Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Afghanistan Causes Holbrook’s aorta Tear-up

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Afghanistan Causes Holbrook’s aorta Tear-up

    Afghanistan Causes Holbrook’s aorta Tear-up

    Wednesday, 15 December 2010 15:28 -

    According to media reports, American Special Envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, Richard Holbrook, fell ill in the 7th storey of the American Department of State during a meeting about the mission and situation of Afghanistan. His heart suddenly stopped normal blood pumping and was taken to a hospital. Later sources said that there was great pressure on his heart, causing a tearing of aorta. Holbrook was a veteran high-ranking American official of the State Department and a key diplomat. He was the only diplomat who held two slots at the same time as senior advisor for two important regions of the world: Asia and Europe from 1977-1996.
    A French news agency reports, Holbrook gained reputation as an American diplomat when, in 1995, the Dayton Accords were signed thanks to his good offices, ending the Bosnian war. However, all these talents, reputation and experiences notwithstanding, Holbrook failed to play any spectacular role in the solution of the current crisis in Afghanistan and Pakistan -- a crisis which is handiwork of America-- in the past two years in a way that could benefit America and add to his reputation.

    Evidently, his plan and policy was jeopardizing for the regional people and countries and shameful and perilous for America. Holbrook’s goal was to persuade people of Afghanistan and Pakistan to take the American war to the point that people would believe it was a legitimate war of America; array people against each other in ethnic hostilities and keep people occupied and engaged in deceptive peace slogans. However, time and again, this policy has stumbled on frustration and is despicable as a demeanor.

    The believing people of Afghanistan and Pakistan, undoubtedly, understand that Americans are aspiring to keep a long-term occupation of the region and want to tip people of these two countries against each other. Therefore, not only the people have put up resistance to the nefarious mission of Hoolbrook and forge ahead with their resistance but simultaneously, voice their aspiration that, may the Americans kneel down here on this soil and face historical rout.
    It was because of this unanimous spirit of the Muslim people of Afghanistan and Pakistan to crush America, that it had become a cause of frustration and depression for Holbrook. All his schemes and plots had gone awry, bringing under question his reputation that he had won at Balkans.

    At last, Holbrook succumbed to the psychological pressure, leading to a tearing of aorta, a principal artery. His heart stopped to function normally and he fainted at a meeting held at the State Department of America about the mission in Afghanistan and the region. Presumably, he followed in footsteps of a veteran American general, general Petraeus, , who a few months ago, passed out during a senate hearing , slumping over the table.

    In view of the untoward cases of General Petraeus’ fainting and Holbrook’s heart attack, we advise all American rulers, generals and diplomats who are engaged in the Afghan issue to abandon continuation of hostile and colonialist policy about Afghanistan and better to resign from your positions. Afghanistan is not a land and a country where you could attain implementation of your deceptive and devilish schemes; nor it is practicable that the indigenous people of the region would ever ignore the current occupation and existence of 150,000 troops on their soil. They are not going to be swayed either by the policy and bragging of General Petraeuous, Holbrook or other American war-mongering officials.

    The American high-ups should ponder what is the benefit of a task which ultimately will lead to shame, depressions, heart attacks and, still more, to consequences being worst than that

  • #2
    If Taliban claimed that the floods of Pakistan are a punishment from god, and its supporters called hurricane Katrina god vengeance, why should we wonder that now they are gloating about Richard Holbrooke death and attribute the responsibility not to his heart but to their great deeds?
    Are they feeling so unconfident these days, they had to claim a natural death as their own doing?
    Taliban is claiming too that what Holbrooke wanted was to escalate the war and justify it in both Afghanistan and Pakistan. How can this assumption be acceptable? A special envoy to a major war zone with 50 years experience in brokering peace, actually works at escalating the fight?
    One of Holbrooke's major accomplishments was playing a key role in negotiating the Dayton Peace Accords that ended the war in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Those accords, which were signed on December 14, 1995 by Serbian, Bosnian and Croat leaders, ended an ethnic conflict that claimed 100,000 lives.
    http://www.voanews.com/english/news/...111844549.html

    Do not Taliban remember that this peace accord put an end to a genocide perpetrated mostly against Muslims? Do they not remember that the 2 major figures responsible for this genocide were arrested and tried in an international tribunal? Or perhaps they are willfully ignoring it, as today, Bosnia and Herzegovina are supporting the ISAF coalition in ridding Afghanistan of Taliban violence and intimidation?

    "Tonight, there are millions of people around the world whose lives have been saved and enriched by his work," Obama said in a statement.

    http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/12/11/ric...olbrooke.obit/

    Are not Taliban contradictions absurd? One time they claim that we are defeated, and that most of the NATO countries want out thanks to Taliban, and then when Those same countries talk about ending this war, they call it legitimizing it. German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said the world should be grateful to Holbrooke for his contribution to the international strategy in Afghanistan.

    "We regret with all our heart that he will not be able to witness the success of the new strategy," Westerwelle said in Brussels.

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...2265cff81ac788

    Richard Holbrooke was again not working to legitimize the war, he was negotiating a solution and a cooperation in Pakistan and Afghanistan, because the United States believes that terrorism is a major problem festering in both countries.
    "The negotiations were simultaneously cerebral and physical, abstract and personal, something like a combination of chess and mountain climbing," he wrote.

    "A peace deal requires agreements, and you don't make agreements with your friends, you make agreements with your enemies," he told Fareed Zakaria in October.

    http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/12/11/ric...olbrooke.obit/

    As about why these negotiations are harder than any other, it was definitely not for the reason Taliban boast about, but simply because: "There's no Ho Chi Minh. There's no Slobodan Milosevic. There's no Palestinian Authority. There is a widely dispersed group of -- of people that we roughly call the enemy. There's al Qaeda, with which there's no possibility of any discussion at all." He told Fareed Zakariah.

    Noorzai Jahani
    D.E.T USCENTCOM
    Tampa-Florida
    www.centcom.mil

    Comment

    Working...
    X