Jinnah and co

[Bengal_Tiger]

Asalamu 'alaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatu all true Muslims, a warm hello to all non-Muslims.

I would like to thank my Muslim brother Yaggi for the time and effort he has spent in producing material exposing the true nature of the British agent who created "Pakistan", Ali Jinnah.

From the early days of Islam many false prophets and decievers have plagued this ummah including the likes of Musaylama the false prophet of the Najdi Arabs, or Abdullah bin Saba from Yemen, or Hassan As-Sabah, or Hasan Ali Shah Mahallati (the first "Aghan Khan", an Iranian warlord whom the British used to try and overthrow the Shah then gave property and a following in Mumbai). One such liar and traitor is Ali Jinnah.

Many of the Islamic ulama (scholars) had warned the ummah against creating "Pakistan" and now we can see how accurate they were in their predictions with this British-state contributing nothing to this world but misery, suffering and blood, having killed and raped more Muslims than even Israel.

Brother Yaggi, may Allah bless you in your noble efforts and may many Muslims read this thread and learn the true nature of British-backed traitor and liar, Ali Jinnah.

Thank you brother, jazakumAllah khair.

May Allah give freedom, peace and justice to the Muslims of Balochistan, Sindh, Pakhtunkhwa and Afghanistan.

Inna-Allaha al Azeez al Qadeer; Indeed Allah is the most powerful and the most capable.

Allahumma sallee 'alaa sayyidina Muhammad, ashraful makhlooqat.

Allah please bestow peace upon our noble master Muhammad, the most honourable of creation.

Ameen.

[Shehbaz Khan]

how about you keep your mind and mouth clean first.

I don't make the place dirty with it .. I know how to convey my message in a civilized way

[Master Khan]

I always know that Jinnah wasn't a true muslim when I was little,
I never been to a Paki school so thats why lol, I read about him like 5 years ago on internet and realise that his daughter is married to kafirr in India lol.
I always wonder about his family now a days and they are KAfirs in india.

[graveyardofempires]

whahahahha "why ANP" ????????????
so you don't know why ANP.....
You should know that ANP is playing the role of the right hand of the ISI and killing Pashtuns in swat, dir, buner, bajaur and so many other areas.
They are supporting ISI and army and the govt and enjoying the army's protocol and security. But you will never speak against ANP because you are also a secular thug hypocrite.
You should condemn and speak against the ISI, army, govt and anp rather digging graves.

Minority is ruling there everyone knows. Media is in their hands, your establishment and beaurocracy is in their hands. Just count your representatives in the parliament, You will realize that they are far more than the Pashtoons.... OPEN YOUR EYES

well we also have the PASHTUN taliban dont we.
so not just have half of the the half but also another full half.
and after teh end of durrand line there will be no stopping us.

[graveyardofempires]

I don't make the place dirty with it .. I know how to convey my message in a civilized way

you were made civilised by the british.Nuff said.

[afghan]

The level of interest you showing in our country reveals that you like our country. Please first get rid of those tajik, uzbak hazara and others who are in minority and ruling the majority Pashtoons, after that you should speak against others otherwise all your words are going in vain.
Don't waste your time

we are not intereted in your country we are interested in our land occupied by british, then black british. it wont be easy to digest afghan blood so easily. your army will be broken any time. tajiks uzbecs and hazaras are the citizens of one country we cannt get rid of them.

[gadoonwal]

pashtuns waste their time by blaming eachothers everywhere.
They are ruled by non pashtuns .
One side live under punjabi rule the other side is badly influenced by iranian culture and language.
Only god can help them to understand.

[Shehbaz Khan]

you were made civilised by the british.Nuff said.

Ahh, and the Afghans were unable to make you civilize? British are way better than I suppose

P.S= This post is just a response to the conversation. Nobody should take it as Shehbaz Khan thinks that Afghans are uncivilized?

[R3SISTANC3]

^ The list is long and unfortunately you couldn't give birth to any of them in the past few decades !!

Karzai Drinks? Don't you think so?

Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan, Fakir-e-Afghan, Bacha Khan

I know some of you might not know him if you are from Pakistan especially because he is banned from history books. Nonetheless he was the hero of past few decades. In this current decade there are countless heroes, if by hero meaning those who die for the honor and dignity of Pashtun land. We just dont know their names and there are so many.

Every day on both sides of the Durand line Mirwais, Ahmed Shah, Sher Shah, Khushal Khans are born and die.

They have a different name for them now, they are called "terrorists".

[Shehbaz Khan]

^ I know about Bacha Khan and company!! When exactly they died? Who in the current time is a hero?

[R3SISTANC3]

^ I know about Bacha Khan and company!! When exactly they died? Who in the current time is a hero?

A nation that needs a hero doesn't deserve it.

Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan died on January, 20, 1988. That's not long ago. The problem is that if there are Pashtun heroes Pashtun are divided due to mixed priorities and loyalties. For example you are a pro-Pakistan Pashtun, and no matter what evidence is given to you about Pakistani policy that is detrimental to the Pashtun nation, you seem to make justifiable excuses for it.

Before we can have a leader, we must be united on a common cause and ground. Once we have that a leader will naturally emerge as always. This is testimonial in the rise of the Taliban and Mullah Omar. I have my on reservations about the Talibs and Mullahs, but the conditions were ripe and the society demand it. In other words before we can move further, all counter propaganda such as yours must be addressed so the masses can make an informed decisions and recognize who is friend and foe. Something not possible in the current anarchic times.

[afghanis_hehe]

whats wrong with afghani sarakaree khayratee tattoo saab??
our leaders our elders all afghan and afghani
what afghan and afghani mean culture and history?
afghan mean defeating british 3 times
afghan mean defeating russia
afghan mean defending against usa nato everyone together
afghan mean brave people with brave history and culture
afghan mean ruling india for centuries
afghan mean converting pakistani forefathers to PAK RELIGION

people respecting afghan history culture looks admiring beauty
all over world including muslim world afghan admired

PAKI is top 20 curse word in UK!!!!

Profanity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


even pakistanis wish they afghani that is power of being AFGHAN

ABDALI MISSILE
Abdali-I - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GHORI MISSILE
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghauri_(missile)

In February 2006, Karzai regime delivered a complaint to Pakistan for naming its lethal ballistic missiles after Afghan kings and rulers (i.e. Abdali, Ghaznavid and Ghauri), arguing that their names should be bracketed with academic, cultural and peace-promoting institutions, not with tools of destruction and killing. However, Pakistan declined to change the missiles' names stating that these Muslim rulers are considered heroes in Pakistan as well, and naming missiles after them is not controversial.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghauri_(missile)



only brainwash khayratee with sarkaree family servants
too stupid not realize beauty pride history of AFGHAN TITLE

Well i will tell u the truth behind naming the weapon.do u think ghaznavi a turk was ur leader , he was ruling afghanistan in th same manner he ruled pakistan .ok read history and then claim ghaznavi to be ur leader he was ruling u and ghaznavid were the ones who turned afghans into muslims.
then ghauri was a persian and its proven in the records of minhaj al siraj the hostorian at that time . muhammad ghauri ruled indian and half of afghanistana nd ghyasudin ghauri ruled other half and central asia. so he was not your leader rather he was ruling u. all the dnasties were turks who were ruling afghanistan for centuries. even the lodhi suri dnasties were partly turks coz as u claim that these were descendants of bibi mato but in real i think everything comes from the father who was shah hussain who was a turk.
Only abdali was pashtun but still he was born in multan and man that place belongs to pakistan and even if we chose his name as weapon so what 70 percent of pakhtuns are pakistanis .
i think u need to check the history and read some books abt ur past . afghanistan has been under rule of hindus for quite a long time . kabul shahi dynasty , gurjar pratihars u need to read them.
wel i didnt mean to hurt u but i just wanted to give true version of story which u have not read .take care next time u cant say that we are naming our missile on afghan rulers. they were turks who were ruling afghanistan i.e khorasan.take care

[Shah-i-Kot]

Well i will tell u the truth behind naming the weapon.do u think ghaznavi a turk was ur leader , he was ruling afghanistan in th same manner he ruled pakistan .ok read history and then claim ghaznavi to be ur leader he was ruling u and ghaznavid were the ones who turned afghans into muslims.
then ghauri was a persian and its proven in the records of minhaj al siraj the hostorian at that time . muhammad ghauri ruled indian and half of afghanistana nd ghyasudin ghauri ruled other half and central asia. so he was not your leader rather he was ruling u. all the dnasties were turks who were ruling afghanistan for centuries. even the lodhi suri dnasties were partly turks coz as u claim that these were descendants of bibi mato but in real i think everything comes from the father who was shah hussain who was a turk.
Only abdali was pashtun but still he was born in multan and man that place belongs to pakistan and even if we chose his name as weapon so what 70 percent of pakhtuns are pakistanis .
i think u need to check the history and read some books abt ur past . afghanistan has been under rule of hindus for quite a long time . kabul shahi dynasty , gurjar pratihars u need to read them.
wel i didnt mean to hurt u but i just wanted to give true version of story which u have not read .take care next time u cant say that we are naming our missile on afghan rulers. they were turks who were ruling afghanistan i.e khorasan.take care

Multan was ruled by Pashtun. In fact, Pashtun ruled the subcontinent for some period of time. There was the Lodhi dynasty, the Suri dynasty,etc.


Hindus ruled over Punjab and Sindh. Afghanistan was where Indians (Muslims and Hindu servants of the British Raj) were massacred with their British Raj masters- one doctor was sent back to deliver the message of the massacre. Those Indian muslims who served under their Master the British Raj.

Pashtuns can never be ruled, and have already defeated the West.

The West is finished, running out of Afghanistan to a bleak future of stone ages with broken economies.


Pakistan betrayal of Afghanistan with NATO supply routes was symbolic of the nature of the dirty government and army. Propping up the illegal Karzai regime in Kabul and the NATO war.

It doesnt matter that Pakistan has closed the NATO supply routes now. They still supported the NATO war .


Shame on Pakistan, Shame!!

[afghanis_hehe]

Multan was ruled by Pashtun. In fact, Pashtun ruled the subcontinent for some period of time. There was the Lodhi dynasty, the Suri dynasty,etc.


Hindus ruled over Punjab and Sindh. Afghanistan was where Indians (Muslims and Hindu servants of the British Raj) were massacred with their British Raj masters- one doctor was sent back to deliver the message of the massacre. Those Indian muslims who served under their Master the British Raj were from the people who eventually became Pakistanis. Old habits dont die.

Pashtuns can never be ruled, and have already defeated the West.

The West is finished, running out of Afghanistan to a bleak future of stone ages with broken economies.


Pakistan betrayal of Afghanistan with NATO supply routes was symbolic of the nature of the dirty government and army.

It doesnt matter that Pakistan has closed the NATO supply routes now. They still supported the NATO war .


Shame on Pakistan, Shame!!

Well i think u should come into the real world as see for urself that afghans have been ruled a lot of times and have been defeated most of the times. i will go stepwise ok . bfr that i would say that u guys have hindus and sikhs in ur country right , so do u think they just jumped to that place nope , ranjit singh basically took them or converted alot of them to sikhs. though hindus in ur country are traders that settled there a long time ago . while u need to accept the fact that u have been defeated and ruled alot of times. what do u think definition of rule means , that they were governing the region which is now called afghanistan ok. U need to check out the maps of the rulers who were either hindus, turks and persians who ruled the region which is afghanistan today . I just want to tell u that u shudnt make up ur opinions without concerning some sources. Well u shoudl have a look at this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Afghanistan .
Dont complain that this is wikipedia and anybody can write it .u can check further sources for maps. it wil tell u the reality .starting from hindu shahi dyanasty(Kabul shahi in other words) which included kabul then came janjua rajput emire then ghaznavids and those were turks and then ghauris who also ruled the present day afghanistan (i dont know why u say that u have not been ruled u have been ruled all these centuries) then came mongols chengis khan who defeated the khwarizm empire and in that time khwarizm empire include all the present day afghanistan and he defeated the empire and ennexed that place to his large mongol empire.Then timur came and he annexed that place again. After timur bahlol lodhi who was a pashtun came but he had a very weak empire only sikandar lodhi was a capable ruler(Well i love this guy because he killed a lot of non muslims) then came mughals who ruled the present day afghanistan. it was because of this land of afghanistan that there were continous battles betwen mughals and safavids .Now how can u say that ur land was never ruled .Even Ranjit singh with his army ruled Frontier and parts of Afghanistan.
Man u need to accept the fact that u have been ruled by turks persians and mongols and hindus. On the other hand u can believe that u were never ruled but no body can deny thsi fact that the country where afghanistan lies today has been ruled by many turks persians mongols and hindus.
Suris ruled and i personally lov sher shah but i dont really admire ahmad shah as he was the general of nadir shah(another turkic king of iran who was a plunderer and looter).
Have a look at this link u will get the truth .And shame on u for making up the history by urself u need to consult sources .if u need any more info do cntact me

[Shah-i-Kot]

GraveyardofEmpires

Remind me who is living in a fantasy?

Pakistan sufferred 5000 Pak soldier casualties in FATA - army of slaves.

50 NATO countries with the most advanced weapons and technology allied with Pakistan have lost to Pashtuns

Pakistan gets to be known as the country that served the West and helped prop up Karzai in Kabul.