Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Karachi politics: Make space for the Pashtuns

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by tor_khan View Post
    Reality check. Pashtoons are not exclusively Afghan nationals or from Pakhtunkhwa. Whilst I would hope that we would collectively represent a uniform beneficial political interest that combines cultural pride with social emancipation, that is something to continue to work towards.

    Right now, do not be surprised that Pashtoons can be American citizens, Afghan citizens, pro-religion, pro-American intervention, pro-India, pro-Pakistan and all of the reverse etc.

    The one thing I will extend to Shehbaz is our collective sense of Pashtoon brotherhood. On the whole, he remains polite and fundamentally dignified in the Pashtoon sense. No, I don't agree with his politics vis-a-vis Karachi/Pakistan/"Pathan" labels, but a Pashtoon he is.
    thats no true at all.
    Pashtuns only mean Afghans and pro religion.
    if there is someone denying that fact he is no more pashtun.
    if a pashtun is pro pakistani than is anti pashtun for being against his own people and working on destruction of his own identity,not just that but creating a basterdisation of the name Pashtun by saying pakistani pashtun(an oxymoron term).
    pro American "intervention"(as you call it)is seen as un pashtun and extremely dangerouse for the wel being of Pashtuns.
    Pro india pashtuns are non existance.

    btoom line is Pashtuns are Afghans no matter where they reside or what nationality they hold,their collective identity is Afghan and their mother land is Loy Afghanistan which is current Afghanistan plus Pukhtunkhwa.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Karachi View Post
      First, i am not mocking their death, you didn't understand what i said, i meant he should worry about the huge problems in Bangaldesh rather in a totally different country which he has nothing to do with. also i didn't say he doesn't have the right to be here. what i am saying is why does he talk about pakistan and karachi, as if he lives there???? he has nothing to do with pakistan or karachi. He is making fun and saying bad things about Shehbaz Khan, a guy who lives in karachi and knows the situation better then anyone here. I think he should stick to this own problems first
      he has more right to be here since he is a friend of Pashtuns and has ancestral connection to us but we cant say the same about you.

      Comment


      • #63
        ^ just because he says he has ancestoral connections, doesn't make it so, what is the proof?. also he has no right to talk about pakistan or karachi, infact you dont either. people who have never stepped inside the country should step BSing about the situation

        Comment


        • #64
          Tor_Khan: Lala Regards for your comments. We can dis-agree in a nice way, and it's your right to disagree and mine also.

          Plus the comment of mine which you quoted stating "So now you agree that the word Pathan could be used interchangeably with the word Pakhtun? Is this so?"

          This was in response to the following post of Graveyardofempires, not in response to the one you quoted in your post.



          Originally posted by graveyardofempires View Post
          listen you pathetic liar
          pathan was only used by ghani khan for the non pukhtun audiances.

          but its funny how you keep dragging that ghani kkhan said pathan while extreme majority find that tern nothing to do with pukhtane.


          yao warokay ghwandi baagh ao pa khwa ye seen rawan!

          Comment


          • #65
            look at this pathetic pro paki isi liar with his cunning tactics

            Comment


            • #66
              ^ Should I be replying, I've got a paper of Financial Accounting tomorrow, good night :p
              yao warokay ghwandi baagh ao pa khwa ye seen rawan!

              Comment

              Working...
              X