Amir al Ghaznavi, discussing politics on Canadian tv....Part 2

[Amir al Ghaznavi]

http://www.ctstv.com/michaelcoren/?vidID=21999


Enjoy brothers and sisters, and as always, i anticipate your feedback

[kakargirl]

Nice video wror i'v downloaded will watch all of it , iv only watched abit now,good comments kakar.

[ghundal]

I was waiting and waiting, and then finally he got to you.

You and that Iranian professor talked about foreign intervention, and I think that that point should have been honed in because it has primarily been the root of the problems in the Muslim world.

These other guys were discussing geopolitics as if it is some sort of game. The Hindu guy needs a smack on his head. I wish you would have said that US, Pakistan, Iran, and India need to stop intervention in Afghanistan. He acted as if India was some innocent child. This intervention is the source of instability in Afghanistan, and the region. This is the point that must be emphasized over and over again. Between the lines what an end to foreign intervention means is "get lost, and deal with others on equal terms."

Good job!

[کیش]

Your hair is mad greasy, how much gel you put on?

Other then that, your debating and body language has Improved from last time.

Do you have a website? I think you should get one, your going on these programs and not advertising something.

[Alchemist]

Some brown nosing-a-gwanin...

Yes America does have a monopoly on the dictator states - The US was siding with Mubarak to the very end - now they are in libya and they are arming rebel thugs like they did in Pakistan - And all the chaos in Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan and Iraq is because of Mossad.

to hell with Coren - Mr. Zionist and what he believes.

But before the ladies comment - Sneakers? nice touch brah.


They "Found" Osama in Pakistan because the next phase on "The War on Terror" is the Balkanization of Pakistan. Pin the blame on the pakistani government and starve em to submission...

Nobel Peace Prize nominee Dr. David Ray Griffin's 2009 book, "Osama bin Laden: Dead or Alive?" presented compelling evidence that bin Laden died in December 2001 -- prompting a BBC documentary of the same name.
Griffin, founder of the soon to be announced 9/11 Consensus Panel, and named among the New Statesman's "50 People Who Matter Today," today released the following statement:
President Obama, speaking of the operation to kill Osama bin Laden, said: "Justice has been done."
It has been widely assumed that, if bin Laden is now dead, the person most responsible for the 9/11 attacks has been brought to justice. But the US government has never provided evidence that the attacks were carried out by bin Laden and his al-Qaeda organization.
In September 2001, Secretary of State Colin Powell promised to provide this evidence, but the next day recanted, saying "most of [the evidence] is classified."
In October, Prime Minister Tony Blair provided evidence that bin Laden and al-Qaeda planned and executed the 9/11 attacks. But he added:
"This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Osama Bin Laden in a court of law."
The FBI's acts that made bin Laden a "Most Wanted Terrorist" does not include the 9/11 attacks. The FBI's chief of investigative publicity explained: "The FBI has been no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11."
A December 2001 video shows a heavy-set Osama bin Laden boasting about the attacks. But doubts were raised by experts, including Duke University's Professor Bruce Lawrence, calling the video "bogus."
Could al-Qaeda have carried out the attacks?
The Washington Post reported that the plane hitting the Pentagon was maneuvered "with extraordinary skill," but the New York Times called the alleged pilot, Hani Hanjour, "A Trainee Noted for Incompetence."
The Twin Towers allegedly fell entirely because of airliner impacts, gravity, and jet-fuel fires -- there were no explosives.
But 118 members of the FDNY reported massive explosions going off in the Towers.
Scientists for 9/11 Truth views the rapid, symmetrical, straight-down collapses of the Towers and nearby WTC 7 as consistent only with controlled demolition (as documented in my 2009 book, "The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7").
And 1500 members of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth agree: The 9/11 attacks were not the work of al-Qaeda.

^ you can't say that on the show.

But yeah...the effects of getting off that pro-Nato organization shows.

[Admin Khan]

Good job.

[ComradePashtun]

Great, thanks for sharing. Where is the host from?

[BLS_1919v2.0]

Comrada da yaw English-Canadian dae.

Nice job wrora....it was fair more balanced (at least in the onset) than the previous ones. I think the Majumdar individual used the leftist terms a little too ideologically and the Iranian professor was not that impressive to be frank. Very bare basic, one wonders why or what he wanted to show by coming on.

[ComradePashtun]

Thanks BLS,
English? He doesn't sound English or British to me. May be he is Australian or Newzealander.

[Toramana]

Hi Abdur Rahman, Very nice and balanced...It is better not to talk in abolutist terms and to leave some space for counter interpretation or different interpretation as you mostly did...I like it and enjoyed it....The Iranian professor as BLS pointed was not impressive....

Thanks for sharing....

[Janana]

Thanks as well for posting, I enjoyed hearing the discussion!

[ghundal]

Hi Abdur Rahman, Very nice and balanced...It is better not to talk in abolutist terms and to leave some space for counter interpretation or different interpretation as you mostly did...I like it and enjoyed it....The Iranian professor as BLS pointed was not impressive....

Thanks for sharing....

I understand why you don't find the Iranian professor impressive because he points out that foreign intervention is the reason for Bin Ladenism (term he coined). This is true. This along with Amir's points were probably the best points of the show. The other people spoke text book language which proved nothing except the continuation of the status quo.


You on the other hand will say, no, foreign intervention in the Muslim world has nothing to do with Bin Ladenism. You will say it is Islam and pan-Arabism.

[Nokia_Apridy]

Amira..............Dar kha ror........khu da Sar Wekho ka da TAILU Baran shwey wu ka sanga ...

[Nick]

http://www.ctstv.com/michaelcoren/?vidID=21999


Enjoy brothers and sisters, and as always, i anticipate your feedback

Good job I am galde you didn't sided with Pakistan in case with Kashmir since Michael clearly mension many times there are more Muslims in India so I guess in other words why side with Muslim Pakistan on the issue of Kashmir.

If I were you I would place I would never mension Kashmir since the Kashmiris always want Kashmir, Indian-Pakistani issue is not new but very old. Pakistan lost the battle of claiming "Majority Muslim Kashmir" which is why they invited China as well as Chinese border to address in regards to their conflict with India. In other words Pakistan sold themselves to China, if we remember from 1959 when USA funded the first investment in Gadawar. China wanted to have an agreement in this new international trade base which was to be given to Port of Singapore Authority.
Thus China at that time pro-communist, was a danger to USA, and so that resulted in Pakistan saying "no" to China.

Therefore China in 1962 came to side Afghanistan for their interest over Pashtunistan claim, in 1965 China even offered Army and soldier deployment to invade Pakistan if Afghanistan needs any help, as well as offer from Russia. Afghanista declined the offer and Daud Khan said he can handle Pakistan since Pashtun tribemans will be fighting along Afghans and shortage in men is not an issue. Now that Chiana was given a "Go" by the Pakistan after realizing that China heavly invested in pro-American-Afghan Government, therefore Pakistan depended on America Aid since British stopped their Annual foreign Aid in 1958.

Today China did more than 50% of the investment (over $500 million, although nothing compared to USA's annually Aid of $1.7 billion, maybe under table would be $3 billion or $5 billion which is hidden from tax payers) as well as building Roads and other regional development. China is so close that Gwadar port is all set to be taken away from the Port of Singapore Authority (PSA) and is likely to be given to the Chinese Authority. A greater role to China was promised by Musharaf in 2008, now the new government is already doing more to win chinese hearts.


Interesting discussion but keep in mind Al ghaznavi that as Afghans we always supported Pakistan on the Kashmir issue, now we must change. Forget Pakistan, I used to say if there is war between Pakistan and India I would join Pakistan, now despite I hate Bollywood as I hate Dall, I came to conclusion to join non of them as they are both indic, and more Indic muslims in India than in Pakistan. I will set back and prefer India to win, cause Pakistan now not just from national level but also from international muslim level Pakistan is a slap in the face of muslim world.

[graveyardofempires]

you are still weak and not close to representing our view.
next time go in with a turban