Albani_Rahmat_Kabulzada aka owner of Afghanprofile site must leave

[IamDZJ]

the owner of that website is a panjsheri guy living in new zealand.

[Shayesta]

Don't ban him, since there is hardly anyone joining his Khorasani forums he is left with no choice than to bark at a Pukhtoon one.

[gadoonwal]

HE IS PASHTUN HATER.He created more then one websites against pashtuns.
Non-pashtuns can join the forum as long as they follow the forum rules.
If kabulzada wants to stay here he should discuss everything in civilised manners.
Sometime kabulzada speaks the truth so we can not say he is out of his mind all the time.

[gadoonwal]

the owner of that website is a panjsheri commander's son born in astralia.

YOU MEAN PASHTUNFORUM?
Kindly explain.
manana

[Alchemist]

who the hell do u think u 're?? some intellectual? some professor?? some genius that u form a threat to ppl of this community??? threat of stupidity?? no matter their age but ppl like Shayesta sis can press u even under her pink 'n nor can u in ur entire life reach her level of intelligence 'n knowledge. Khushal is doin' exactly what u 're doin' to this forum 'n Comrade has shut ur fcukin' face million times. even I'm a half Pashtun on my mom's side but unlike u I got decency to respect the person who raised without carin' for her ethnic. most ppl in here got nothin' to do with Tajeks which is why they critisize Tajeks but where did ur fcuking ghairat go before stooping to their level by calling ur mom's khandaan homos, terrorist, cowards 'n what???? I SPIT on a Tajek like u 'cuz u only proved who the real beghairat is 'n I SPIT on ur prideless upbringin' which u want to impose on an Afghans!!!! lawde sag

^ this is what most of you sound like ...




He shouldn't be banned just because you disagree with him.


If he is stirring some animus in most of you then it says a lot more about you than about him. Let him stay so you can learn something about your self.


ps - can someone quote Albani insulting anyone...calling anyone a homo terrorist coward? I searched but couldn't find it.

[Shayesta]

^ You can follow the full discussion on this link, though I will only quote a few of them:

You are coward people. You cry when NATO bomb the **** out of you why they killed innocent people

100 years ago your defeat and cowardice was not different.

Your culture and identiyt was Bacha Bazi. That was even attested by the British, you moron.

Bachai Bazi is nothing else than pedophilia and we know for sure in which society it occures mainly marrying a 7 years old girl to a 80years old man.

The only people who are coward were always you. There are enough evidances showing who were cowards.

You in fact support Taliban, you are Taliban, you provide the Taliban with their needs but when we step in front of your door you cry you are innocent and have nothing to do with the Taliban.

All those drug-addicted soldiers are recruited mainly in the south where poppy grows and grows. That´s the reason why they talk of the ''south''.

Oh yeah, they sleep and live in dirt for 30 years .... have to earn their monies with works that are inhuman and even your own proud Pakhtuns make fun of them.

Non-Pashtuns were fighting them, too, even harsher, but they were also much smarter than any Paki or Arab who came from the Sulaiman Mountains under the excuse of Jihad.

Whne the discussion was about Bacha Bazi one of the brothers claimed that this is a Tajik culture or belong to north. I just proved him wrong and showed him that it was in Afghanistan always a tribal custom and originally from tribal regions and southern Afghanistan.

In Kandahar people don´t get killed (for BachaBazi) because it is part of the society there and still the poople do not call themself as homosexual or pdophile

Stop liying. Ancient Afghaans in the sense of Pashtuns were not even productive and did not knew what science, art, culture, civilisation, education ... were. They were full-blood nomads.

These are just a few of the lies he spread around and whenever, whenever, I asked him for proves he disappeared. Unlike him I did provide him with sources for what I claimed and yet he couldn't digest the fact I did. The problem here is not him pointing out Pukhtoon flaws and nor is my problem that I think Pukhtoons are inferior creatures, the problem here is that he is ridiculing every single, literally every single, Pukhtoon leader and even our history and culture. And just like how you said a person should take a look at himself first and then judge others, exactly same is what this creature needs to do before pointing his fingers at Pukhtoons. This is not a Khorasani forum where a Pukhtoon comes and ridiculous every single Tajik leader (though we hardly had any), calls Tajik culture immune to civilisation, call Tajiks slaves since past few centuries and what not. This is a Pukhtoon forum where a Khorasani comes and disagrees with literally everything a Pukhtoon says, and ridiculous literally everything associated with Pukhto and Pukhtoons. If you want to defend him then fine, but at least follow the discussion formed previously because you have even accused some of speaking from ethnic point of view, while that's exactly what Kabulzada has been doing ever since.

[Albani_Rahmat_Kabulzada]

Oh yes, Shayesta sister, just take them off from their contents and ignore the facts that these were responds to the claims some brothers throw in.

[Shayesta]

^ That's not what Alchemist asked for, he just for any remarks from you which you said. And now you go and quote which Pukhtoon said that Tajiks are immune to civilisation, or that only culture Tajiks are known for is BachaBazi, or called all Tajiks homosexuals, and etcetera. Only then I will believe that those were truly only responses to equally racists remarks only, instead of your actual point of view.

[Alchemist]

^ That's not what Alchemist asked for, he just for any remarks from you which you said. And now you go and quote which Pukhtoon said that Tajiks are immune to civilisation, or that only culture Tajiks are known for is BachaBazi, or called all Tajiks homosexuals, and etcetera. Only then I will believe that those were truly only responses to equally racists remarks only, instead of your actual point of view.

I checked the quotations...and he is right...he only responded as he was attacked. He used the words of those who attacked him and never intiated any disrespect:

In the first quote you mined he was responding to Comrad Pashtun who said:

How dumb can this guy get. Slaves cowards and are those who leave the battlefield and run to Koolab and then only land back with help foreigners. A slave cannot brave the heat of B52s and a 21st century super power the world's ever largest military organisation NATO along with their bacha berish slaves such as Kadozadah.

Second quote you mined ...he responds again to Comrad Pashtun who says:

You are a dishonourable and a true coward. Unfortunately, unless they nuke us Taliban will fight them. We as people are much stronger, just like the Viet Congs were. Obviously, the tactics you refer to are Taliban weapon of choice since they don't drone, F16s and the rest. It is unfare competition/war, but we have the stamina and resolve. When I see we, our warriors the Taliban and the your NATO/U.S. fathers.

We bare foot armed with sword beat that massive British regiment. It was nice. We have other entities, be then the non-entity Kadazadahs fair and square too.

Are you stupid or what? You are the only slave on the block. Pakis can't do anything! I am in the business of "just waiting", when I say I do it. I am not coward like to have run away in every fight. You just waint for NATO/U.S. to leave and this time you will be dealt with decisively once and for all. ANA without Pashtun help will be routed in a week max in the south and east. Then NA will be foot petch battles untill it submits itself to the men of god and honour. Men of god wont backdown untill victory is not achieved. You can't establish nothing, you a coward and a slave. A slave desrves servitude, nothing less or more.

Third quote you mined...again he is using argument of Comrad pashtun:

ay what you want, but the war against your U.S. fathers is one of attrition. And is working and very effective, don't you know that despite the appachies they abandoned eastern provinces i.e. Kunar, Nooristan etc? While we defeated the British 100 years ago, the Russians have further cross-breeded Toojikostanis in Tojikiston. That is why you are non-entity. lol

Not thousands, but for million time you will loose. Why? Because you are a spineless coward who will instead run away untill may be next time Chinese could come and rescue you. You corrupt filthy boy-player bach berish. You rather live happy and in bacha bazi than fight men of god, who you will never be able to stand and face. Non-Pashtun have no problem with Pashtuns, and vice versa, those who does like you will be dealt with swiftly

.


So here you are turning a blind eye to Comrad Pashtun, but feel morally compelled to cry out foul play against Albani? Why? Racist much? Biased? Is that fair? Some one calls you a coward or a bacha berish (euphemism for gay man's boy toy) and you are suppose to accept it because it is said by comrad pashtun?


I am just going by what I have read so far... if this is all you have against Albani to get banned then you have serious issues.

[Shayesta]

^ I don't even want him to get banned, nor have I reported him. That's why I linked the topic so you could go it through yourself, it wasn't hidden. There where Comrade was insulting him and NATO he neither backed down insulting the entire Pukhtoon nation. There where Comrade called NATO supporters BachaBaz he started saying BachaBazi was started in Pukhtoon culture. And not to forget him mentioning being half-Pukhtoon and yet saying Pukhtoons only got civilised due to foreign influence and speak of Pukhtoon homosexuality, I have got no idea in which part to look for 'respect' he 'showed'? Had he provided sources where I had asked him for it, had he reacted to the sources I provided him, we both would have had a much healthier debate.

As for him and Comrade's debates, my debate with him was what was going on between us, not him and Comrade.