I am not proud of actions of pak army in 1971 but bengali brother is the one who is bragging about his people. Bengali are not martial peopl.... Bakhtiar khilji, a pashtun, conquoured bangladesh with just 18 men.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The truth behind the creation of pakistan and colonization of pashtunkhwa
Collapse
X
-
For all of those reading this.
Karachi, the racist Hindustani son of the Ganges who lives as a refugee in Canada, and who hates Bengalis is completely wrong and is spreading lies.
Bengalis did the vast majority of fighting though they recieved ammunition from India, whilst the Punjabis recieved support from their father America.
India towards the end of the war only jumped in to finish things off the war after the Pakistan army had essentially been defeated.
Karachi, the racist Hindustani son of the Ganges obsessed with race, genetics and with an inferiority complex is ignorant and knows nothing about the history of Bengal.
This ignorant racist Hindustani son of the Ganges is merely coming out with complete nonsense which he is concluding without any knowledge, too busy as he is with his Nazi-style obsession with genetics, race, racial purity, supposedly racist professors conspiring against him etc.
Bengalis were key in the Indian Mutiny of 1856.
The founder of the Indian National Army was an Indian Bengali, Subash Chandra Bose.

Subash Chandra Bose, a Bengali founder of the anti-British Indian National Army

Legendary Bengali leader and Indian independence hero, Bose with German generals.
This hate-filled racist Hindustani now living off Canadians is following the British "Theory of the Martial Races", whereby they held that those races who were:
1. More similar racially to the British, tall and Caucasian e.g. Punjabis and Pakhtuns were more martial.
2. Those who were more loyal to them.
The British of course omitted the Marathis who were a great military nation and adversaries of Hadhrat Ahmed Shah Abdali (rahmatullahi alaihi).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martial_Race
Critics of this theory state that the Indian rebellion of 1857 may have played a role in reinforcing the British belief in 'martial races'. During this event some Indian troops (known as 'Sepoys'), particularly in Bengal, mutinied, but the loyal Pathans, Punjabis, Gurkhas, Kumaoni/Kumaunis and Garhwalis did not join the mutiny and fought on the side of the British Army. From then on, this theory was used to the hilt to accelerate recruitment from among these 'races', whilst discouraging enlistment of 'disloyal' Bengalis and high-caste Hindus who had sided with the rebel army during the war....
The Marathas were classified as 'non-martial'after the 1857 rebellion(in which the Marathas of Kanpur and Jhansi played a key role, blatantly ignoring the military achievements of the Maratha Empire or the Maratha Regiment's contribution against the Turks during the First World War, when they were recruited by the British Indian Army
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mukti_Bahini
Often Mukti Bahini operated as an effective guerrilla force to keep their enemies on the run. Inspired in part by revolutionary Che Guevara,[1] they have been compared to the French Maquis, Viet Cong, and the guerrillas of Josip Broz Tito in their tactics and effectiveness.[2]
The fact is the racist Hindustani refugee from Canada has developed a deep hatred of me ever since I told him off for calling for the expulsion of millions of Afghan refugees from Pakistan (ironic since he is a refugee two times, a refugee from India to Sindh, "Pakistan" and then to Canada). In other threads where Afghan/Pashtun posters would say far worse than me he would ignore them, but if I said something 10 times less he would go hysterical and bark and attack me.
The fact that a Hindustani, son of the Ganges like himself is mocking Bengalis for being a "weak" nation (lol....tell that to the Ivory Coast and Sierra Leone who we restored to stability with our troops and who have made Bengali an official language) is a huge irony, given that Pakhtuns/Afghans have always looked down on Indians as him as a weak race.
The MQM and Hindustanis in Karachi to this day complain about general Babar, a Pashtun who sent troops in to Karachi and SMASHED the Hindustani supremacist MQM, with MQM-wallas claiming 10,000 Urdu-speakers were killed.
To this day the MQM have never forgotten who general Babar is.
The leader of the MQM, Altaf Hussain also served in East Pakistan where the NA-PAK army was defeated so this probably also serves as a factor in the Canadian Hindustani refugee's bitterness and hatred.
In the following video a Pashtun apparently slaps an Indian-origin Pakistani in Karachi (others say it's in Dubai and an Indian from India proper and not an Indian from Karachi, "Pakistan").
karachi pathan slap indian terrorist in karachi ( 6 MILLION PASHTUNS LIVE IN KARACHI) - YouTube
So it is a huge irony that Karachi, the race-obsessed, genetics-obsessed, inferiority-complexed Hindustani refugee is talking about a "weak" race, when this is exactly the same manner in which Pashtuns of Karachi see his fellow Hindustanis. I think what the Pashtun above did was wrong, and violence is not good in Islam (unless in a legitimate war under the appropriate authorities) and Islam encourages restraint and non-violence in most cases. However I have posted this video to highlight the arrogant and conceited Hindustani's stupidity.
The fact is this whole idea of "we are tougher than you" is something neanderthal and something shared by fans of WWF and not educated people.
To conclude Pakistani bitterness that they lost the 1971 war (despite extensive backing from America, Arab countries, Iran e.g. 74 planes, China and all their other allies) to Muslim Bengalis is sad and unfortunate.
Pakistanis should move on and forget about their defeat, shame and humiliation and move on.
Move on Pakistanis, 1971 was 40 years ago, a long time ago. Now you have other problems e.g. MQM killing Balochis and chopping their bodies up in Karachi, MQM threatening to kill the Mufti Taqi Hussain, Balochistan crisis, civil war in Pakhtunkhwa, corruption, power shortages, crime and so on. Please focus on these real problems and not some war nearly half a century ago.
Move on.* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Comment
-
Bangladesh army parade. The most important thing is everything that the soliders wear and carry is indigenously produced including, boots, packs, helmets and rifles.
Bangladesh Army Infantry Soldiers With Full Combat Gear - YouTube
Bangladesh army.wmv - YouTube
Anyway Pakistanis are losers.
They sucked up to the British Raj.
Were defeated by Bengalis in 1971.
Kill and butcher each other like animals in Karachi.
Get bombed almost daily by the US with drones and feel no shame about that.
On lots of Bangladeshi military videos Pakistanis come invited to make nasty comments, though Bengalis do not even bother to go to Pakistani videos. Talk about inferiority complex.
Pakistanis get over your inferiority complex to us, just because you can't stand that we defeated you and kicked your ass out of our country.* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Comment
-
Originally posted by Aab-e-Hayat View PostBengali wrora you people should thank india for liberating your country from pakistan.
He should thank Pakistan for exposing itself as a nation of racists and benamoos people.
Bengalis crushed you like flies, Paani- Bhai!
Never forget that!
And I love the way you admit defeat to India every now and then.
Why don´t you Pakis learn from your failures and just quit this stupid rivalry with India?
If it ever comes to a war between you, you LOSE!
Just leave it and concentrate on your own domestic failures.Last edited by MostafaM; 09-06-2011, 03:51 PM.The only constant is change.
Comment
-
there are many sindhi people in my state Gujarat who migrated in 1947 from Sindh, Pakistan. .. .though they r hindus but their culture is singnificantly different than main stream Indian hindu culture. ..I strongly belive that Ethnicity ie. Geography hold more weightage than religion.Originally posted by Karachi View Postyes the rural people are, not sure about the political elites who run the country, they probably came from outside
there are things practiced in in rural areas of punjab and sindh that date back to the indus valley civilization.
Comment
-
yes,it is my own creation mr mqm wala bhaiy.Originally posted by Shehbaz Khan View Post^ Is this your own creation or you got it from a writer?
Source please?
so do you also need source for where altaap bhai getting his weapon from?
It is a fact.
paki history is written in other books too not just your pak study.
you people read napak study,watch ptv,geo and read daily jang and thats the real problem.
The creation of pakistan harm muslims and the entire region.

Support pashto language and greater pukhtoonkhwa.
pa prady jaba khabarai pakhtun naka
be laila bala soda kho majnon naka
gero jabo kre lahoo pa khpal tahzeeb ki
be pakhtu ba de bal hestsok rastoon naka
hamza baba
پَښتو کښې اُولېکئ
Pashto Keyboard Online (Afghan) LEXILOGOS >>
Comment
-
well islam is a strong faith, muslims feel the brotherhood even if they are from the opposite side of planet, however i agree that culture also plays a role, espeically in rural areas. I personally find the sindhi and rajhistani culture very fascinting, they are so old and beautiful! also yes, if the cultures are similar, people get along fine, just like the punjabies on both sides of the border, they are pretty much the same peopleOriginally posted by Maulik View Postthere are many sindhi people in my state Gujarat who migrated in 1947 from Sindh, Pakistan. .. .though they r hindus but their culture is singnificantly different than main stream Indian hindu culture. ..I strongly belive that Ethnicity ie. Geography hold more weightage than religion.Last edited by Karachi; 09-07-2011, 02:12 AM.
Comment
-
The last part of which logicallly takes us to one conclusion. Does 'Pakistan' seperate natural kinsfolk? If one can base Pakistan on an argument of religious sepratism between Muslim Panjabi and Hindu Panjabi or the same argument for Sindhis and Bengalis, then the case for the Durrand Line simply dematerialises as Pashtoons are one and the same.Originally posted by Karachi View Postwell islam is a strong faith, muslims feel the brotherhood even if they are from the opposite side of planet, however i agree that culture also plays a role, espeically in rural areas. I personally find the sindhi and rajhistani culture very fascinting, they are so old and beautiful! also yes, if the cultures are similar, people get along fine, just like the punjabies on both sides of the border, they are pretty much the same people
Comment
-
^ the seperation of pashtuns and punjabies are different, pashtuns on both sides are muslims and ethinically the same, punjabies on both sides are ethinically the same but are different religiously
Pakistan was made on a separate religious identity, so yes separation of pashtuns doesn't make sense because they are same ethnically and religiously, they are one people in every sense
Comment
-
Attacking us, insulting us, in our platform? We have made up our mind! A ban for you would be a nice idea, haha!Originally posted by r3alistYou jOkers can't make up your mind on whether you are Pashtun or Muslim, you guys are barely out of tribal society, Africa would be a good place, haha.
Enjoy Pul-e-Charkhi.
Caveat:
We are pretty hospitable. However, when you join to troll, we won't hesitate to ban you.Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.
A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai
For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."
The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!
-Ferishta, 1560–1620
Comment
-
Greetings, dear PF'er. I hope you are in good health.Originally posted by Karachi View Post^ the seperation of pashtuns and punjabies are different, pashtuns on both sides are muslims and ethinically the same, punjabies on both sides are ethinically the same but are different religiously
Pakistan was made on a separate religious identity, so yes separation of pashtuns doesn't make sense because they are same ethnically and religiously, they are one people in every sense
If we are all one people, why kick out "Afghan Muhajirs". Heck, why even call them Muhajirs? How dare the government of Pakistan coin such an absurd term! It's either we are all Muslim, and we create an Islamic caliphate with no borders, or we attempt to serve our own hidden 'strategic' agenda. You can't claim Pakistan was made for the "Muslims" yet kill innocent Chechyn Muslims, and intentionally brainwash young Pukhtuns to serve your 'strategic depth' and ongoing cash-flow. Brother Karachi, let me be very blunt with you. I have absolutely no problems with Punjabis, Muhajirs, etc. However, I do have a problem with hypocrites. The government of Pakistan and Afghanistan are presently full of hypocrites. Pakistan at times remins me of Israel, it sings the same mantra, and there are very obvious resemblances. I admire the inhabitants of Pakistan and Afghanistan equally. However, to claim we are one, yet label the very same Pukhtuns as "Muhajirs" is ridiculous, to say the least. Pakistan is a very dirty asset for the west. The very same "Muslims" allowed the "Kuffar" to invade Afghansitan. Heck, if Pakistan becomes "Muslim" the war in Afghanistan would end in a day. Whether I support the war or not is an entirely different discussion. One thing which is pretty obvious however is that Pakistan hasn't been much of a great Muslim, now has it?Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.
A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai
For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."
The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!
-Ferishta, 1560–1620
Comment
-
Originally posted by gadoonwal View Postyes,it is my own creation mr mqm wala bhaiy.
so do you also need source for where altaap bhai getting his weapon from?
It is a fact.
paki history is written in other books too not just your pak study.
you people read napak study,watch ptv,geo and read daily jang and thats the real problem.
The creation of pakistan harm muslims and the entire region.
Thanks for the clarification. And as far as me being MQM'er is concerned you ran off that thread.
Khaad wosi !!yao warokay ghwandi baagh ao pa khwa ye seen rawan!
Comment



Comment