Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Toramana and the Secularized Imperialist Collaborators and avoiding posts/threads
Collapse
X
-
I did'nt know meaning of bickering, have checked it now in dictionary.Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View PostActually Luffy; Toramana makes claims I want him to hold him accountable for things he claims by supporting it with solid evidence.
this in the real world isn't "bickering"
whining about who's bengali and who's a kamaya ....in a thread which has nothing to do with that ...is bickering.
Thread was about toramana, i agreed with you by clicking thanks button and then i added my views about toramana. And then bengali dude attacked me...lol
and then i responded.
Comment
-
i was all out of rat poison so i couldn't make the stew... figured i might as well get even some other how..that is the best i could do on a short notice.Originally posted by Roshina View Postlol lol lol, khorai, that was so cute, khorai, lol!
LOVE it, DZJ!

"khorai"...LOL
aab e hayat, this is the 21th century. you are an educated man..why are you talking about "kamyaas"??? instead of still believing in pointless things like that, work on something positive and useful such as getting yourself some class.
I am no bird, and no nest ensnares me.
non commercial would cost less if he was in charge himself which he plans on doing. right now it's n herat but soon it will be in qanadahar.
Comment
-
It seems Toramana is avoiding any talk. He supports drone attacks against the tribal people, and hates Imran Khan for opposing drone attacks.Originally posted by Aab-e-Hayat View PostBickering between me and bengali has provided chance for toramana to escape from you...sorry for that.
Is this a person concerned with Pashtuns, or serving a failed US agenda?
Comment
-
Helo man, I am new to this forum and have very limited writing skills. Though I want to learn things and will ask questions if you dont mind.Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View PostThe reason Afghanistan is the focus is because the Imperial Nexus directly militarily within Afghanistan; and their economy is military based thereby it would be crucial to encourage as much fragmentation of it as possible. Yemen and others can come later. If there was more direct military involvement in Yemen, we'd encourage the same thing there.
The way to do things is follow Sayyid Jamaluddin Al-Afghanis method. He has the right comprehensive plan.
Source:
I could not make a good sense from your above quoted sentences so please put some more light on it.
Do you mean the imperial nexus economy is based on military or that of Afg? and why it it would encourage as much fragmentation of Afg? Will this benifit the imperial nexus? Why not Pakistans or India's fragmentation should not benifit the said imperial nexus?
I know nothing about Sayyid Jamaluddin Afghani? So you think islamic modernism is the solution to countries like Afg and pakistan?
And what you mean by Ikhwanul Muslimoon?
Isn't this still divide mankind into 2 bigger parties one the Muslimoons and the other the non-muslimoon and that still there will be conflicts. And since the focus will concentrate on only two bigger divides of mankind, can lead to bigger wars and huge destruction like WW1&2. Instead the many divides on nationalistic fervors will divide mankind into many fractions and the nature of conflicts can be small due to small parties?
Isn't the name of the game is power???
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dildar View PostHelo man, I am new to this forum and have very limited writing skills. Though I want to learn things and will ask questions if you dont mind.
I could not make a good sense from your above quoted sentences so please put some more light on it.
Do you mean the imperial nexus economy is based on military or that of Afg? and why it it would encourage as much fragmentation of Afg? Will this benifit the imperial nexus? Why not Pakistans or India's fragmentation should not benifit the said imperial nexus?
I know nothing about Sayyid Jamaluddin Afghani? So you think islamic modernism is the solution to countries like Afg and pakistan?
And what you mean by Ikhwanul Muslimoon?
Isn't this still divide mankind into 2 bigger parties one the Muslimoons and the other the non-muslimoon and that still there will be conflicts. And since the focus will concentrate on only two bigger divides of mankind, can lead to bigger wars and huge destruction like WW1&2. Instead the many divides on nationalistic fervors will divide mankind into many fractions and the nature of conflicts can be small due to small parties?
Isn't the name of the game is power???

Valid questions here's my response:
What I mean by fragmentation is to fragment their Hegemonic (Imperial) apparatuses, which can often take the form of military. Weaking hegemony
Islamic Modernism/Sayyid Jamaluddin Afghani- there are no quick and easy solutions, but there are solutions which can help make things quicker and easier. I feel that the general thesis of Sayyid Jamaluddin Afghani is correct. Namely
1.) Islamic Unity (Shi'a/Sunni and whatever other group, of all ethnicities and nationalities).create strong interdependence instead of competition to free Muslims from imperial control and societal deterioration due to imperialist culture becoming predominant.
2.) Reexamining Islamic Texts and understanding them to apply to problems relevant to current conditions and circumstances; not focusing on issues which are not immediately pressing
3.) Developing Technological and Scientific Innovation so we do not have to be reliant on capitalist products and can strengthen ourselves so we're self sufficient.
Ikhwan Al Muslimeen: is a movement, one of several which urge Muslims all over the world to put their foolish squabbles aside and work together for a common cause, Absolute Truth and Justice from the Source of Truth and Justice, God.
You strike an interesting argument, one that I have actually thought about before. Would galvanizing Muslims into becoming collaborative Muslim bloc lead to world destruction?
Well I think the premise is flawed, for two reasons, firstly Some might argue Capitalist societies are already a "bloc" of their own, so why are they entitled to run the show? or some might argue that they're split up into little nationalistic entities as well, so turning into a bloc would engender a massive world war.
But if you examine history During World War I and II there was no real "bloc" until Germany or whatever country started attacking all the others. So you can argue that already existing nation states are not anymore or less conflicting or devastating than a monolithic bloc. But also think of the cold war, they used Vietnam/korea/Afghanistan to fight as proxies but USA and the NATO Bloc never actually directly went to war with the Soviet BLOC.
What an Islamic "Bloc" will do is wane the Capitalist Bloc as a global force; and pressure the Capitalist Bloc into internal isolationism, so it can no longer try to manipulate world affairs in it's favor. This will reduce the chance of wars as militarily the Capitalist Bloc will be significantly reduced. The purpose of the Islamic Bloc is not Islamic Expansionism but Islamic Revivalism. If we have that we can have an exodus of Muslims back to Muslim countries and detoxify them from their addiction to capitalist brainwashings, rebuild and develop adequate infrastructures for healthy environment
Comment


Comment