers of Muslims and Sell Pork, talk about brainwashed.

Ok smart ass...


which "UN body" sanctioned the war on Iraq and Afghanistan?

The UN security council?



"On 22 March 2011, the 15-member UN Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1974 (2011) renewing UNAMA’s mandate until March 2012."

So sometimes your hand goes into your pants and it does something without your brain being aware of it ...so it's ok. Your brain and your hand aren't related. .... That is the way your logic works...


The one who is committing a red hearing is your panzi ass because we are talking about the validity of the war. You are asserting that the colonizers must remain because if they leave the suicide bombings will increase and the taliban will kill more afghans. This is the rhetoric of the mass media ..so who is brainwashed? Now you are trying to steer the debate in another direction by stating that "the UN" is not one but many...and some are more correct than others. How stupid are you? Really?

[ScimitarXEdge]

I never made any such argument though, you're pulling an AshrafTranny and Graveyard of empires level argument; portraying that only two possibilities exist, either support the Taliban or support Imperialism. I never argued in favor of NATO or colonization. This forum is replete with my literature exposing the IMperialistic agenda.

What I have shown however as of late is that the Taliban have little merit amongst afghans and the proof is that the Muslims prefer an Puppet Government that's rife with corruption over Taliban who brutalizes them.

Your analogy is absurd; as the different wings and units are functioning departments of their own rather than appendages as you try and portray it; they confer under a central body, but in as far as operations are concerned, they do different things I doubt that anyone in the division which analyzes civilian casualties had any hand in the decision to attack Iraq. That would be like saying that the Public Health Bureau in Canada is wrong for how many people die in Canada everywhere from Cancer because Canada is involved in the NATO invasion of Afghanistan.

Your argument becomes discoherent on grounds of logical inconsistency

Not only are you on a red herring; you're fabricting an argument I never made, In your attempt to call me out you have proven yourself a Brainwashed, ignorant intellectually dishonest fraud

[Bengal_Tiger]

Nope, i'm not Zayan, I'm what you call a "Chleuh" in French, a Shilha in English

Shilha people - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

My parents speak almost only french and a little bit of darija. Where are you from ? Are you Bengali ?

I'm from Bangladesh, yes Bengali.

I'm from Sylhet, the famous Moroccan traveller Ibn Batutta visited Sylhet.

There are three main Berber groups in Morocco, Rif in the north, Tamashek in the centre (also in Algeria) and Souss in the south.

The Riffis are the Pakhtoons of Morocco i.e. they are very concerned wit "sharf" (NANG in Pashto) or honour e.g. my northern Moroccan friends told me various stories.




Most famous Riffi of all time, Abdul Karim Khattabi who defeated the French and Spanish and established an independent Riffi Republic. The Vietcong were inspired by his tactics and studied and emulated him.

I am Bangladeshi but speak the Sylheti language, which is called Assamese in India, it's actually a separate language from literary Bengali.

[Al Hanif]

[QUOTE=Bengal_Tiger;523144]I

[Alchemist]

I never made any such argument though, you're pulling an AshrafTranny and Graveyard of empires level argument; portraying that only two possibilities exist, either support the Taliban or support Imperialism. I never argued in favor of NATO or colonization. This forum is replete with my literature exposing the IMperialistic agenda.

What I have shown however as of late is that the Taliban have little merit amongst afghans and the proof is that the Muslims prefer an Puppet Government that's rife with corruption over Taliban who brutalizes them.

Your analogy is absurd; as the different wings and units are functioning departments of their own rather than appendages as you try and portray it; they confer under a central body, but in as far as operations are concerned, they do different things I doubt that anyone in the division which analyzes civilian casualties had any hand in the decision to attack Iraq. That would be like saying that the Public Health Bureau in Canada is wrong for how many people die in Canada everywhere from Cancer because Canada is involved in the NATO invasion of Afghanistan.

Your argument becomes discoherent on grounds of logical inconsistency

Not only are you on a red herring; you're fabricting an argument I never made, In your attempt to call me out you have proven yourself a Brainwashed, ignorant intellectually dishonest fraud

Al fitnatu ashadu minal qatl.