Is the US behind Ahmad Wali Karzai's death?

[unknownprince]

Thoughts. In studying and researching him, he was not really involved with the Americans in their war to any extent. In fact, it appears they did not like him due to his stances against them.

[sahil112]

its to hard to tell, could of been them or the taliban, both had something to gain from it!

question now is who will take his place, if it shah wali then hmm it dosnt look to good couse some family members no him and apprently he is a really quite and far away from the war and killing etc he wouldnty no how to rule and would be run over by higher people and on top of that not many people actualy no him at all.

then there are karzais saka brothers who could take his place but apprently they are more harsh and involved in more thingz man can imagine so who should take his place :S hard choicee but who ever does i hope they work for a better kandahar, afghanistan and the pashtun people.

[BarakzaiAbdali]

Thoughts. In studying and researching him, he was not really involved with the Americans in their war to any extent. In fact, it appears they did not like him due to his stances against them.

He absolutely was involved with Central Intelligence and was on their payroll. The US referred to him as their landlord. He was indifferent to their war making on the populace that opposed him and merely intervened to avoid them limiting his and the oligarch's powers.

[BarakzaiAbdali]

"In 2009, the New York Times published perhaps the most explosive report on Karzai: that he had been on the CIA payroll since 2001, putting together a militia of Afghan paramilitary forces to conduct raids against suspected Taliban fighters in Kandahar.
Karzai consistently denied the claim, saying: "I don't know anyone under the name of the CIA. I have never received any money from any organisation. I help, definitely. I help other Americans wherever I can. This is my duty as an Afghan."

http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth...244784171.html

He admits clearly that he is a munaafiq. In an ideal situation, he would have been tried for his crimes and his heretical actions. However, in a state of war, he legitimized himself as a target.

[unknownprince]

"In 2009, the New York Times published perhaps the most explosive report on Karzai: that he had been on the CIA payroll since 2001, putting together a militia of Afghan paramilitary forces to conduct raids against suspected Taliban fighters in Kandahar.
Karzai consistently denied the claim, saying: "I don't know anyone under the name of the CIA. I have never received any money from any organisation. I help, definitely. I help other Americans wherever I can. This is my duty as an Afghan."

http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth...244784171.html

He admits clearly that he is a munaafiq. In an ideal situation, he would have been tried for his crimes and his heretical actions. However, in a state of war, he legitimized himself as a target.

okay then, case closed.

[Nick]

okay then, case closed.

I personally think Ahmad karzai might also be involved because next election set to date and so one more time he might want to take another chance or maybe he thinks he can get another so doesn't want his brother's bad image to reflect his image. Whatever happened to him karzai sure had given him a lot accusation from people, the world as well him being godfather sure he had enemies who wanted to kill him. If it was Taliban One dirt out of many dirts of the south I wish more of these dirty people are killed specially drug lords of the north east and central regions inshallah we will be clean from harmful drugs.

[Gulbabo]

I thinkkkk Hamid karzai was involved himself...

Wali karzai was a bad apple... he threw him in the garbage...