Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

UN General Assembly

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • UN General Assembly

    You can watch it live here: UN General Assembly: live — RT On air

    At the moment David Cameron is giving a speech.




    US leads mass walkout of
    Ahmadinejad speech at UN


    UNITED NATIONS — The United States led a mass walkout of the UN
    General Assembly on Thursday when Iran's President Mahmoud
    Ahmadinejad launched an outspoken attack on Western nations.

    A US diplomat who was in the assembly hall to monitor the speech left
    halfway through, while the 27 European Union nations then followed in a
    coordinated protest move.

    Without naming any country, the Iranian leader strongly attacked the role
    of the United States and its allies in wars and the financial crisis and called
    on major powers to pay reparations for slavery.

    "They officially support racism," Ahmadinejad said. "They weaken countries
    through military intervention and destroy their infrastructures, in order to
    plunder their resources by making them all the more dependent."

    "Mr Ahmadinejad had a chance to address his own people's aspirations for
    freedom and dignity, but instead he again turned to abhorrent anti-Semitic
    slurs and despicable conspiracy theories," said US mission spokesman Mark
    Kornblau.

    "It was a coordinated position by the EU if the Iranian president called into
    question European nations for their 'support of Zionism' and made reference
    to the Holocaust," a French source told AFP.


    AFP: US leads mass walkout of Ahmadinejad speech at UN



    ------


    Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's
    UN speech will be playing
    to his home crowd


    As his domestic problems mount up, the Iranian president
    will seek to use a global platform to bolster his ailing
    regime at home



    Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad arrives at the UN headquarters in New York.
    His speech to the general assembly is key to his prospects at home.


    All eyes are once again on the Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
    He is expected, again, to exploit the high-profile iglobal platform given to
    him during his speech to the UN general assembly.

    Unlike last year, however, when he sought to grab international headlines,
    Ahmadinejad is likely to play to a domestic audience in an attempt to
    bolster his leadership and quash suggestions that he has become a
    lame-duck president two years before his term ends in 2013. Last week, in
    the latest confrontation with conservatives close to the country's spiritual
    leader and highest authority, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, he failed to fulfil a
    pledge to release the US hikers held in Iran accused of spying.

    Ahmadinejad had been hoping the release would take place before his visit
    to New York, so he would win any credit following the release.

    Instead, he was embarrassed by the judiciary, which contradicted his
    remarks and insisted they would make the final decision on the fate of the
    Americans, Shane Bauer and Josh Fattal.

    But Ahmadinejad's dilemma back in Iran is more complex than the
    controversy around the release of two westerners. After publicly
    challenging Khamenei over a cabinet appointment in April, Ahmadinejad
    abruptly lost his position as the protege of the Ayatollah.

    Since then he has become increasingly isolated, with only a handful of
    reliable supporters. He has also lost the support of the elite Revolutionary
    Guards and the majority of his backers in parliament and the wider
    establishment.

    Aside from these continuing feuds, Ahmadinejad and his team – in
    particular his chief of staff and close confidant, Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei,
    and deputy, Hamid Baghaei – who have accompanied him on his visit to
    New York - are facing some of the most serious accusations at home.

    Supporters of Khamenei are worried about the influence of Ahmadinejad's
    regime on Iranian politics, accusing it of everything from revolutionary
    deviancy to financial corruption and even sorcery. Mashaei, who is often
    referred to as the head of a "deviant current" within the president's inner
    circle and viewed as Iran's "real" president, is the focus of criticism due to
    his relatively liberal views. He is accused of trying to undermine clerical
    power and seeking to appeal to younger Iranians by advocating a freer
    society.

    Mashaei has also been accused of involvement in a $2.6bn (£1.7bn)
    banking scam , described as Iran's biggest ever financial fraud.
    Ahmadinejad and Mashaei, whose many allies have been arrested in recent
    months, face a serious challenge in Iran. It seems that Khamenei has
    chosen to tolerate them until the end of Ahmadinejad's term to avoid major
    public confrontation before parliamentary elections in 2012 and presidential
    elections in 2013.

    Ahmadinejad's troubles were further highlighted when it emerged that
    speculation is rife among Iranian MPs that there will be a move to bring
    back the position of prime minister, thus replacing the current system of
    presidency. If this turns out to be the case, it would constitute an attempt
    by MPs to take power, as any prime minister would be appointed by them,
    unlike a president, who is elected by the people.

    Speaking at the UN will give Ahmadinejad a good opportunity to fight back
    against his opponents. During his stay in New York he has been bombarded
    by interview requests from US media and may be viewing this as a chance
    to distract attention from his poor record in Iran, especially the appalling
    violations of human rights.

    Ironically, Ahmadinejad is not receiving the attention he needs at home,
    with even semi-official media giving scant coverage to his visit to the UN.

    To ensure domestic publicity, Ahmadinejad is likely to discuss one of the
    biggest global controversies of them all – Palestinian statehood and Barack
    Obama's apparent support for the Israelis. He may also wish to bring up the
    US and Britain's apparent lack of interest in uprisings in Bahrain and Yemen.



    Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's UN speech will be playing to his home crowd | World news | guardian.co.uk


    -----



    You can see live text updates of the General Assembly here: Ahmadinejad addresses the UN General Assembly - live | World news | guardian.co.uk
    ---
    To advise others is an easy matter, the difficulty is accepting advice -- since it is bitter for those who follow their
    own inclinations and desires
    .


    -Imam al Ghazali

  • #3
    ahmadinejad is the only one with the guts to speak the truth. even though i don't like injustice and oppression in iran, i appreciate that someone speaks out, what so many people are thinking.

    Comment


    • #4
      Abbas defies US with
      formal call for Palestinian
      recognition by UN



      Mahmoud Abbas’s speech calling for Palestinian recognition by the UN is applauded
      by many of the delegates. Photograph: Justin Lane/EPA


      Mahmoud Abbas has formally asked the United Nations to recognise a Palestinian
      state, defying intense US pressure to abandon the move with a powerful appeal to
      the conscience of the world to recognise that the Palestinian people were entitled to
      their own "Arab spring".

      The Palestinian leader was greeted with extended applause as he told the UN general
      assembly that he was seeking recognition of a Palestinian state on land occupied by
      Israel since 1967 with East Jerusalem as its capital because nearly two decades of
      peace negotiations had failed.

      "I do not believe anyone with a shred of conscience can reject our application for a
      full membership of the United Nations and our admission as a full-member state," he
      said. "At a time when the Arab people affirm their quest for democracy – the Arab
      spring – the time is now for the Palestinian spring, the time for independence.

      "It is a moment of truth and my people are waiting to hear the answer of the world.
      Will it allow Israel to continue its occupation, the only occupation in the world?"

      The Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, responded in an uncompromising
      speech to the UN by saying he was seeking a "just and lasting peace" with the
      Palestinians but would not jeopardise the Jewish state's security. "The Palestinians
      should first make peace with Israel and then get their state," he said.

      He attacked the UN as a "theatre of the absurd", unfit to decide on whether there
      should be a Palestinian state.

      "Hezbollah-controlled Lebanon chairs the UN security council. A terror organisation
      presides over the body entrusted with world security. You couldn't make this stuff
      up," he said.

      Abbas submitted the request for UN recognition to the secretary general, Ban
      Ki-moon, shortly before his speech. The security council is unlikely to act soon, in part
      because the Palestinian leader has privately agreed for a vote to be deferred while
      fresh attempts are made to revive the peace process. Washington has said it will veto
      the request.

      Abbas said he had come to the UN because the existing American-dominated peace
      process to end the "colonial military occupation" had failed and a new approach was
      required. "It is neither possible, nor practical, nor acceptable to return to conducting
      business as usual, as if everything is fine," he said.

      His determination to press ahead with an attempt to win recognition of an
      independent Palestine in the face of strong US opposition has prompted the most
      serious attempt to revive the peace process in years as Washington, London and Paris
      sought to avoid a showdown in the security council that could compromise their
      efforts to forge relations with the new governments emerging from the revolutions of
      the Arab spring.

      Days of diplomatic wrangling ended in a compromise that has created a small window
      of opportunity, with a security council vote effectively put on the slow track, to get
      new peace talks off the ground.

      The Middle East Quartet of the UN, EU, US and Russia responded with a proposal for
      talks intended to reach a framework agreement by the end of next year. The French
      president, Nicolas Sarkozy, proposed talks within a year-long timetable.

      Tony Blair, the Quartet envoy, said the proposal was a substantial change from
      previous plans because it required two major issues – borders and security – be
      addressed immediately with each side's comprehensive proposals to be submitted
      within three months.

      That met Abbas's demand in his speech that future negotiations must have "clear
      parameters" and a specific timetable to prevent Israel dragging them out. But the
      Quartet proposal failed to address his call for an immediate halt to settlement
      construction nor Israel's call for recognition as a Jewish state.

      It is unclear whether the proposal meets Abbas's call for a break with the tried and
      failed framework of negotiations – with Washington holding a grip on mediation –
      particularly since what was seen as a partisan pro-Israel speech by Barack Obama to
      the UN on Wednesday. Sarkozy also said American oversight of negotiations had failed
      and called for a greater role for the Europeans and Arab countries which have made
      peace with Israel.

      Abbas said previous Palestinian efforts to reach an agreement had been "repeatedly
      smashed against the rock of the positions of the Israeli government". In particular, he
      blamed the continued construction of Jewish settlements which have doubled in size
      since the 1993 Oslo peace accords.

      "The occupation is racing against time to redraw the borders on our land according to
      what it wants and to impose a fait accompli on the ground that changes the realities
      and that is undermining the realistic potential for the existence of the State of
      Palestine," he said

      "This policy will destroy the chances of achieving a two-state solution upon which
      there is international consensus [and] threatens to also undermine the structures of
      the Palestinian Authority and even end its existence."

      Netanyahu said the Palestinians were in conflict with Israel long before settlement
      construction began in 1967.

      "The core of the conflict is not the settlements. The settlements are a result of the
      conflict," he said. "The core of the conflict has always been, and unfortunately
      remains, the refusal of the Palestinians to recognise a Jewish state in any border."

      The Israeli prime minister rejected Abbas's assertion that the problem lies with the
      Jewish state. He said Israel had made sweeping peace offers in the past met with
      rejection and terrorist attacks by the Palestinians. He said that Israel's withdrawal
      from Gaza, and the closure of its settlements there, had brought not peace but war.

      Netanyahu ridiculed Abbas's talk of Palestinian "hopes and dreams". "Yes, hopes and
      dreams and missiles," he said.



      Abbas defies US with formal call for Palestinian recognition by UN | World news | The Guardian
      ---
      To advise others is an easy matter, the difficulty is accepting advice -- since it is bitter for those who follow their
      own inclinations and desires
      .


      -Imam al Ghazali

      Comment


      • #5
        Since when did the UN become a freedom loving organization. I suspect world countries will from a new world body based on justice, independence, and freedom for all.

        US-Israel era is over.

        Comment


        • #6
          US the father of all secularists will never recognize Palistinians as a nation.
          They will never give them a right of their freedom.

          Comment


          • #7
            us is not the father of anything. it is the bully boy and a puppet of the money makers.

            Comment


            • #8
              Yes feye, and the other factor is the love for keeping others oppressed and under their order. Americans are suffering from this problem but the situation has started going against them.

              Comment


              • #9
                the UN is a joke. as unlikely as it is, i wish to see a day where there is a united islamic nations. the UN is just a monopoly of power by the worlds super/major powers.
                There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

                Sayyid Qutb

                Comment


                • #10
                  all countries should have a voice at the u.n. and one country alone, should not be able to veto a decision.

                  Comment


                  • #11
                    the UN is basically just the security council. the rest of the countries are just observers who have no say in important manners.

                    its the UK, US, russia, china, and france org.
                    There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

                    Sayyid Qutb

                    Comment


                    • #12
                      I pretty much felt the same way about the UN before as a useless organization, dominated by the US.

                      That is the security council.

                      However what I learnt is that the UN has so many sub-bodies a lot of whom do good work and are essential for inter-state relations e.g. trade issues and so on. I don't think it would be worth creating a new global body from scratch, the UN and its sub-bodies such as the UN should remain intact. However the security council needs to be reformed as it is nothing but a tool of the US. The US however will not do so, which is natural though not right. Thus the US needs to be weakened/destroyed, and that is a process happening in front of us. The two main parties contributing to this are Afghans/Pashtuns who are once again defeating another empire, and China.
                      * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X