Haqqani network, peace only if talibans say so

[unknownprince]

^the guy gave an interview to do two things, 1) to say he controls and feels comfortable in Afghan land, and 2) to explain that he follows the Taliban. The implication is that he follows that tune.

thats why the second part of the title gives you the gist of the whole article.
peace only if talibans say so

[randolph85]

whether he is telling the truth or not is of no matter to me. i will poke holes in what he says like i would anyone from idiots like karzai, mullah omar, petraus, and anyone else involved in afghanistan.

"Gone are the days when we were hiding in the mountains along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border. Now we consider ourselves more secure in Afghanistan besides the Afghan people.

didn't the taliban always deny they operated from pakistan?

also, why don't u reply to my quote from his interview regarding the kabul attack?

"For some reasons, I would not like to claim that fighters of our group had carried out the recent attack on U.S. embassy and NATO headquarters. Our central leadership, particularly senior members of the Shura, suggested I should keep quiet in future if the US and its allies suffer in future."

for some reasons? what? he is basically saying that they were responsible but the shura told him to keep quiet. so if he is keeping quiet, then in those posts u made about the taliban taking responsibility, if haqqani is half-ass'edly denying it, who did it then?

[unknownprince]

[QUOTE]

whether he is telling the truth or not is of no matter to me. i will poke holes in what he says like i would anyone from idiots like karzai, mullah omar, petraus, and anyone else involved in afghanistan.

You raised hypotheticals which are not valid. Your almost fighting with the wind here.

didn't the taliban always deny they operated from pakistan?

They do not recognize the Durrand line.

also, why don't u reply to my quote from his interview regarding the kabul attack?

Who am I to reply? How am I supposed to know why some event is not commented on?

for some reasons? what? he is basically saying that they were responsible but the shura told him to keep quiet. so if he is keeping quiet, then in those posts u made about the taliban taking responsibility, if haqqani is half-ass'edly denying it, who did it then?

Nothing has been denied. Thats what you feel. Someone wishes not to speak about something, then they don't. The Taliban already took responsibility for the attacks.

Yeah, I think he pretty much says he listens to the Shura. What is your point?

[Afghanistan2010]

you can go around from kabul to kandahar to jalalabad non of them used another name as talibjan or soldier of the islamic emirate....this is western mass propaganda giving names and therms to those who they created with their fantasy.

even the pakistani taliban claim back to their oath they have given Mullah Umar and the Taliban in Afghanistan and they even have support in Bajaur,Dir and they help their counterparts in Kunar,Nuristan and Khost attacks,even in Paktika some stories from locals were reported about pakistani taliban members helpin afghan taliban.

[randolph85]

how do the taliban not recognize the durand line when they say what happens in pakistan is a pakistani matter and not related to them?